<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Grammar tag:Articles' matching tags 'Grammar' and 'Articles'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aGrammar+tag%3aArticles&amp;tag=Grammar,Articles&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Grammar tag:Articles' matching tags 'Grammar' and 'Articles'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3125.9045)</generator><item><title>Re: "The pair without rim/a rim/ the rim is mine."</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PairWithoutMine/3/gjbwn/Post.htm#545781</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:02:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:545781</guid><dc:creator>Ant_222</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;New2grammar&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Yes. Thanks for the correction.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Actually I didn&amp;#39;t meat it as such: In the beginning of the thread Marius proposed an article-less version, and I am not sure he was wrong!</description></item><item><title>Re: Why definite article?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhyDefiniteArticle/gwmrn/post.htm#543911</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:05:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:543911</guid><dc:creator>Ant_222</dc:creator><description>Thanks!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I belive &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; is used in phrases like &amp;quot;You are the victim of...&amp;quot; for exactly the same reason... That&amp;#39;s interesting, I have never seen this mentioned in a grammar book.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;This is a review of a great book&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;This is the procuct of a bright mind&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;-- absolutely identical structure, but different articles.&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: An article</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AnArticle/gwlhl/post.htm#543739</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:27:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:543739</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><description>People often omit articles in emails, but your example is not one of &amp;quot;correct grammar.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; Without the article, we may wonder if he means &amp;quot;I don&amp;#39;t recall [ever] seeing production schedule&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;s&lt;/span&gt; distributed from you,&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, I&amp;#39;m not comfortable with &amp;quot;distributed.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; Depending on the customs in your industry, I&amp;#39;d think it might be &amp;quot;distribution.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; What process is he referring to, exactly?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp; - A.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Edit.&amp;nbsp; I believe Feebs has it.&amp;nbsp; Others have received your distribution; your emailer has not.</description></item><item><title>Video Learning: Articles</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/VideoLearningArticles/gwdjb/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:40:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:541451</guid><dc:creator>Punkybrewster</dc:creator><description>English Lesson produced by &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.elanguest.com"&gt;Elanguest&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;Grammar - &lt;strong&gt;Using Indefinite Ariticles&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;#39;a&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;an&amp;#39;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.englishforums.com/English/VideoLearningArticles/gwdjb/post.htm"&gt;&lt;img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/Zr_Fv2UnTYc/default.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Verb to be</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/VerbToBe/gwcrh/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:43:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:541015</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>In grammar class, when we refer to a root form of a verb, we always add a &amp;#39;to&amp;#39; before the verb, such as: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The uses and forms of the &lt;font color="#cc0033"&gt;verb to be..&lt;/font&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;Using the &lt;font color="#cc0033"&gt;verb &amp;#39;to go&lt;/font&gt;&amp;#39; combined with particles..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#c00000;"&gt;Verb to do..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#111111;"&gt;Why? Can we just say:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The uses and forms of the &lt;font color="#cc0033"&gt;verb&amp;nbsp;&amp;#39;be&amp;#39;.....&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Using the &lt;font color="#cc0033"&gt;verb &amp;#39;go&lt;/font&gt;&amp;#39; combined with particles..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks in advance for reply.</description></item><item><title>Re: do the paper cutting</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DoThePaperCutting/ghjkx/post.htm#538302</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:32:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:538302</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><description>.&lt;br /&gt;1. In the office his job is to do the paper cutting.-- &lt;strong&gt;The grammar is OK&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;(Does this mean that he cuts important news articles out of the paper? --&lt;strong&gt; No, it means he has the menial task of cutting paper into smaller sizes.&amp;nbsp; I think there is a word for the occupation you intend, but it has slipped my mind.&lt;/strong&gt;)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. Have you finished doing the paper cutting? --&lt;strong&gt; The grammar is OK&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/em&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: a gritty urban drama about ***</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AGrittyUrbanDramaAbout/ghgwl/post.htm#537398</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:18:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:537398</guid><dc:creator>izzy12</dc:creator><description>can anybody help me by checking my grammar, what&amp;#39;s wrong or bad in it?&lt;br /&gt;because i&amp;#39; in a process of learning to make an article, so i need to practice all the time,&lt;br /&gt;and for sure need a feed back.</description></item><item><title>Re: new swimsuit</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/NewSwimsuit/ghbdc/post.htm#535859</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:13:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:535859</guid><dc:creator>optilang</dc:creator><description>&lt;br /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;New2grammar&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;This new swimsuit gives [the] swimmers an unfair advantage.&lt;br /&gt;Is the definite article optional?&lt;br /&gt;Thanks&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The swimmers - if we know which swimmers it refers to&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Swimmers - applies to all swimmers who wear the swimsuit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This new swimsuit gives the swimmer an unfair advantage - this applies to all swimmers who wear the swimsuit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: When the teacher (had) arrived, they stopped talking.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TeacherArrivedStoppedTalking/2/ghrpk/Post.htm#535782</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:21:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:535782</guid><dc:creator>Ant_222</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;New2grammar&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;My problem with definite and indefinite articles is less than with definite/indefinite pronouns. I think I&amp;#39;m starting to see other and another as indefinite articles, my as definite article and mine as indefinite article.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#39;s no such corellation, except for &amp;quot;another&amp;quot;, which is in fact &amp;quot;an&amp;quot; + &amp;quot;other&amp;quot;, so dont&amp;#39; need to think of these words as capable of rendering a noun definite or indefinite on their own.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Take by my hand&amp;quot; â how can it be definite when we don&amp;#39;t no which hand is in question?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Your English is better than mine&amp;quot; â how can it be indefinite when it&amp;#39;s a comparison of the English skills of two people?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;... And so on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;New2grammar&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;I have to say referring to other, another, my, mine as definite/indefinite is something new to me.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We didn&amp;#39;t refer to this words alone. It were noun phrases buit therewith that we called definite or indefinite. And since nouns can be (in)definte, that&amp;#39;s all right.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: TOEIC/ very big room</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ToeicVeryBigRoom/ghrbk/post.htm#535544</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 03:20:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:535544</guid><dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator><description>&lt;span style="COLOR:#ff00ff;"&gt;Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#4040ff;"&gt;How soon can you finish this report?&lt;br /&gt;(A) I can have it for you by tomorrow morning.&lt;br /&gt;(B) I&amp;#39;m expecting an important call soon.&lt;br /&gt;(C) This is very big room.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;The answer for this Question-Response item is A, no doubt about it.&lt;br /&gt;But, Why isn&amp;#39;t there an article &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; before &amp;quot;very big room&amp;quot; in answer C? Is that just missing or intentional? Please advise. &lt;span style="COLOR:#ff00ff;"&gt;Without the article, C is not correct grammar. I don&amp;#39;t know why it was omitted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best wishes, Clive&lt;/span&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>