<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Countable nouns tag:Singular nouns' matching tags 'Countable nouns' and 'Singular nouns'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aCountable+nouns+tag%3aSingular+nouns&amp;tag=Countable+nouns,Singular+nouns&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Countable nouns tag:Singular nouns' matching tags 'Countable nouns' and 'Singular nouns'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3125.9045)</generator><item><title>the word "lack" countable or uncountable</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WordLackCountableUncountable/gcbml/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 01:35:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:511456</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi there,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am from an asian country (korea) and Korean doesn&amp;#39;t distinguish countable or uncountable nouns so I have some problem with this concept even though I have been living in english speaking country for 10 years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now the word &amp;quot;lack&amp;quot; according to the online Longman dictionary is an uncountable noun, as well as a singular noun. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But we usually say &amp;quot;a lack of quality&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;a lack of resources&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now we know for sure we never put &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; in front of &amp;quot;water&amp;quot; because &amp;quot;water&amp;quot; is an uncountable noun, as in &amp;quot;furniture&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;stuff&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So how is it that word &amp;quot;lack&amp;quot; can have an indefinite article in front of it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does it mean that the English language&amp;nbsp;lacks logic inherently?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: in quotation marks</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/InQuotationMarks/zqmkq/post.htm#499867</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:09:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:499867</guid><dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;Should I treat what is in a pair of quotation marks just like an adjective without any difference in terms of whether to place an article or not? &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;Yes.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;I feel like you have to have an article, &amp;#39;a&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;the&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;an&amp;#39;, before a quoted content acting as an adjective for a singular noun. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;With a singular countable noun, yes, you need some kind of determiner.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;... reveals an aspect of &amp;#39;pali-pali&amp;#39; Korean culture. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;This is fine.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;--&amp;nbsp;The&amp;nbsp;&amp;#39;culture&amp;#39; is an uncountable, I think.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;Yes.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best wishes, Clive&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: evening (without preposition) / to start to doing</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EveningWithoutPrepositionStart-Doing/3/zgcvc/Post.htm#447731</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:52:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:447731</guid><dc:creator>Cool Breeze</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;CalifJim wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;since &lt;i&gt;laughter&lt;/i&gt; is an uncountable noun, &lt;u&gt;unlike &lt;i&gt;evening&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/u&gt;.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Unlike &lt;i&gt;evening&lt;/i&gt;?&amp;nbsp; &lt;b&gt;Wow!&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; In that sentence I understand &lt;i&gt;evening&lt;/i&gt; as uncountable!&amp;nbsp; (evening-ness?)&amp;nbsp; Aren't all singular nouns in English uncountable when used without articles?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br&gt;I didn't make my point clearly enough. &lt;img src="/emoticons/emotion-6.gif" alt="Sad [:(]" /&gt; I said &lt;i&gt;evening&lt;/i&gt; is countable, I didn't say it is countable in Steinbeck's sentence. &lt;i&gt;Evening&lt;/i&gt; is listed as countable in dictionaries, unlike &lt;i&gt;laughter.&lt;/i&gt; Therefore it is possible to say: &lt;i&gt;I spent &lt;b&gt;two&lt;/b&gt; evening&lt;b&gt;s&lt;/b&gt; with her,&lt;/i&gt; but we can't normally say: &lt;i&gt;I heard &lt;b&gt;two&lt;/b&gt; laughter&lt;b&gt;s &lt;/b&gt;from the street.&lt;/i&gt; Steinbeck uses &lt;i&gt;evening&lt;/i&gt; as uncountable in his sentence. I find that a little odd and it makes me ask: why? I am just trying to figure out an answer for myself, I'm &lt;u&gt;not&lt;/u&gt; trying to convince all members of these forums that I have the ultimate truth on the matter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mentioned &lt;i&gt;representative&lt;/i&gt; in a previous post. If Portugal sends only &lt;b&gt;one&lt;/b&gt; representative to a beauty contest, we normally say:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;The&lt;/b&gt; representative of Portugal won the beauty contest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/i&gt;If I treat &lt;i&gt;representative&lt;/i&gt; as uncountable, I get:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Representative of Portugal won the beauty contest.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find that sentence a little odd, if not downright incorrect. Similarly, since a hot day has only &lt;b&gt;one&lt;/b&gt; evening&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; it is possible to say "&lt;b&gt;one&lt;/b&gt; evening" because "evening" is countable -&amp;nbsp; I would prefer to say:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;The&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;i&gt; evening of a hot day...