<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Genitives tag:Verbs' matching tags 'Genitives' and 'Verbs'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aGenitives+tag%3aVerbs&amp;tag=Genitives,Verbs&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Genitives tag:Verbs' matching tags 'Genitives' and 'Verbs'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3191.21962)</generator><item><title>Re: gerund or verbal noun with an article?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GerundVerbalNounArticle/2/gmbrk/Post.htm#560381</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:35:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:560381</guid><dc:creator>Cool Breeze</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Crokey&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;how do you feel about possessives before a gerund? &amp;quot;John&amp;#39;s singing bothered me&amp;quot;. You are constantly told that the possessive should be used before a gerund(unless you are saying something weird and you wish to emphasise the subject of the gerund). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have given my opinion in an earlier post. Page 1 of this thread offers you a link to it (subject of gerund). As the gerund fluctuates between being a noun and a verb and resembles both to some extent, it stands to reason that a genitive is often possible before it and so is an adjectival attribute&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; at least in your example.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t really care what the ing-form is called in each case. I&amp;#39;m not obsessed with terminology. If anyone thinks the gerund is a &lt;u&gt;complete&lt;/u&gt; noun, he should explain why the gerund can have a &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;u&gt;passive&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/font&gt; form: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;He enjoys &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;being seen&lt;/font&gt; in my company.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would like to see the passive forms of other nouns, like &lt;i&gt;a girl&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;courage&lt;/i&gt;, for example.&lt;img src="http://www.englishforums.com/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" alt="Smile" title="Smile" /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CB &lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: gerund or verbal noun with an article?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GerundVerbalNounArticle/2/glqpw/Post.htm#560056</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:54:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:560056</guid><dc:creator>Crokey</dc:creator><description>hi cb,&lt;br /&gt;im so happy i joined this forum now, because i think your comment about verbal nouns can be modified by an adjectival attribute. You said it your previous reply, but i must have missed it(it was nearly 4am in korea when i read it!), and i think the tiresome banging of the nail&amp;#39;s head is well and truly finished! On further research, the naming of other nouns derived from verbs, such as survival from survive or action from act, is a fairly contentious area, and i am going to take a leaf from your book, and stay the bloody-hell away from it!!! Just one other question CB, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;the singing of the bird awoke me&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the singing of the bird&amp;#39;s awoke me&amp;quot; ? as &amp;quot;a friend of my uncle&amp;#39;s&amp;quot;, where you use the post-genitive form. I would say &amp;quot;the bird&amp;#39;s singing&amp;quot;, there is probably a clear case, but after my ordeal with gerunds and verbal nouns i&amp;#39;m afraid to go searching now. Before the gerunds and verbal nouns i had a encounter with absolute phrases and some very confusing definitions of what differs it from participles, thankfully that is behind me now also. In that example of &amp;quot;the bird&amp;#39;s singing awoke me&amp;quot;(just to make sure the nail doesn&amp;#39;t spontaneously pop back up) is &amp;quot;singing&amp;quot;a gerund, because it is possible to say &amp;quot;the bird&amp;#39;s loud singing awoke me&amp;quot;, with singing modified by an adjective. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;cheers again cb, really grateful.</description></item><item><title>Re: Grammar rules - check for correctness - a kind teacher please :)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GrammarRulesCheckCorrectness-Teacher/gzkpc/post.htm#528838</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:30:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:528838</guid><dc:creator>Angle1</dc:creator><description>Here are some examples &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The main point is to explain the correct answer&lt;br /&gt;The sentences are little-bit childisch ;they are some modified sentences.&amp;nbsp; I am afraid that my explanations seems to be a little childisch, too. So please help me how to turn it into the right explanation. