By Learning English, Auxiliaries

Compare:Who saw you? >>> "Who" is the subject. You were seen by somebody.Who did you see? >>> "Who" is the object. You saw somebody. (Strictly speaking, this one should be "Whom did you see?" ... but in everyday conversations "Who did you...

Thank you to all those who have posted their suggestions to my little imagination game. Some have taken it very seriously thinking they would have to relearn English after the 'changes'. This was meant to be just a game, not for those wo take everything seriously, and of course in this game...

You certainly have a knack for languages given the fact you only have been learning English for a mere year. Have does not carry meaning in perfect tenses; it is just a grammatical auxiliary verb.

Soylista wrote:I am confused with this expression, "will be going to + Vb". eg. I will be going to visit Aunt Carol tomorrow.To me, this expression is sort of redundant. Why do you need to use both "will" and "be+going to"? I somewhat understand the differences between future meaning...

"a" is more common but "b" is not so bad."Both" in attributive uses commonly behaves like a middle-positional adverb in its position.The middle-positional adverbs are positioned like:(1) When the main verb is not "be" and the main stands as a finite (=tense/person bearing) verb, the adverbs are...

Hi Melaine! Although i am learning english as a second language, i will try to explain your problem. Well your problem is related to "Subject-verb agreement". In every sentence subject and verb should agree with each other. Remember that Have is a plural auxiliary verb and Has is singular. So...