&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't object to Steinbeck's choice, I'm just trying to squeeze it into the right grammatical pigeon hole in my brain. Anyway, Jim, I think you said earlier that you also considered the sentence perhaps a little odd or something, I don't remember your exact words right now. We are actually in complete agreement!&lt;img src="/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" alt="Smile [:)]" /&gt; And even if we weren't, what would it matter? My signature is: Live and let live. In this case it should be understood: Use your English and let others use theirs. I'm all for linguistic freedom.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;CB&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: evening (without preposition) / to start to doing</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EveningWithoutPrepositionStart-Doing/2/zgblg/Post.htm#447565</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:45:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:447565</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><description>&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;since &lt;i&gt;laughter&lt;/i&gt; is an uncountable noun, &lt;u&gt;unlike &lt;i&gt;evening&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/u&gt;.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Unlike &lt;i&gt;evening&lt;/i&gt;?&amp;nbsp; &lt;b&gt;Wow!&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; In that sentence I understand &lt;i&gt;evening&lt;/i&gt; as uncountable!&amp;nbsp; (evening-ness?)&amp;nbsp; Aren't all singular nouns in English uncountable when used without articles?&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
CJ&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Which sentence is correct?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhichSentenceIsCorrect/zrnvc/post.htm#421432</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 05:18:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:421432</guid><dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;Hi,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;Which sentence is correct?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;1. I ate prawn last night. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;No&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;2. I ate prawns last night.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt; OK&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;3. I had prawns for dinner last night.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;OK&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;"prawn" is a countable noun but I heard when we refer to "the meat" we should treat the noun as a singular noun.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;For some types of meat, but it sounds odd to me to say 'prawn' in these sentences. Such things are rather idiomatic.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best wishes, Clive&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Which sentence is correct?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhichSentenceIsCorrect/zrndn/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 05:06:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:421426</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Hi.. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Which sentence is correct?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. I ate prawn last night. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. I ate prawns last night. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. I had prawn(s) for dinner last night.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"prawn" is a countable noun but I heard when we refer to "the meat" we should treat the noun as a singular noun. Is it right?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks before&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Correct term for singular possessive as stand-in for a group</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CorrectTermSingularPossessiveStand-Group/dxvqk/post.htm#320783</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 23:21:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:320783</guid><dc:creator>Maripinky</dc:creator><description>I think the grammatical term could be generic noun phrases. When a noun is mentioned as a symbol, example, or representative of &lt;b&gt;all&lt;/b&gt; members of a group  
(almost the same as &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; + plural or noncount nouns or &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; + a singular noun) we refer to it as
having "generic" reference. &lt;br&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/u&gt;A few generic countable nouns look like definite nouns (they follow &lt;i&gt;the&lt;/i&gt;), even though
they do not refer to specific, unique things!  (they are NOT definite)&amp;nbsp;  
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;  &lt;i&gt;The&lt;/i&gt; and a singular count noun can refer to a whole group 
(not just one specific member). This occurs often in formal writing,
and with inventions, musical instruments, parts of the body.
&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;i&gt;
&lt;u&gt;The lion&lt;/u&gt; is endangered&lt;br&gt;
&lt;u&gt;The heart&lt;/u&gt; is like a pump&lt;br&gt;
When was &lt;u&gt;the radio&lt;/u&gt; invented?&lt;br&gt;
She plays &lt;u&gt;the piano&lt;/u&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;u&gt;The inexperienced student&lt;/u&gt; may need help.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;(which lion?  not just one lion, but all lions)&lt;br&gt;
(which heart?  all hearts)&lt;br&gt;
(which radio?  not the radio in my apartment, but the idea)&lt;br&gt;
(which piano? She has this general ability.)&lt;br&gt;
(which student?  Any inexperienced student.)
