<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Direct questions tag:Adverbs' matching tags 'Direct questions' and 'Adverbs'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aDirect+questions+tag%3aAdverbs&amp;tag=Direct+questions,Adverbs&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Direct questions tag:Adverbs' matching tags 'Direct questions' and 'Adverbs'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3191.21962)</generator><item><title>Re: when to?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhenTo/ggwkz/post.htm#533091</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:28:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:533091</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Taka&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;I think what the author is trying to say is&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&amp;#39;&lt;u&gt;&lt;b&gt;when you&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/u&gt; change trains&amp;#39;,&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; Yes, that&amp;#39;s most likely the intent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Taka&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;but is that &amp;#39;when to&amp;#39; grammatically acceptable?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; Not here.&amp;nbsp; No.&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;when to&lt;/i&gt; clauses are indirect questions, hence, they function as noun phrases:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;I didn&amp;#39;t know when to change trains.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Be sure to tell him when to change trains.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They don&amp;#39;t function as adverbs:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;*You have to walk when to change trains.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;*Be sure to read the posted signs when to change trains.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CJ&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Re: Relative Clauses and Indirect Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/RelativeClausesIndirectQuestions/vjcdw/post.htm#378938</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:48:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:378938</guid><dc:creator>Cool Breeze</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Clive wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;I don't see any of these as relative clauses. They are&amp;nbsp;noun clauses. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;eg noun clause&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt; I read&lt;/font&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#7fffd4"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;what he wrote.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;e&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;g relative clause&lt;/font&gt; &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;I read the letter&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt; &lt;em&gt;which he wrote&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt; Here, &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;which he wrote&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt; is relative (ie relates to)&amp;nbsp;the noun &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;'letter'.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;I&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt; don't see any indirect questions, either.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hi Clive&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is an interesting thread. All maner of terms are used to describe clauses&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; and I am not saying your terms are wrong. However, &lt;i&gt;what&lt;/i&gt; is very commonly considered a relative pronoun which includes the antecedent. The following quotation is from Otto Jespersen's &lt;i&gt;Essentials of English Grammar&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"33.6&amp;nbsp; Though the relative and interrogative pronouns and adverbs beginning with &lt;i&gt;wh&lt;/i&gt; are identical in form, it is possible in most cases to tell whether a clause is relative or interrogative. &lt;i&gt;What&lt;/i&gt; is relative in 'I insist on paying what it has cost,' but interrogative in 'I insist on knowing what it has cost.'"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jespersen doesn't use the term "noun clause" at all. Of course that doesn't mean "noun clause" is an incorrect term, it just proves there are many ways to describe language. In fact, I don't think I have ever read a grammar book that uses the term "noun clause."&lt;img src="/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" alt="Smile [:)]" /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To me, all of the original poster's what-clauses are relative clauses. No. 5 isn't a sentence, though, as it has no main clause; in other words, the part preceding &lt;i&gt;what&lt;/i&gt; has no subject and finite verb.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers&lt;br&gt;CB&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: inverted word order</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/InvertedWordOrder/bqnjl/post.htm#166050</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 16:05:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:166050</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;. direct question&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;negative adverbs that begin a sentence&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;comparison&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;adv place at the beginning of a sentence&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;omission if&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;expressions with'only' that begin a sentence&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;so, neithe, nor&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Indirect questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IndirectQuestions/cvlx/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:10:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:11183</guid><dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator><description>A student asked me the folowing question. Why doesn't the object precede the verb in the indirect question "Do you know what's wrong with it?" as it usually does in indirect questions like "Do you know what it is?". I think it might have something to do with "wrong" being used as an adverb and the use of the prep phrase "with it". But I can't put my finger on it. Hope you can. thanks</description></item></channel></rss>