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;Mary was real angry because Jack didnÂ´t show up&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Real &amp;gt;&amp;gt; really -&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;we use an adverb to determine the adjective&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;Fewer &lt;/span&gt;of the passangers is sick today&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Fewer &amp;gt;&amp;gt; One&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;- the verb is refers to singular, so we need to use singular pronoun&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I&amp;nbsp;asked my brother &lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;whom&lt;/span&gt; was on the phone&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Whom &amp;gt;&amp;gt; who â Whom i sused in object case and with pronouns â we need a&amp;nbsp;subject for the verb in the second clause&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Jorge doesnÂ´t have &lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;no&lt;/span&gt; bullets in his rifle&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;No &amp;gt;&amp;gt; any&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;- we should avoid double negation in written English. We could use either has + no or negation + any&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I&amp;nbsp;am just a&amp;nbsp;little confused &lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;whether or not to go on exam.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Whether to be or not to be â I&amp;nbsp;know how it should be, but I&amp;nbsp;cannot explain it :/&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;Having be&lt;/span&gt; a&amp;nbsp;dancer myself, I&amp;nbsp;have excellent posture&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Having be &amp;gt;&amp;gt; beeing â but how to explain it ??? &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I&amp;nbsp;never did like &lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;these &lt;/span&gt;kind of exercises&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;These &amp;gt;&amp;gt; that â but could it be also this if I&amp;nbsp;were pointing at it? &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Kind is singular, so we need a&amp;nbsp;singular demostrative pronoun&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;You &lt;/span&gt;telling the truth is ..&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;You &amp;gt;&amp;gt; your â telling is a&amp;nbsp;gerund, gerunds are used like nouns. We need a&amp;nbsp;possessive pronoun&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The bakery depends on meal beeing delivered without delay&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Meal &amp;gt;&amp;gt; mealÂ´s â beeing is a&amp;nbsp;gerund, and meal refers to this gerund. We need to use a&amp;nbsp;genitive form with âÂ´sâ&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: About the meaning of &amp;quot;where&amp;quot;</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AboutTheMeaningOfWhere/2/zlqvh/Post.htm#476347</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:56:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:476347</guid><dc:creator>Velimir</dc:creator><description>Hello again,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Unfortunately,I&amp;#39;ve put one part in my previous post wrongly.Sorry for that.It would be correct to use the preposition &amp;quot;toward&amp;quot; in the following part:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;But,if the verb indicates motion,or in plain english,if you are :going toward, flying toward, traveling toward..&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What I&amp;#39;ve stated after that would be true now,i.e the following noun will be in the dative case.But,if the stress is on the final destination of flying,traveling,going..then the following noun will be in the accusative case,necessarily preceded with the preposition &amp;quot;to&amp;quot;.(the preposition &amp;quot;to&amp;quot; perfectly match serbian &amp;quot;za&amp;quot;,as attendant to the verbs of motion).&lt;br /&gt; Although the case of a noun is influenced by the verb,modifying adjective(and its case),number(and its case)and gender of that noun,the case of the noun is most heavily influenced by the preceding preposition,if it is present.If the noun is not preceded with a preposition then other factors will determine the case of the noun.The importance of the preposition is apparent in the following example:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I arrived in London. - the noun &amp;quot;London&amp;quot; is in the accusative case&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I arrived from London. - the noun &amp;quot;London&amp;quot; is in the genitive case&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I suppose that it would require serious contemplation to explain all aspects of the &amp;quot;case&amp;quot; in any language,and additional comparison with english would make it really painful.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best regards&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: several grammar questions (2)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SeveralGrammarQuestions2/zkklh/post.htm#469819</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:33:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:469819</guid><dc:creator>Hoa Thai</dc:creator><description>Hi Anon,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have never heard of the name list that you described for genitive types. However, here are 7 genitive types discussed by Bergen and 
Cornelia Evans, in &lt;i&gt;A Dictionary of Contemporary American Usage&lt;/i&gt;:
       &lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Classifying or descriptive genitive ("the room's furnishings")&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;Possessive genitive ("Irene's coat")&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Subjective and objective genitive ("God's creation")&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;Genitive of purpose ("He has written many children's books.")&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Measures and other adverbial genitives ("At one time the
genitive form of certain words could be used as an adverb.
