Hello! Please, could you explain me what is the difference between those two: 1.A history of English language 2.The history of English language For me it seems natural that the definite article should be used in this case, but I have

can anyone explaine why you can't write for.-- Legal cases are 'brought against ' defendents, not 'for' them. I wrote : another ,additional but they were worng right answer was further why ?-- Because 'another' and 'additional' cannot be preceded

Hi, why do the following titles contain the definite article and not the indefinite article: Gunship: The Helicopter Simulation (name of a computer game) Bridge: The English Magazine for Students (name of a magazine) The above are real life examples.

Hi, why do the following titles contain the definite article and not the indefinite article: Gunship: The Helicopter Simulation (name of a computer game) Bridge: The English Magazine for Students (name of a magazine) The above are real life

Hi. 1. Why is there a definite article, "the", before the phrase (a proper name?) "King's Garden"? Here, would you say the word "King's" is more or less functioning as an adjective? In Nehemiah

The short answer to your question is no. The word "imbued" is not used in everyday language, and is probably inappropriate in the given context, even if intended metaphorically. It means "saturated", and your example would mean

Hi Anon: English is inconsistent when using the definite article with names. There are some general (rather complex) guidelines, and there are exceptions. We use "the" before ordinal numbers the first, the second, the third..... so that

Hi, Thanks!! But I am still confused... Please let me organize all the things. In my understanding so far, (A) whether or not " -ese" words (Japanese, Chinese, Tiwanese, Vietnamese, etc.) accompany definite articles depends

It seems that both usages are well represented in the english language, and I'd say that the option with the definite article left out is more common. Am I correct about this? I'd say you probably are. For what it's worth I find the

Hello everyone, I've noticed that when a noun precedes another (proper) noun, as a designation of that following proper noun, like a profession of a person or similar, giving a closer desription or classification of the following proper noun,