<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Dates tag:Lazy English' matching tags 'Dates' and 'Lazy English'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aDates+tag%3aLazy+English&amp;tag=Dates,Lazy+English&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Dates tag:Lazy English' matching tags 'Dates' and 'Lazy English'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3191.21962)</generator><item><title>Re: Is American English lazy English?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AmericanEnglishLazyEnglish/2/blzq/Post.htm#8193</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2003 06:07:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:8193</guid><dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator><description>There is nothing wrong with adapting, ammending or streamlining the English language.&lt;br /&gt;It should evolve with us. Certainly the Americans seem to be insistant on this trend. O.K.&lt;br /&gt;Q. So why do Americans stick to the antiquated imperial system of measurement?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As nationalities continually interact around the word, shouldn't there be ONE set standard for both measurement and English? Emagine if you gave a spelling test to students from different English speaking countries. Q. What would be the correct spelling for the word "COLOR/COLOUR" ? (for example)  Who would pass the test and who would fail?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I feel there is a strong need to consolidate and standardise any form of communication that crosses ethnic and international boundaries.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mitch in Japan</description></item></channel></rss>