I know where to go. (same sentence - no case conflict) I'm as comfortable saying that "where" is what I know and "to go" answers the question; as I am to say that "to go" is what I know and "where"

Hi, vineeta. Welcome to English forums. Thanks for joining us. Actually, "What" is the subject of these sentences. In this case it's a pronoun, third person singular. "You" is the direct object of the verb. It's like,

1.Somehow this sort of traditional Hamlet aspect in the untraditional character he was playing didn't seem to fit together. 2.The people who want to play with the cards that have goods trains on have to sit here. 1) It is a very obtuse

Sentences 2 and 3 are correct. Sentence 1 should be: Please give James and me your undivided attention. James and me are the direct object which occur after the verb; therefore, the pronoun should be him, her or me in this case.

Hello, I've got some questions about passivazation and the use of indirect object. Firstly, I met a sentence, Good care was taken of the children by Mary , which was indicated as acceptable in grammaticality. Its corresponding

Hi Elizabeth Re: 'He asked her to dance'. That was a great reply to something that I too was unsure about. If I understand you correctly, that example is analysed as: 'He - asked - ' i.e. S-V- , where O is an

what is the use of the underlined pronoun in the sentence:Most of them give her support...

Please tell me why this sentence is correct: Alcohol and tobacco are harmful to whoever consumes them. I thought that if the pronoun is a direct object then the objective case is used. However, it is appropriate to use the nominative case when the

Hello why is this wrong? can you explain? I suggested him the Holiday Inn. It's wrong,. here is an example,so I can use "suggest" with "him,her,it" indirect pronouns cannot I ? http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/suggest

"If the i.o.u.'s are issued as threated, it would be the first time since 1992 -- when Gov. Pete Wilson paid roughly 100,000 state employees with them -- that the warrants were used to hold over those to whom the state owed money . "