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;


&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt; &lt;i&gt;The&lt;/i&gt; and a plural count noun can occasionally refer to all members of a human group in
general .. not just particular people konwn to the speaker/writer and listener/reader.  This is the least common kind of generic
nouns, usually referring to a religiously, politically, or professionally-based group of people.  
&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;i&gt;
The Germans are known for their beer.&lt;br&gt;
The Republicans will meet in Philadelphia&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;  (which Germans?  all of them)&lt;br&gt;
(which Republicans?  representatives of all of them)
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;i&gt;The&lt;/i&gt; can also be followed by an adjective (with no noun) to refer to a whole class (usually of
people):
&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;i&gt;
The blind leading the blind&lt;br&gt;
The rich and the poor&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;(which blind what?  all blind people)&lt;br&gt;
(which rich/poor what?  all rich/poor people)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>any in summary</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AnyInSummary/dlzcx/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:52:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:306099</guid><dc:creator>New2grammar</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;I have gone through a lot of the old posts on the topic &lt;EM&gt;any&lt;/EM&gt;.&amp;nbsp; This is my understanding of &lt;EM&gt;any&lt;/EM&gt; usage.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Any&lt;/EM&gt; can be followed by a plural/uncountable/singular noun.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. When any is used in interogative or negative form, it is usually followed by a plural/uncountable noun. Does it mean that the verb always agrees with the plural/uncountable noun if the noun is also a subject?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you have any &lt;STRONG&gt;kids&lt;/STRONG&gt; that &lt;STRONG&gt;are&lt;/STRONG&gt; older than 9 years old?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There &lt;STRONG&gt;aren't&lt;/STRONG&gt; any good &lt;STRONG&gt;options&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Exceptional case.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;He is amazed that there &lt;STRONG&gt;isn't&lt;/STRONG&gt; any sales &lt;STRONG&gt;tax&lt;/STRONG&gt; in MN.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There &lt;STRONG&gt;isn't&lt;/STRONG&gt; any widely used password &lt;STRONG&gt;checker&lt;/STRONG&gt; out there which &lt;STRONG&gt;has&lt;/STRONG&gt; the ...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. When it is used in declarative form, it is usually followed by a singular noun.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any &lt;STRONG&gt;idea&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;is&lt;/STRONG&gt; a good idea =&amp;gt; the verb agrees with the singular noun &lt;EM&gt;idea&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Exceptional case.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have any &lt;STRONG&gt;comments&lt;/STRONG&gt;, please e-mail &lt;STRONG&gt;them&lt;/STRONG&gt; to me. =&amp;gt; the pronoun agrees with the plural noun &lt;EM&gt;comment&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>The classification of words and the article attached (+abstract plural)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ClassificationWordsArticleAttached-AbstractPlural/ddzkk/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:08:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:266927</guid><dc:creator>Aperisic</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Courier New" color=#008000 size=2&gt;People have found this text useful so I am repeating it here in this entirety with error fixed (there are several posts combined in it)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" color=#000080 size=4&gt;B&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;efore I give you more detailed explanation I have to tell you that in dictionaries you can frequently find the type of the word: countable, uncountable, mass, abstractâ¦ However what is more important is to understand that the context is equally important. You can turn many words into abstract if you want to express an idea, quality or experience, and you can as well make from an uncountable word a countable one if you want to speak about one particular appearanceâ¦ So before you decide what is the type of the word you have to know&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;what is the most frequent context in which&amp;nbsp;the word is found 
&lt;LI&gt;what are the contexts you can use the word 
&lt;LI&gt;whether and how each context changes the meaning of&amp;nbsp;the word 
