<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Gerunds tag:Phrasal verbs' matching tags 'Gerunds' and 'Phrasal verbs'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aGerunds+tag%3aPhrasal+verbs&amp;tag=Gerunds,Phrasal+verbs&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Gerunds tag:Phrasal verbs' matching tags 'Gerunds' and 'Phrasal verbs'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3232.18851)</generator><item><title>Re: the diver could end up (being) stuck too far underwater</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DiverCouldBeingStuckUnderwater/gqlgz/post.htm#583020</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:32:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:583020</guid><dc:creator>Angliholic</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;AlpheccaStars&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Angliholic&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;the diver could end up (being) stuck too far underwater to be able to get up in time to breathe.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The correct form is &amp;quot;being stuck&amp;quot;.The reason is that the phrasal verb &amp;quot;end up&amp;quot; needs a noun for a direct object.. &amp;quot;being&amp;quot; is a gerund, which is used as a noun.&amp;nbsp; Examples from the dictionary are:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;He thought he&amp;#39;d end up living in the city. He ended up marrying his high school sweetheart.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The other sentence is: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;If there were a problem, he would be stuck too far underwater ... &amp;quot;be&amp;quot; does not take a direct object, so the predicate adjective &amp;quot;stuck&amp;quot; is used.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Stuck is the past participle of &amp;quot;stick&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thanks, AlpheccaStars.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But the original (from an English magazine) omits &amp;quot;being,&amp;quot; so I wonder whether it&amp;#39;s better to have &amp;quot;being&amp;quot; or not.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Btw, are there any differences between &amp;quot;&lt;strong&gt;he would end up stuck ...&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;&lt;strong&gt;he would be stuck&lt;/strong&gt; ...?&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: the diver could end up (being) stuck too far underwater</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DiverCouldBeingStuckUnderwater/gqlgd/post.htm#583018</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:16:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:583018</guid><dc:creator>AlpheccaStars</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Angliholic&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;the diver could end up (being) stuck too far underwater to be able to get up in time to breathe.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The correct form is &amp;quot;being stuck&amp;quot;.The reason is that the phrasal verb &amp;quot;end up&amp;quot; needs a noun for a direct object.. &amp;quot;being&amp;quot; is a gerund, which is used as a noun.&amp;nbsp; Examples from the dictionary are:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He thought he&amp;#39;d end up living in the city. He ended up marrying his high school sweetheart.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The other sentence is: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If there were a problem, he would be stuck too far underwater ... &amp;quot;be&amp;quot; does not take a direct object, so the predicate adjective &amp;quot;stuck&amp;quot; is used.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stuck is the past participle of &amp;quot;stick&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Re:  intricate</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Intricate/2/gqjzz/Post.htm#582425</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:10:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:582425</guid><dc:creator>AlpheccaStars</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;MIA6&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;&lt;span style="color:navy;"&gt;Here is another example: We listen to Fagin __ and share her tormented feelings.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;&lt;span style="color:navy;"&gt;A.talk to Nancy. B. talking to Nancy. I chose A since I thought that would make the sentence parallel, but the answer was B. So&amp;nbsp;is that everytime we see &amp;quot;listen&amp;quot;, we have put&amp;nbsp;verb-ing form after it?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;Let&amp;#39;s take this one step at a time:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;We listen to Fagin.&amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt; This is a complete sentence (main clause); &amp;quot;listen to&amp;quot; is the phrasal verb, and Fagin is the object.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;But could Fagin be doing?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; talking, screaming, yelling, running, and so on. For example:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;Fagin&amp;#39;s loud talking drove me crazy.&amp;nbsp; ---&amp;gt; you see that talking is a noun here (a gerund, and the subject of verb &amp;quot;drove&amp;quot;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;Fagin&amp;#39;s talking softly to Nancy in a dark corner of the room made Jim jealous!&amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt; here is another example, but the gerund phrase has a lot of other words with it.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;So what do we listen to? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;We listen to Fagin&amp;#39;s talking to Nancy. --&amp;gt; this was the correct form 100+ years ago.&amp;nbsp; (with Fagin being in possessive case, and talking the direct object. However, in modern times, this form has dropped out of usage,&amp;nbsp; Instead, we use the gerund as attached to the noun &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;We listen to Fagin talking to Nancy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;The second part of the sentence now is clearer:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;We listen (to Fagin talking to Nancy) and share her tormented feelings. (&amp;quot;we&amp;quot; is the subject of share. Apparently we see her expressions of torment and empathize with her. Maybe they talking about something very painful to her) &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;But, Fagin could also be doing the sharing, not &amp;quot;we&amp;quot;! Then the sentence changes:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;We listen to (Fagin talking to Nancy and sharing her tormented feelings).&amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt; Now we are just listening to Fagin&amp;#39;s talking and his sharing Nancy&amp;#39;s feelings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;There is another construction using dependent clauses:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;We listen to Fagin who is talking to Nancy and share her tormented feelings. ---&amp;gt; now there is a full dependent clause with a subject and verb. (who is talking to Nancy).. We is still the subject of &amp;quot;share&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="left"&gt;We listen to Fagin (who is talking to Nancy and sharing her tormented feelings). ---&amp;gt; . the dependent clause is == who is talking to Nancy and sharing her tormented feelings</description></item><item><title>Re: I am looking forward to (meet / meeting)? you</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LookingForwardMeetMeeting/5/zxhbd/Post.htm#488430</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:02:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:488430</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><description>.