<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Genitives tag:Indefinite articles' matching tags 'Genitives' and 'Indefinite articles'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aGenitives+tag%3aIndefinite+articles&amp;tag=Genitives,Indefinite+articles&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Genitives tag:Indefinite articles' matching tags 'Genitives' and 'Indefinite articles'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3191.21962)</generator><item><title>Re: genitive as a noun</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GenitiveAsANoun/vqnxc/post.htm#416689</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:24:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:416689</guid><dc:creator>Believer</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you, Eimai_Anglos.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are you saying a genitive cannot be made a countable noun or used &amp;nbsp;as a countable noun? I think a guru has delivered&amp;nbsp;expert advice on that aspect of grammar and&amp;nbsp;I think it has been said a construction like "a shaking&amp;nbsp;of a ground" means "an &lt;U&gt;instance &lt;/U&gt;of shaking of a ground." Please note that it is a shaking&amp;nbsp;in what seems to be a countable noun form.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you give me your expertise in this matter?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Why can some genitives&amp;nbsp;have the indefinite article "a" like the genitive noun word "shaking"?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. At the same time, why don't I&amp;nbsp;never seem to have encountered a plural form of the&amp;nbsp;word "shaking" as "shakings"?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. Here, "with shouting, yelling and swearing, the motorists ...," would you say the phrase "with shouting, yelling and swearing" is&amp;nbsp;correctly written? If it is correctly written, then what&amp;nbsp;kind of noun are they? My dictionary seems to note that "shouting" is a countable noun but for the two others, I am not&amp;nbsp;sure.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: how would you write it?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HowWouldYouWriteIt/dnbdr/post.htm#314772</link><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:43:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:314772</guid><dc:creator>Feebs11</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Believer wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have a sentence I think I&amp;nbsp;saw written somewhere.&amp;nbsp;How would you rewrite it so it is correct? I think it is incorrect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Our&amp;nbsp;company has a children's center for our employees &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;[who are]&lt;/font&gt; in need of child care.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;I can't see a problem with this sentence otherwise. The indefinite article is fine in this context&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think when you have a name in the genitive, normally the article refers to the noun that immediately follows it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;I have a student who has graduated from a CET's course.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here, let us assume CET&amp;nbsp;stands for &lt;u&gt;(the??)&lt;/u&gt; Certified Electrical Technician and for the above sentence, &lt;em&gt;a &lt;/em&gt;modifies the abbreviation 'CET', &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;doesn't&lt;/font&gt; it?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;No - it relates to "course"; CET is merely used adjectively to identify the course. The course is unspecified apart from being &lt;b&gt;a CET course&lt;/b&gt;, therefore "a" is correct. If the course was specifiied as a particular course in a particular institution, then "the" would be required.&amp;nbsp; "....the CET course at *** College."&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you have any suggestions&amp;nbsp;that will help me to decide correctly whether there a need to put the underlined article there?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>genitive  VS  compound noun</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GenitiveVsCompoundNoun/dmpcj/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:31:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:313897</guid><dc:creator>Hela</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Dear teachers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;First, happy New Year to you all, and thank you for your kindness and dedication. I want to tell you that you've helped a lot throughout these years and I feel deeply endebted to you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My question for today is: Can I use the indefinite article with the genitive? Is it correct to say: "It's &lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt; five kilometres&lt;B&gt;'&lt;/B&gt; walk" ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What's the difference between : "It's &lt;B&gt;a&lt;/B&gt; five kilometres&lt;B&gt;&lt;FONT color=magenta&gt;'&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;/B&gt;walk" (genitive); and &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"It's &lt;B&gt;a&lt;/B&gt; five&lt;B&gt;&lt;FONT color=magenta&gt;-&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/B&gt;kilometre walk"&amp;nbsp;(compound noun) ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What should I say:&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;a) "There is two weeks delay" ; (with or without an apostrophe after "weeks" ?)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;b) "There is &lt;B&gt;a&lt;/B&gt; two weeks delay" ; (with or without an apostrophe after "weeks" ?)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;c) "There is a two-week delay" ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Many thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hela&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: quiz questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/QuizQuestions/dcxqm/post.htm#264719</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 19:55:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:264719</guid><dc:creator>Cool Breeze</dc:creator><description>&lt;font face="Arial"&gt;Hi Believer&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In all your examples, &lt;i&gt;of&lt;/i&gt; is not a part of the co-called of-genitive and thus does not require &lt;i&gt;the&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Knowledge&lt;/i&gt; is an exceptional uncountable noun, it can take the indefinite article although it is never used in the plural:&lt;br&gt;He has a working knowledge of English.&lt;br&gt;I have a poor knowledge of history.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Q3, Q5 and Q7 there is an adjectival attribute before a noun and in English such adjectives tend to bring on &lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;an&lt;/i&gt; before nouns that don't necessarily require an article in other contexts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers&lt;br&gt;CB&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: One dictionary says...</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/OneDictionarySays/2/mlgn/Post.htm#62250</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2004 02:39:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:62250</guid><dc:creator>paco2004</dc:creator><description>Hi MrP and Casi&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here's another article supposedly relating to our discussion, which I just skimmed it. Sounds the construction "[adj] or [a noun] of [a noun]" is an expression used to show speaker's emotion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://mapage.noos.fr/matushansky/Downloads/GLOW25.pdf" target="_blank" title="http://mapage.noos.fr/matushansky/Downloads/GLOW25.pdf"&gt;Ora Matsushansky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By the way OED mentions about the construct [so/how/that/too a noun] in a part of the entry of the indefinite article &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;a&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; like this:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;A&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; follows the adjectives as in &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;many a&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;such a&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;what a!&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; and the obsolete or dialectal &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;each a&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;which a&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;; it follows any adjectives preceded by &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;how&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;so&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;as&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;too&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, as &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;how large a sum&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;; and in earlier English the genitive phrases &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;what manner&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;no manner&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;whatkins&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;nakins&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;what sort&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, etc., as &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;what manner a man&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; (= &lt;EM&gt;cu jus modi homo?&lt;/EM&gt;) In none of these was the &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;a&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; found in Old English. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Many a&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; is not to be confused with the approximative &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;a many&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;. &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Such a&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; was earlier &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;a such&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;. &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Each a&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;which a&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; survive in the north, as &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;ilk a&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;whilk a&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;. &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;What manner a&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, and its likes soon became corrupted to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;what manner of&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I think this is little informative but what interestes me a little is that those special constructs were created (or imported?) at the time of Middle English. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;paco&lt;br /&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>