In Nouns^x, Conditionals^x, Clauses^x

This is my take: The use of "would rather" is not restricted by time. In certain aspects, it contains a conditional element as well. Here is some info. Hope that helps your question. <EDITED by mod to credit your source .>

. -- I agree that there is often an option; nevertheless, in your sentence, a specific power source is implied-- i.e the power supplied at where 'they' are. .

Structure reconstruction. ( dots mean that this part of sentence is not changed) Reconstruct the following sentences (or pairs of sentences) in such a way that they are as similar as possible in meaning to the ones printed before them. Make all necessary alteraction. Use the info provided...

I tried to solve this lil test but i couldnt figure out all answers. Would you be so kind and help me with it? I have no answer key for it so I can't compare my answers with correct ones and im not sure of my answers :( I hope that u'll find some time to help :) read the following...

It's just a standard type 3 conditional. This expresses a hypothesis on what would have happened if the "if" clause, which is no longer possible to fulfil, had been fulfilled. It is formed as follows: if + pronoun + past perfect clause + pronoun + would + perfect infinitive clause.

Hi, It has been a long time since I saw last. You asked me to help you to do better at your English class. Have you tried reading more like easy-to-read novels? That can help you to get better at understanding word meanings and thus increase your comprehension. Not only reading helps you to...

Thank you. You wrote: If the preposition is in the middle of the sentence, 'whom' would be necessary. To me using the word "seem" in a "would" clause seems very peculiar. Omiting the word "would" from the "would" clause also seems peculiar. To...

Hi, 1. Is this conditional? No. 2 Conditional, perhaps? What troubles me is I think I saw all these variations in the if--clause. Is this possible? I would appreciate it if you can call/would calll/could call/call this person as soon as possible. 2. Is this structure possible? It's a little...

Goodman wrote: Yoong Liat wrote: Neeraj Jain wrote: Hi Goodman, I guess that you cannot use "troubles". The right word is "trouble". Goodman wrote: Jain is saying that you should use 'trouble' , not 'troubles'. Trouble is usually an uncountable noun. Are you having trouble with your...

Yoong Liat wrote: Neeraj Jain wrote: Hi Goodman, I guess that you cannot use "troubles". The right word is "trouble". Goodman wrote: Jain is saying that you should use 'trouble' , not 'troubles'. Trouble is usually an uncountable noun. Are you having trouble with your car? get/run into...