You've already said "to," at the beginning. Don't repeat it at the end. But you need to add "does": To whom does this pen belong? Now, I should let you know that while that sentece is quite correct, it sounds very

Ahmed, if he wishes to insult, let him do it-Almost all Americans are like that. He's talking about a thing that doesn't exist. In America it's all about sex . Nothing more. It's a generalisation that makes you out

Ahmed, if he wishes to insult, let him do it-Almost all Americans are like that. He's talking about a thing that doesn't exist. In America it's all about sex . Nothing more.

Dear friend, while there exists such a word combination ( ie, mentality level ), its use is extremely rare - once in 400 million words, as shown by the Corpus of Contemporary American English, at least. In your example, the word mentality most

In American English, both are considered correct. In fact, "beat" seems to be more popular than "beaten" in common conversational English. I have a feeling that 'beaten' is used more when there is a physical

In American English, both are considered correct. In fact, "beat" seems to be more popular than "beaten" in common conversational English. , ,'res','1','','0CAcQFjAA')"

I've been told by British friends that "different to" is basically the British equivalent of the American "different than": Neither is approved of by hardcore prescriptivists, but everybody uses them anyway. The American

Dear friend, * London is different of Hong Kong - incorrect; London is different from/to Hong Kong - correct; *In Argentina, Christmas celebrations are completely different as the ones in England - incorrect; In Argentina, Christmas celebrations

I think have got is British and got / have alone is American. I use the later because I learned American English.

;d envision on a golf course. If you get to the point where you're saying "1000 yards"