<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Determiners tag:Countable nouns' matching tags 'Determiners' and 'Countable nouns'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aDeterminers+tag%3aCountable+nouns&amp;tag=Determiners,Countable+nouns&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Determiners tag:Countable nouns' matching tags 'Determiners' and 'Countable nouns'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3161.22795)</generator><item><title>Re: in quotation marks</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/InQuotationMarks/zqmkq/post.htm#499867</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:09:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:499867</guid><dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;Should I treat what is in a pair of quotation marks just like an adjective without any difference in terms of whether to place an article or not? &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;Yes.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;I feel like you have to have an article, &amp;#39;a&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;the&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;an&amp;#39;, before a quoted content acting as an adjective for a singular noun. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;With a singular countable noun, yes, you need some kind of determiner.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;... reveals an aspect of &amp;#39;pali-pali&amp;#39; Korean culture. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;This is fine.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;--&amp;nbsp;The&amp;nbsp;&amp;#39;culture&amp;#39; is an uncountable, I think.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;Yes.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best wishes, Clive&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Denoting Past possibility : &amp;quot;Could be&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;could have been&amp;quot;</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DenotingPastPossibilityCouldCould/zgzch/post.htm#448569</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:17:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:448569</guid><dc:creator>Sabyakgp</dc:creator><description>Grammar Geek,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are right, voyage is a countable noun so requires a determiner. Also, I am sorry for the typo "dengerous".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best Regards,&lt;br&gt;Sabya&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/b&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: there is not/ there is no</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ThereIsNotThereIsNo/zvclz/post.htm#438027</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:50:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:438027</guid><dc:creator>Lcchang</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;CalifJim wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;&lt;I&gt;difference&lt;/I&gt; is a countable noun.&amp;nbsp; Countable nouns in the singular require a determiner.&amp;nbsp; &lt;I&gt;no&lt;/I&gt; is a determiner.&amp;nbsp; &lt;I&gt;not&lt;/I&gt; is not a determiner.&amp;nbsp; &lt;I&gt;not&lt;/I&gt; negates the verb.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;So you can have the positive statement &lt;I&gt;There is&lt;/I&gt; with the determiner &lt;I&gt;no&lt;/I&gt; and noun the &lt;I&gt;difference&lt;/I&gt;.&lt;BR&gt;Or you can have the negative statement &lt;I&gt;There is not &lt;/I&gt;with the determiner &lt;I&gt;any&lt;/I&gt; and noun &lt;I&gt;difference&lt;/I&gt;.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;But you can't have the negative &lt;I&gt;There is not&lt;/I&gt; and then add &lt;I&gt;difference&lt;/I&gt; without a determiner.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;CJ&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you CJ. I love your answer the best. Thanks to others too.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;LCChang&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: what could come after a preposition?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CouldAfterPreposition/zdpxb/post.htm#436918</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:27:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:436918</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><description>The only thing that can come after a preposition to form a
prepositional phrase is a noun phrase, usually a noun accompanied by
its preceding determiner and perhaps an adjective.&amp;nbsp; A relative
clause may be added.&amp;nbsp; The noun itself may be a gerund.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If the element after the candidate for a preposition looks like it's not a noun, then either of these holds:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
a. The preposition candidate is not a preposition, but perhaps an adverb or conjunction.&lt;br&gt;
b. The structure after the preposition candidate actually is a noun phrase.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Both of your examples are in the category labeled b.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In your first example &lt;i&gt;bad&lt;/i&gt; should be viewed as an adjective &lt;u&gt;used as a noun&lt;/u&gt;, 'promoted' to a noun because of the elision of &lt;i&gt;situation&lt;/i&gt; or its equivalent, &lt;i&gt;one&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;The situation can be seen as a bad situation.&lt;br&gt;
The situation can be seen as a bad one.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In your second example, &lt;i&gt;bad&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;good&lt;/i&gt; are simply abstract uncountable nouns meaning &lt;i&gt;that which is bad&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;that which is good&lt;/i&gt;, respectively.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
CJ&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: there is not/ there is no</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ThereIsNotThereIsNo/zdkcb/post.htm#435269</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:10:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:435269</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><description>&lt;i&gt;difference&lt;/i&gt; is a countable noun.&amp;nbsp; Countable nouns in the singular require a determiner.&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;no&lt;/i&gt; is a determiner.&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; is not a determiner.&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; negates the verb.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So you can have the positive statement &lt;i&gt;There is&lt;/i&gt; with the determiner &lt;i&gt;no&lt;/i&gt; and noun the &lt;i&gt;difference&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
Or you can have the negative statement &lt;i&gt;There is not &lt;/i&gt;with the determiner &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; and noun &lt;i&gt;difference&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But you can't have the negative &lt;i&gt;There is not&lt;/i&gt; and then add &lt;i&gt;difference&lt;/i&gt; without a determiner.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
CJ&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beauty and the beast... why &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; before &amp;quot;beast&amp;quot; only?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BeautyBeastBeast/zcrnp/post.htm#427667</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 02:30:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:427667</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><description>&lt;i&gt;Beauty&lt;/i&gt; is ambiguous.&amp;nbsp; It's both a proper noun, and thus the