&lt;br /&gt;There must be some way to alert non-native speakers that native teachers of English and trained ESLs generally know what they are talking about.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Did you read this thread, Anon?&amp;nbsp; Do we really have to waste our energies repeating ourselves over and over?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;The verb is--&amp;gt; &amp;#39;to look forward to&amp;#39; = &amp;#39;to anticipate&amp;#39; (transitive = requires a direct object).So, the direct object should be the gerund (noun) form of the verb &amp;#39;to meet&amp;#39;, i.e. meeting.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;The actual problem in this case is, that &amp;quot;to&amp;quot; is a preposition here andNOT part of the infinitive! Therefore the Gerund is required.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;The phrasal verb &amp;#39;look forward to&amp;#39; must be followed by a noun or, as in this case, a gerund, which is a noun equivalent.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;Here are just a few cases where &lt;em&gt;to&lt;/em&gt; is a preposition, not part of an infinitive.&amp;nbsp; The &lt;em&gt;-ing&lt;/em&gt; form is used with all prepositions; &lt;em&gt;to&lt;/em&gt; is no exception.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;shortcut to learning ...&lt;br /&gt;approach to studying ...&lt;br /&gt;key to learning ...&lt;br /&gt;objection to going ...&lt;br /&gt;secret to knowing ...&lt;br /&gt;path to learning ...&lt;br /&gt;aversion to doing ...&lt;br /&gt;reference(s) to going ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;object to, look forward to, pay attention to, take exception to, taketo, resort to, get around to, contribute to, devote time to, amount to&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;be:&lt;br /&gt;restricted to, limited to, reduced to, used to, accustomed to, averse to, given to, committed to&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;Most learners get confused by the infinitive âtoâ, thinking that afterâtoâ the bare form of the verb must be followed. &amp;nbsp;In fact, it&amp;#39;s theopposit.&amp;nbsp;A structure with â looking forward toâ is always follow by adirect object (noun or &amp;nbsp;gerund).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.&amp;nbsp; Sometimes I wonder why I am wasting my time here.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Gramatical Mistakes Common to Chinese English-speakers</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GramaticalMistakesCommonChinese-EnglishSpeakers/2/zjdnk/Post.htm#462920</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 06:14:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:462920</guid><dc:creator>Hoa Thai</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi HbLaw,&lt;/p&gt;



&lt;p&gt;Goodman gave a good list. I like to add a few more from my
own list of mistakes:&lt;/p&gt;



&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; A/an vs.
the. For this one alone, there are at least 50 rules!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Verbs that
may be followed by infinitives or gerunds, in addition to phrasal verbs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Countable
vs. uncountable. I still struggle with this one, especially when I use abstract words.&lt;br&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Usage of prepositions. This one is the killer! â part of what Goodman listed as âIncorrect choice of wordâ.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: got up to</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GotUpTo/vphdc/post.htm#409855</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:10:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:409855</guid><dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;He&amp;nbsp;has got up to protest the gangsters, but I think that is not good for us. They may harm us as well for the only reason we are their neighbours.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;I applied this meaning&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;got up to = get up to sth phrasal verb UK&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;to do something, often something that other people would disapprove of:&lt;BR&gt;e.g. She's been getting up to all sorts of &lt;B&gt;mischief&lt;/B&gt; lately.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;Grammatically, you need a noun, or at least a gerund. eg&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;He&amp;nbsp;has got up to protesting/a protest of&lt;FONT color=#ff1493&gt;/about&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;the gangsters&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;But in terms of usage, there are some problems.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;You 'get up to' something trivial. In the example in your definition, 'mischief' is a trivial activity.&amp;nbsp;Protesting about gangsters is not trivial. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;Also, by the definition you yourself quote, you 'get up to' something that other people would disapprove of. Protesting about gangsters sounds like something normal people should approve of, unless you live in such a strange and lawless culture that the normal thing is for&amp;nbsp;everyone to be afraid to protest about gangsters.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best wishes, Clive&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Posting in here is instrumental to me because....</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PostingInstrumentalBecause/2/vlhqg/Post.htm#390428</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:15:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:390428</guid><dc:creator>Goodman</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Cool Breeze wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Goodman wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt; 
&lt;P&gt;"Participating&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt; on&lt;/FONT&gt; the board ..." is the correct prep. from where&amp;nbsp; I stand.&lt;img src="/emoticons/emotion-2.gif" alt="Big Smile [:D]" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hi Goodman&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I see. In other varieties of English &lt;I&gt;participate&lt;/I&gt; takes &lt;I&gt;in&lt;/I&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;parÂ·ticÂ·iÂ·pate, v., -patÂ·ed, -patÂ·ing.&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;âv.i.&lt;BR&gt;1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; to take or have a part or share, as with others; partake; share (usually fol. by &lt;FONT color=#ff0000&gt;&lt;B&gt;in&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;): to participate in profits; to participate in a play.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(RHUD)&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, the noun &lt;I&gt;board&lt;/I&gt; takes &lt;I&gt;on&lt;/I&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;He is no longer &lt;B&gt;on&lt;/B&gt; the &lt;B&gt;board&lt;/B&gt; of directors.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CB&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hi CB,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SUB&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;After rethinking what you said, yes, you are right.&amp;nbsp; "Participate &amp;nbsp;in" in this case is used as phrasal verb but in gerund form. &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SUB&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SUB&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;What I was thinking was, panel, board, forum, roster team etc. all take âonâ as it phrasal preposition. i.e.