Most of our adverbs that end in an 's' (or 'z') sound,
such as "nowadays," "since," "sometimes," "upwards," are 
survivals from this period.)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;Survivals of "an old genitive of source" ("hen's eggs")&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Partitive and appositive genitives (don't exist in English,
        but we express them with an "of" phrase, as in "some of us," 
        "the state of Ohio," "the title of president")&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;Based on these 7 types, I would guess that all four genitive phrases that you questioned belong to type 1.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: He insisted on my/me singing a song.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/InsistedSingingSong/zjwrg/post.htm#464140</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:31:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:464140</guid><dc:creator>Cool Breeze</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Grammar Geek wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Singing is a gerund, a noun, so it takes the possessive &lt;em&gt;my&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is rather peculiar, I think. I have encountered the same thing on these forums many times. Native speakers say: "A gerund is a noun." Do they teach it that way in American schools and universities? Grammatical terminology varies greatly from country to country but I have yet to meet a grammarian who says a &lt;u&gt;noun&lt;/u&gt; can have an &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;object&lt;/font&gt;:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;I insisted on his &lt;u&gt;speaking&lt;/u&gt; &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;English&lt;/font&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/i&gt;Furthermore, &lt;b&gt;all&lt;/b&gt; &lt;font color="#006400"&gt;nouns&lt;/font&gt; can have an adjectival attribute; in other words, we can put an &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;adjective&lt;/font&gt; before them:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;He likes &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;old &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#006400"&gt;books&lt;/font&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;Merry old &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#006400"&gt;England &lt;/font&gt;fascinates me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;Little &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#006400"&gt;Mary&lt;/font&gt; wanted to go out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;Useful &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#006400"&gt;information&lt;/font&gt; was given to everybody.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/i&gt;So, if gerunds are full-fledged nouns, the following is correct:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;Correct&lt;/font&gt; &lt;font color="#006400"&gt;speaking &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;English&lt;/font&gt; is easy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/i&gt;Few consider it correct. A gerund is neither a noun nor a verb; it's a cross between them. It has some qualities characteristic of nouns and some that are characteristic of verbs. It resembles a verb in that it can take an &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;object, &lt;/font&gt;for instance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Therefore, "I insist on him speaking English" and "I insist on his speaking English" are equally grammatical. In the first sentence, &lt;i&gt;him&lt;/i&gt; is used due to the influence of the preposition &lt;i&gt;on&lt;/i&gt;, which is normal English grammar. In the second sentence &lt;i&gt;his&lt;/i&gt; is used because &lt;i&gt;speaking&lt;/i&gt; is a noun to &lt;u&gt;an extent&lt;/u&gt;, even though it's not a complete noun. It has long been customary to consider possessive forms (my, his, our) of personal pronouns better than the object forms (me, him, us) as subjects of a gerund. It also used to be common to consider the basic or common form of other words better in this position:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;I insist on John Smith speaking English. &lt;/i&gt;(Also: John Smith's)&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;I insist on everybody speaking English. &lt;/i&gt;(Rarely: everybody's)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the past 30 or so years I have noticed a tendency in American magazines and newspapers to prefer the genitive even in cases where it sounds and looks ludicrous. I assume this can be ascribed to rising standards in&amp;nbsp; education. Nevertheless, there has never been a &lt;u&gt;grammatical&lt;/u&gt; justification to consider one of the alternatives better. The tendency to consider the possessive form the better seems to me to stem from grammatical ignorance rather than a good knowledge of it. There is no grammatical or historical justification for preferring either form.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers&lt;br&gt;CB&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: saxon genitive once again :)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SaxonGenitiveOnceAgain/zwgzx/post.htm#458742</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:08:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:458742</guid><dc:creator>Hoa Thai</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to WordNet - &lt;i&gt;bird's nest, bird nest, and birdnest&amp;nbsp;&lt;/i&gt; =