name of a person, and an abstract noun referring to the property of
being beautiful.&amp;nbsp; The most usual meaning of &lt;i&gt;the beauty&lt;/i&gt; is &lt;i&gt;the beautiful woman&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;the beast&lt;/i&gt; is that particular beast that the story is about, not just &lt;i&gt;any beast&lt;/i&gt;, i.e., not just &lt;i&gt;a beast&lt;/i&gt;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;Beast&lt;/i&gt; is capitalized because it's part of a title.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So you could have "The Beauty and the Beast", but not "Beauty and Beast", because &lt;i&gt;beast&lt;/i&gt; is a countable noun in the singular.&amp;nbsp; Such nouns must have a determiner.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You could also have "A Beauty and a Beast", but then you can ask "Which
beautiful woman?&amp;nbsp; Which beast?", and you'd have to read the story
to find out, of course.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The difference is not a large one, and the choice of "Beauty and the Beast" is pretty much arbitrary.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
CJ&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: You only shot a single dear.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/YouOnlyShotASingleDear/zrhhh/post.htm#419754</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 21:17:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:419754</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><description>&lt;u&gt;de&lt;b&gt;e&lt;/b&gt;r.&lt;/u&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Singular countable nouns in English must have a determiner.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;single&lt;/i&gt; is an adjective, not a determiner.&lt;br&gt;
It has nothing to do with meaning.&amp;nbsp; That is, just because an
adjective means the same thing or something similar to the determiner
does not mean you can leave out the determiner.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
CJ&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: ï¼´ï½ï½ï½ãï½ï½ãï¼®ï¼¯ãï½ï½ï½ï½ãï½ï½ï½ï½</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Default/vxrmd/post.htm#403073</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 06:17:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:403073</guid><dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;Please look the sentence "This is NO easy task". What part of speech is "NO" in the sentence?&amp;nbsp; My English-Japanese dictionaries say this NO is an Adjective because it modifies and negates the phrase "easy task". But I understand that "task" is a Countable Noun and if I am right, I think we maybe need to put some determiner before "no (Adj) + easy (Adj) + task (countable N)". So I think this "NO" is rather a kind of negative article (or determiner) that is equivalent to the German "KEIN". Am I right?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;I can't compare to the German language. However, I would agree that 'no' is a determiner here.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;We also say things like&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;Tom is no honest man.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;No excuse(s) will be accepted.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;No man is an island.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;No bus stops on Main Street.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best wishes, Clive&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;</description></item><item><title>ï¼´ï½ï½ï½ãï½ï½ãï¼®ï¼¯ãï½ï½ï½ï½ãï½ï½ï½ï½</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Default/vxrln/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 05:38:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:403066</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I'm an English learner from Japan and I have a question.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Please look the sentence "This is NO easy task". What part of speech is "NO" in the sentence?&amp;nbsp; My English-Japanese dictionaries say this NO is an Adjective because it modifies and negates the phrase "easy task". But I understand that "task" is a Countable Noun and if I am right, I think we maybe need to put some determiner before "no (Adj) + easy (Adj) + task (countable N)". So I think this "NO" is rather a kind of negative article (or determiner) that is equivalent to the German "KEIN". Am I right?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thank you in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: software name?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SoftwareName/vjpjw/post.htm#382797</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:50:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:382797</guid><dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;1. How do you decide on how to put English articles in front of (software game??) names like Playstation 3? Do you have to&amp;nbsp;make a&amp;nbsp;decision as to whether it is used as a&amp;nbsp;software or used a game first? Maybe, the rule is if used as a game, put the article in; whereas, if it is used as a sacred name of a particular type of software that is being enjoyed by youngster all over the world? Can you make some sort of&amp;nbsp; connection to the rules that apply to some proper names?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;as fun as the Playstation 3&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;I think that Playstation 3 is actually a piece of equipment that you buy with some software already installed. Isn't that true? So, it's a thing.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I am speaking generally of the product, I would say 'Sony had great success last year with Playstation 3'. But if I am speaking individually, I'd say 'Today I bought &lt;STRONG&gt;a &lt;/STRONG&gt;Playstation 3 for my son'. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please note also that software is not a countable noun. You say things like 'I bought some software'. If you want to talk about some particular kind of software, you would typically say something like 'I bought a piece of software' or 'I bought a software package'.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;2. When you have a possessive placed in front of a noun, does that 'possessiveness' overrides all determiners including determiners for superatives?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;She is Korea's most beautiful woman.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;Normally, you would write like this if the underlined possessive is not used:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;She is the most beatitul woman in Korea.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;So, an argument can be made that&amp;nbsp;these sorts of possessives can override all determiners. Can it? &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;I think so, although I don't like to make very general statements. I don't see it as just related to superlatives. eg&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Seoul is&lt;STRONG&gt; the&lt;/STRONG&gt; capital of South Korea.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Seoul is South Korea's capital.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best wishes, Clive&lt;/P&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>