&lt;LI&gt;which context is maybe awkward for&amp;nbsp;the particular word&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Once you know the context you can decide about the article attached. So here you have all contexts that one word can be found in. Do not forget that it is possible that you &lt;EM&gt;can&lt;/EM&gt; change the context even when your dictionary says that a word is, for example, strictly countable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A &lt;EM&gt;ball&lt;/EM&gt; can mean one instance of ball, a more or less round gadget of different materials for playing games, but &lt;EM&gt;ball&lt;/EM&gt; can mean the experience of playing games with a ball.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;A ball is usually round. - one ball 
&lt;LI&gt;Ball, however I've loved it, is what hurts my knees. - &lt;EM&gt;the experience of playing different games with a ball&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, this is the advanced level of understanding and for some time you should be very strict and use&amp;nbsp;words how they are given in the dictionary. But, in order to truly understand some exceptions in literature you have to have the following view better.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;1. The possible contexts of a&amp;nbsp;word&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;count nouns&lt;/B&gt; one ball-two balls-some balls&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;they have plural 
&lt;LI&gt;in&amp;nbsp;singular you have to use &lt;EM&gt;a/an &lt;/EM&gt;or &lt;EM&gt;the&lt;/EM&gt; 
&lt;LI&gt;in plural you use&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;the&lt;/EM&gt; to define a particular instance, and without &lt;EM&gt;the&lt;/EM&gt; to define a type&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;uncount nouns&lt;/B&gt; homework-fun-knowledge-privacy-furniture&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;they have singular but it is used, by the rule, without &lt;EM&gt;a/an&lt;/EM&gt; 
&lt;LI&gt;they do not have plural 
&lt;LI&gt;you do not count them using one, two... but you can measure them using &lt;EM&gt;some, a piece ofâ¦&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;mass nouns&lt;/B&gt; coffee-beer-cheese&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;in&amp;nbsp;singular they can mean&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;substance&lt;/EM&gt; and in that case they are uncount so you do not use &lt;EM&gt;a &lt;/EM&gt;but if you use &lt;EM&gt;the&lt;/EM&gt; you mean a particular kind of that substance 
&lt;LI&gt;in&amp;nbsp;singular you can use &lt;EM&gt;a&lt;/EM&gt; but in that case you talk about a regular portion or a type, &lt;EM&gt;a&lt;/EM&gt; is actually a substitute for &lt;EM&gt;one&lt;/EM&gt; (I want a coffee = I want one coffee = I want one cup of coffee) 
&lt;LI&gt;in plural they mean several regular portions or types (several different cheeses = several different type of cheeses, two coffees = two cups of coffee)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;singular nouns &lt;/B&gt;sun-strain-past-future&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;they are always singular and they always need a determiner (the sun, a strain, the past) 
&lt;LI&gt;some normal nouns may have a special meaning when they are used as a singular noun (a note of urgency = a tone of haste)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;plural nouns&lt;/B&gt; glasses-spectacles-clothes-conditions&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;they have only plural and you do not usually count them, but there are exceptions (&lt;EM&gt;two goods&lt;/EM&gt; is not common, &lt;EM&gt;two scissors&lt;/EM&gt; is ok) 
&lt;LI&gt;you can use only &lt;EM&gt;the&lt;/EM&gt; for known occurrences, for other the rules are similar to an uncount noun, unless you can count them (&lt;EM&gt;a/one scissors&lt;/EM&gt; but even then you better say &lt;EM&gt;some scissors, a pair of scissors&lt;/EM&gt;) 
&lt;LI&gt;some normal words may have a different meaning when used as a plural noun (&lt;EM&gt;conditions&lt;/EM&gt; - the factors that affect something)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;collective nouns&lt;/B&gt; army-crew-government&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;they behave as a count noun but they can use singular or plural verb form, which depends on how you observe a group - as one item or a collection of several items&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;proper nouns&lt;/B&gt; names&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;they have &lt;EM&gt;the&lt;/EM&gt; or do not have &lt;EM&gt;the&lt;/EM&gt; based on the special rules or simply a custom&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;compound nouns&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;they are the nouns made of several words 
&lt;LI&gt;apart from that they can belong to any other group mentioned here 
