what is the difference between : that would later be known by the name of Aramco. / that later to be known as Aramco . The difference is that the second version of your sentence is incorrect. The word 'that' introduces a relative

In my opinion, websites oversimplify their explanations of conditional sentences, unwisely suggesting each and every conditional sentence can be classified into one of four types, namely, the first, second, third and zero conditional. Since there

Thanks, Mister Micawber. However, I've got a different opinion about Rule #1 from another native speaker. Let me post the original questions and answers: " - by caxtontype: I don't see how Rules #1 and #2 apply.

The antecedent of the relative pronoun is the plural writers . That's why the plural verb contribute must be used. By the way, choosing the wrong verb form in sentences like yours is very common in all languages which make a difference between

I am not sure why you would use Wikipedia as your source for grammar information when dedicated manuals are readily available. The advantage the manual has over Wikipedia is that the information has been organized for maximum usefulness. I must

I am not sure why you would use Wikipedia as your source for grammar information when dedicated manuals are readily available. The advantage the manual has over Wikipedia is that the information has been organized for maximum usefulness. I must

Thanks, GG. I understand that the past perfect should be used in the subordinate clause to make the sentence mean that I wouldn't leave until I had accomplished the act. But what is the difference between using the past perfect in the

The first sentence is more grammatically correct and clearer to understand. Yet, I would substitute "whom" with "who", as "who" is the subject of the clause "who have signed the agreement". Access to

You don't have to thank me for my input. I just have a habit of sticking my nose in places where it should not be. We definitely have different mindsets when it comes to composing sentences. Tired and hungry, I walked to the bathroom and

The "if" subjunctive variety was not the main issue here. At this juncture, we are not particularly concerned about the "if" conditionals, or degree of possibility and certainty. Perhaps that's another topic. The heavy