http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aFootball+tag%3aRegards+tag%3aCommasSearch results for 'tag:Football tag:Regards tag:Commas' matching tags 'Football', 'Regards', and 'Commas'en-USCSMOD (Build: 3273.32735)http://www.englishforums.com/English/GrammarDoubts2ToMrp/2/brkbc/Post.htm#86430Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:33:51 GMT946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:86430mrpedanticHello Sextus As it s quite a long paragraph I ve put some suggestions in square brackets The sq brackets replace the text in curly brackets The paragraph breaks are merely for ease of reading and aren t supposed to be suggestions Let me know if these edits change your meaning 9 To see To get an idea of the Pyrrhonean attitude at work we can think of it may be helpful to imagine a Pyrrhonist s facing how a P would deal with a given disagreement dash rather than comma say the disagreement about whether or not question of whether abortion is morally wrong He would examine the arguments for and against the immorality of abortion abortion in terms of morality trying to determine if whether one of the contending views grasps had grasped its real nature One of the parties to the dispute will argue for instance that the fetus has a soul which makes him her a human being and that the murder of a human being is something morally wrong This party may also put forward an argument based upon religious beliefs since God has created the fetus and hence is the only one who only God can make decisions about his her death The contrary party will probably argue that it is absurd to claim that a three month old fetus is a person as much as any of us that the notion of a creating god does not make sense for them and that we must privilege the woman s right to decide what to do with her body and life The Pyrrhonist will weigh up these opposing arguments and will first note that the different opinions about abortion that people held these two parties hold appear to be relative to factors similar to those mentioned in the so called Tenth Mode of Aenesidemus He will point out that such opinions seem to be dependent upon each party s familial cultural and social background as well as upon its religious metaphysical and scientific beliefs and theories so that one will be able to may say how abortion appears to be in relation to each of these factors but not how it is in itself But the Pyrrhonist s inquiry will not stop here there he will attempt to determine whether any of the parties in conflict can justify its claims For doing so To do so the Pyrrhonist will turn to three of the so called Five Modes of Agrippa according to which in trying to justify any claim one falls into either infinite regress or circular reasoning or makes an unjustified assertion That is to say in attempting to prove the truth of an assertion a person will have to prove the truth of the premises premise from which he infers the assertion and so on ad infinitum Or to To avoid being thrown back ad infinitum he will try to establish the truth of one of the links of the chain of proofs by having recourse to the first link whose truth he set out to establish thus falling into circularity Or he will argue that one of the links of the chain needs no proof to establish its truth because for instance it is self evident To this the Pyrrhonist will respond that the contrary party can proceed in exactly same way thus being way that there moreover there is no reason for trusting to trust one of them rather than the other As a result the Pyrrhonist will be unable to decide the disagreement over resolve the question of the morality or immorality of abortion and will therefore suspend judgment over the matter Of course he would proceed in the same way as regards with regard to the disagreement over the existence or inexistence of anything good or bad by nature There are two important points that we must bear in mind First the Pyrrhonist is not committed to the criteria of justification formulated in the three modes in question but only uses them because such criteria are accepted by the dogmatists themselves as ruling their own reasoning the basis of their own reasoning Second the Pyrrhonist does not rule out the possibility of ever finding a claim that meets the dogmatists standards since for all he knows there might may be an assertion or set of assertions that could survive the assault of the Agrippan modes I m not sure whether the vocabulary I use here to talk about the dispute over abortion sounds like English or as Spanglish No it sounds like English Pity I would have liked to see some Spanglish 12 in the very first place in the first place See you MrP PS almost forgot Pier Luigi Not an obscure continental scholar but an international football referee better known in England than most of his tribe have any right to be for his unusual appearance and sometimes mystifying decisions