&lt;LI&gt;they have special rules of creating the plural&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;abstract nouns&lt;/B&gt; intelligence-joy-relief&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;abstract nouns are usually uncountable and they behave as one 
&lt;LI&gt;if you count them or use plural, you are referring to&amp;nbsp;particular instance(s) &lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;We choose our joys and sorrows long before we experience them.&lt;/EM&gt; (&lt;EM&gt;joys&lt;/EM&gt; - the things that make us joyful)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;concrete nouns&lt;/B&gt; the nouns that are referring to physical objects&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;they can be in any group said above except abstract&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As you can see the rules are strict, but there are exceptions. We say that uncountable nouns you cannot count, they&amp;nbsp;do not use &lt;EM&gt;a&lt;/EM&gt; and have no plural. However, if the word belongs to an abstract group expressing idea, feeling or experience, it may still be counted and have the&amp;nbsp;plural when you mean about the particular occurrence(s). Not all abstract words are capable to switch to plural.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Some words can be observed as uncountable (hair) and behave as one, but if you use &lt;EM&gt;a&lt;/EM&gt; they change the meaning. &lt;EM&gt;hair - strands growing on head or body, a hair - single strand growing on head or body (or found in a soup&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;EM&gt; &lt;EM&gt;)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; However, you can see that &lt;EM&gt;a&lt;/EM&gt; is used to restrict the occurrence to certain physics dimension. Not all uncountable words are capable to use &lt;EM&gt;a&lt;/EM&gt; and to be &lt;EM&gt;counted&lt;/EM&gt;. If they do they almost without an exception change the meaning, though sometimes the change is not very serious.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;water&lt;/EM&gt; is uncountable so the rules says no plural, but then you deprive yourself from some important possible usages or understanding&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;waters -&lt;/B&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;a type of mineral waters 
&lt;LI&gt;all rivers that flow into a large river or cover certain region 
&lt;LI&gt;drops 
&lt;LI&gt;place(s) to practice water sports 
&lt;LI&gt;the places covered with water on the Earth 
&lt;LI&gt;an area, realm&amp;nbsp;(it can leads us to unknown waters) 
&lt;LI&gt;the water natural beauties like waterfall, cascades... 
&lt;LI&gt;a spa 
&lt;LI&gt;the water near the shore of region or country 
&lt;LI&gt;a type of water coming from many different sources - toxic waters&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;a water -&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;a river or lake or any closed area covered with water 
&lt;LI&gt;a small amount of water that was examined for purity 
&lt;LI&gt;a drop&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So uncountable &lt;EM&gt;water&lt;/EM&gt; is very capable to switch to a countable case with, of course, &lt;EM&gt;change&lt;/EM&gt; of the meaning. Thus, the entire previous detailed classification is frequently relative. (However, when you use words in their regular and natural and most common context you use the strict rules: &lt;EM&gt;furniture in my house&lt;/EM&gt;, not &lt;EM&gt;furnitures in my house&lt;/EM&gt;, unless you have all together Louis XV, Louis XVI and Louis XVII furniture in your house [furnitures - types of furniture] to show off around. &lt;EM&gt;The furnitures we have are: commercial use furniture, counter system furniture, job station furniture, retail counter furniture&lt;/EM&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope you start getting a picture. However, before you go into this area more thoroughly, it is highly recommendable to follow the standard usage especially if you have kind of exam.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The most frequent case is that each word has many different meanings. Each meaning can belong to a completely different group of words. A good dictionary gives the classification not by the word, but by each meaning of the word. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sometimes you have to guess the classification, which is normally not so difficult.&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: the cases of abstract nouns taking &amp;quot;thes&amp;quot;</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CasesAbstractNounsTakingThes/ddrvg/post.htm#265376</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:58:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:265376</guid><dc:creator>Aperisic</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Before I give you more detailed explanation I have to tell you that in dictionaries you can frequently find the type of the word: countable, uncountable, mass, abstractâ¦ However what is more important is to understand that the context is equally important. You can turn many words into abstract if you want to express an idea, quality or experience, and you can as well make from a uncountable word a countable one if you want to speak about one particular appearanceâ¦ So before you decide what is the type of the word you have to know&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;what is the most frequent context in which&amp;nbsp;the word is found 