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SUB&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SUB&gt;on the board, on the roster on the team etc...&lt;/SUB&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Look forward to + -ing</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LookForwardToIng/vbhhx/post.htm#341153</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 04:34:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:341153</guid><dc:creator>Wolfrolf</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br&gt;Look forward to needs an -ing verb regardless of it being a state verb or a verb of sensation.&amp;nbsp; We know that these verbs are not usually used in continuous tenses but it doesn't mean that they can't be used as &lt;b&gt;gerunds&lt;/b&gt;.&amp;nbsp; The problem is that we generally think that gerund (like in 'I like &lt;b&gt;fishing&lt;/b&gt;.') and continuous ('I &lt;b&gt;am fishing&lt;/b&gt;.') are the same thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gerunds are half verb / half nouns.&amp;nbsp; You can use state verbs as gerunds like in the sentence, &lt;b&gt;'Knowing she was there he went to see her.'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/b&gt;Continuous tenses can be recognised because they have the verb be as auxiliary verb (be careful with -ing adjectives. &lt;b&gt;'I am boring.' &lt;/b&gt;is not a continuous sentence.&amp;nbsp; It only means that I am not an interesting person.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a conclusion, the &lt;b&gt;-ing &lt;/b&gt;verb after look forward to and any other phrasal verb is not a continuous tense, it's a gerund so, the restriction of verbs of sensation and state verbs doesn't apply here.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: except</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Except/dcqhg/post.htm#265138</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:55:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:265138</guid><dc:creator>Aperisic</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;except&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;The museum is open daily except Monday(s).Preposition? &lt;B&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;Yes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The government has few options except to keep interest rates high. Conjunction? &lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;No, preposition.&amp;nbsp;except (as conjuction) = unless&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt; (&lt;EM&gt;to keep interest rates high&lt;/EM&gt; is an option, not&amp;nbsp;a sentence or part of it)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/B&gt;The government has to keep interest rates high except they decide otherwise. Conjunction&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;It's cool and quiet everywhere except in the kitchen. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;Preposition? &lt;B&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;Yes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Everyone was there except for Sally.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;Preposition? &lt;B&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;No, an expression.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR&gt;There is nothing to indicate the building's past, except for the fireplace. Preposition? &lt;B&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;No, an expression.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;There was nothing interesting to do except sit around... . Preposition? &lt;B&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;Yes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;1 There was nothing interesting to do except sit around.&lt;/FONT&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;sit around (phrasal verb) is the &lt;U&gt;object&lt;/U&gt; of the preposition -- should it not be&amp;nbsp; a &lt;U&gt;noun&lt;/U&gt;&amp;nbsp; (sitting around = gerund) regarding its lexical function?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;Yes but &lt;EM&gt;There was nothing interesting to do except (to) sit around&lt;/EM&gt;. is OK as well&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;2 Everyone was there except for Sally. Preposition? &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;&lt;B&gt;No, an expression. &lt;EM&gt;except for&lt;/EM&gt; is usually more indirect, &lt;EM&gt;The house was perfect except for the roof, which we quickly fixed.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;The prep is "except for"? &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;&lt;B&gt;No, it is an expression that can be used similar to except&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>except</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Except/dcqhb/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:30:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:265133</guid><dc:creator>Inchoateknowledge</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;except&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The museum is open daily &lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;except&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/B&gt; Monday(s).&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Preposition?&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The government has few options &lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;except&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; to keep interest rates high. &lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;Conjunction?&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR&gt;It's cool and quiet everywhere &lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;except&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/B&gt; in the kitchen. &lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;Preposition?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;Everyone was there &lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;except&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;B&gt;for&lt;/B&gt; Sally.&lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;Preposition&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;There is nothing to indicate the building's past, &lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;except for&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; the fireplace. &lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;Preposition&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There was nothing interesting to do &lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;except&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; sit around... . &lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;Preposition?&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Let us take these sentences:&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1 There was nothing interesting to do &lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;except&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;sit around.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;sit around&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt; (phrasal verb) is the &lt;U&gt;&lt;FONT color=#ff1493&gt;object&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/U&gt; of the preposition -- should it not be&amp;nbsp; a &lt;FONT color=#ff1493&gt;&lt;U&gt;noun&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;(sitting around = gerund) regarding its lexical function?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2 Everyone was there &lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;except&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;B&gt;for&lt;/B&gt; Sally. &lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;Preposition&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;The prep is "except for"?&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>