nest where birds lay their eggs and hatch their young. The phrases,
however, by themselves, do not say whether the nest is human made or
bird made; additional context is required. Moreover, as you might already know, people also talk about &lt;i&gt;bird's nest soup&lt;/i&gt;, which is made from the &lt;i&gt;saliva of birds / birds' saliva&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding &lt;i&gt;birds nest,&lt;/i&gt; your interpretation is all right if you use &lt;i&gt;nest &lt;/i&gt;as a verb. However, &lt;i&gt;girls school &lt;/i&gt;is a school that only girls attend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best wishes,&lt;br&gt;Hoa Thai</description></item><item><title>Re: saxon genitive once again :)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SaxonGenitiveOnceAgain/zwgrd/post.htm#458646</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:56:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:458646</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Thank you both for your effort.&lt;br&gt;It is highly appreciated and has helped me a lot in my frustrating studies &lt;font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;img src="/emoticons/emotion-15.gif" alt="Geeked [8-|]" /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you don't mind, take a look at this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;bird's nest - the nest of the bird&lt;br&gt;birds' nest - the nest of more than one bird&lt;br&gt;birds nest - nest is a verb means "birds are building up their dwellings" &lt;br&gt;(I found another one "girls school" and here I am not sure whether is it the same principle or even if this construction is possible or not)&lt;br&gt;bird nest -&amp;nbsp; if anybody do know what it means, please, let me know. My guess is that it is just two-word noun saying which "kind of animals" &lt;br&gt;has built it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards!!!&lt;br&gt;[&lt;font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;img src="/emoticons/emotion-5.gif" alt="Wink [;)]" /&gt;]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: sentence to a 3 year's imprisonment</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceYearsImprisonment/zhcng/post.htm#452801</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:48:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:452801</guid><dc:creator>Cool Breeze</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Grammar Geek wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;&lt;p&gt;What is the context for &lt;em&gt;It's 10 minutes' meeting&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;It's a 10 minutes' meeting&lt;/em&gt;? Those don't sound normal at all! So I'm missing something.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;It's a meeting of 10 minutes &lt;/em&gt;sounds grammatical, but not natural. But my mind doesn't rebel against it like the two above.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hi GG&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was concentrating more on the genitive than the verb. However, if a goup of people has a 10-minute meeting every Monday morning, I might use the present tense to inform a new employee about the meeing and its duration: &lt;i&gt;It's a 10 minutes' meeting.&lt;/i&gt; I didn't consider the tense to be the gist of the matter, and anyone can of course change it to whatever sounds better. I just wanted to give &lt;u&gt;my opinion about the structures&lt;/u&gt; I think correct in such expressions:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;It's a two-mile walk.&lt;br&gt;It's a two miles' walk.&lt;br&gt;It's two miles' walk.&lt;br&gt;It's a walk of two miles.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers&lt;br&gt;CB&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>two questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TwoQuestions/zrbgv/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:21:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:418000</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please answer these.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Does this require a singular or plural noun?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think Philip from this forum&amp;nbsp;wrote this:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With the introductory "there," you will find both &lt;U&gt;singular and plural verb&lt;/U&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Sometimes I get very confused as to whether a possessive is acting in a classifying capacity or a possessive capacity.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;It's the president's war. At this point it also appears&amp;nbsp;clear it's also the Senate Republicans' war.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think they both ( the president's war and the Senate Republicans' war) are used&amp;nbsp;in a possessive (genitive??) capacity, but some things are not so clear to me, could you help?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The prosecutor's argument&amp;nbsp;-- What is 'the' modifying, the prosecutor or the argument? Only context would tell?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Japan's product -- Usually I thought when a word like 'Japan' is used, the article 'the' is not used. Is this an acceptable exception? How could you tell? Context would tell?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;An egg is a hen's egg. -- Which part does 'a' here modifying -- the word 'egg' or 'hen'?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>