&lt;LI&gt;what are the contexts you can use the word 
&lt;LI&gt;whether and how each context changes the meaning of&amp;nbsp;the word 
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;P&gt;which context is maybe awkward for&amp;nbsp;the particular word&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Once you know the context you can decide about the article attached. So here you have all contexts that one word can be found in. Do not forget that it is possible that you &lt;EM&gt;can&lt;/EM&gt; change the context even when your dictionary says that a word is, for example, strictly countable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A &lt;EM&gt;ball&lt;/EM&gt; can mean one instance of ball, a more or less round gadget of different materials for playing games, but &lt;EM&gt;ball&lt;/EM&gt; can mean the experience of playing games with a ball.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;A ball is usually round. - &lt;EM&gt;one ball&lt;/EM&gt; 
&lt;LI&gt;Ball, however I've loved it, is what hurts my knees. - &lt;EM&gt;the experience of playing different games with a ball&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, this is the advanced level of understanding and for some time you should be very strict and use&amp;nbsp;words how they are given in the dictionary. But, in order to truly understand some exceptions in literature you have to have the following view better.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;FONT size=4&gt;The possible contexts of a&amp;nbsp;word&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;count nouns&lt;/B&gt; one ball-two balls-some balls&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;they have plural 
&lt;LI&gt;in singular you have to use &lt;EM&gt;a/an &lt;/EM&gt;or &lt;EM&gt;the&lt;/EM&gt; 
&lt;LI&gt;in plural you use&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;the&lt;/EM&gt; to define a particular instance, and without &lt;EM&gt;the&lt;/EM&gt; to define a type&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;uncount nouns&lt;/B&gt; homework-fun-knowledge-privacy-furniture&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;they have singular but it is used, by the rule, without &lt;EM&gt;a/an&lt;/EM&gt; 
&lt;LI&gt;they do not have plural 
&lt;LI&gt;you do not count them using one, two... but you can measure them using &lt;EM&gt;some, a piece ofâ¦&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;mass nouns&lt;/B&gt; coffee-beer-cheese&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;in singular they can mean a substance and in that case they are uncount so you do not use &lt;EM&gt;a &lt;/EM&gt;but if you use &lt;EM&gt;the&lt;/EM&gt; you mean a particular kind of that substance 
&lt;LI&gt;in singular you can use &lt;EM&gt;a&lt;/EM&gt; but in that case you talk about a regular portion or a type, &lt;EM&gt;a&lt;/EM&gt; is actually a substitute for &lt;EM&gt;one&lt;/EM&gt; (I want a coffee = I want one coffee = I want one cup of coffee) 
&lt;LI&gt;in plural they mean several regular portions or types (several different cheeses = several different type of cheeses, two coffees = two cups of coffee)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;singular nouns &lt;/B&gt;sun-strain-past-future&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;they are always singular and they always need a determiner (the sun, a strain, the past) 
&lt;LI&gt;some normal nouns may have a special meaning when they are used as a singular noun (a note of urgency = a tone of haste)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;plural nouns&lt;/B&gt; glasses-spectacles-clothes-conditions&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;they have only plural and you do not usually count them, but there are exceptions (&lt;EM&gt;two goods&lt;/EM&gt; is not common, &lt;EM&gt;two scissors&lt;/EM&gt; is ok) 
&lt;LI&gt;you can use only &lt;EM&gt;the&lt;/EM&gt; for known occurrences, for other the rules are similar to an uncount noun, unless you can count them (&lt;EM&gt;a/one scissors&lt;/EM&gt; but even then you better say &lt;EM&gt;some scissors, a pair of scissors&lt;/EM&gt;) 
&lt;LI&gt;some normal words may have a different meaning when used as a plural noun (&lt;EM&gt;conditions&lt;/EM&gt; - the factors that affect something)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;collective nouns&lt;/B&gt; army-crew-government&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;they behave as a count noun but they can use singular or plural verb form, which depends on how you observe a group - as one item or a collection of several items&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;proper nouns&lt;/B&gt; names&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;they have &lt;EM&gt;the&lt;/EM&gt; or do not have &lt;EM&gt;the&lt;/EM&gt; based on the special rules or simply a custom&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;compound nouns&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;they are the nouns made of several words 
