<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:English vocabulary tag:Tenses' matching tags 'English vocabulary' and 'Tenses'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aEnglish+vocabulary+tag%3aTenses&amp;tag=English+vocabulary,Tenses&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:English vocabulary tag:Tenses' matching tags 'English vocabulary' and 'Tenses'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3191.21962)</generator><item><title>Re: Present Perfect vs Present Perfect Progressive</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PresentPerfectPresentPerfect-Progressive/cjvwz/post.htm#212556</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 03:06:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:212556</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><description>1)&amp;nbsp; I see no significant difference between your two sentences
whether with live, work, or study.&amp;nbsp; I would not assume anything
with regard to English vocabulary and grammar!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2) To start with, I would say &lt;i&gt;... during the past ten years&lt;/i&gt;.&amp;nbsp; The second version (with the progressive tense) mixes two incompatible ideas.&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt; has been flying&lt;/i&gt; indicates an activity (no specific time limits).&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;over 300,000 miles&lt;/i&gt; indicates an accomplishment (with time limits).&amp;nbsp; The phrase &lt;i&gt;during ten years&lt;/i&gt; doesn't come into it.&amp;nbsp; The sentence seems wrong even without it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
3)&amp;nbsp; I'm not sure what the question is.&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;... have been watching ...&lt;/i&gt; is progressive (but not present progressive as you claim) because it has an &lt;i&gt;-ing&lt;/i&gt; form.&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;... watched ...&lt;/i&gt; is not progressive (although it is past as you claim) because it does not have an &lt;i&gt;-ing&lt;/i&gt; form.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
CJ&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>