&lt;LI&gt;apart from that they can belong to any other group mentioned here 
&lt;LI&gt;they have special rules of creating the plural&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;abstract nouns&lt;/B&gt; intelligence-joy-relief&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;abstract nouns are usually uncountable and they behave as one 
&lt;LI&gt;if you count them or use plural, you are referring to a particular instance(s) &lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;We choose our joys and sorrows long before we experience them.&lt;/EM&gt; (&lt;EM&gt;joys&lt;/EM&gt; - the things that make us joyful)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;concrete nouns&lt;/B&gt; the nouns that are referring to physical objects&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;they can be in any group said above except abstract&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As you can see the rules are strict, but there are exceptions. We say that uncountable nouns you cannot count, they&amp;nbsp;do not use &lt;EM&gt;a&lt;/EM&gt; and have no plural. However, if the word belongs to an abstract group expressing idea, feeling or experience, it may still be counted and have the&amp;nbsp;plural when you mean about the particular occurrence(s). Not all abstract words are capable to switch to plural.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Some words can be observed as uncountable (hair) and behave as one, but if you use &lt;EM&gt;a&lt;/EM&gt; they change the meaning. &lt;EM&gt;hair - strands growing on head or body, a hair - single strand growing on head or body (or found in a soup&lt;img src="/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" alt="Smile [:)]" /&gt;)&lt;/EM&gt; However, you can see that &lt;EM&gt;a&lt;/EM&gt; is used to restrict the occurrence to certain physics dimension. Not all uncountable words are capable to use &lt;EM&gt;a&lt;/EM&gt; and to be &lt;EM&gt;counted&lt;/EM&gt;. If they do they almost without an exception change the meaning, though sometimes the change is not very serious.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;water&lt;/EM&gt; is uncountable so the rules says no plural, but then you deprive yourself from some important possible usages or understanding&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;waters -&lt;/B&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;type(s) of mineral waters 
&lt;LI&gt;all rivers that flow into a large river or cover certain region 
&lt;LI&gt;drops 
&lt;LI&gt;place(s) to practice water sports 
&lt;LI&gt;the places covered with water on the Earth 
&lt;LI&gt;an area, realm&amp;nbsp;(it can lead us to unknown waters) 
&lt;LI&gt;the water natural beauties like waterfall, cascades... 
&lt;LI&gt;a spa 
&lt;LI&gt;the water near the shore of region or country 
&lt;LI&gt;a type of water coming from many different sources - toxic waters&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;a water -&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;a river or lake or any closed area covered with water 
&lt;LI&gt;a small amount of water that was examined for purity 
&lt;LI&gt;a drop&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So uncountable &lt;EM&gt;water&lt;/EM&gt; is very capable to switch to a countable case with, of course, &lt;EM&gt;change&lt;/EM&gt; of the meaning. Thus, the entire previous detailed classification is frequently relative. (However, when you use words in their regular and natural and most common context you use the strict rules: &lt;EM&gt;furniture in my house&lt;/EM&gt;, not &lt;EM&gt;furnitures in my house&lt;/EM&gt;, unless you have all together Louis XV, Louis XVI and Louis XVII furniture in your house [furnitures - types of furniture] to show off around. &lt;EM&gt;The furnitures we have are: commercial use furniture, counter system furniture, job station furniture, retail counter furniture&lt;/EM&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope you start getting&amp;nbsp;the picture. However, before you go into this area more thoroughly, it is highly recommendable to follow the standard usage especially if you have kind of exam.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now, back to your question.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The abstract nouns are usually regarded as uncountable, thus if you use &lt;EM&gt;the&lt;/EM&gt; you mean of one particular occurrence.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;That medicine is very good. The relief was immediate. (the relief: in my case, when I used it ...)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>