<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Nouns' matching tag 'Nouns'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aNouns&amp;tag=Nouns&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Nouns' matching tag 'Nouns'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Debug Build: 3110.25895)</generator><item><title>Re: Where to</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhereTo/ghknm/post.htm#538640</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:09:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:538640</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Liveinjapan&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Nouns or pronouns can refer to something&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; Yes.  In this definition of &amp;quot;refer&amp;quot;, the noun or pronoun always refers to its counterpart in the real world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am looking at a table here, for example.&amp;nbsp; When I use the word &amp;quot;table&amp;quot;, I expect my listener to know that I am referring to that object here before me that I am looking at.&amp;nbsp; The word &amp;quot;table&amp;quot; refers to the real table.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Expanding this idea further, when you have sentences like these:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Mike went home early.&amp;nbsp; Then he went to sleep.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;both the word &amp;quot;Mike&amp;quot; and the word &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; refer to the same person in the real world, so we sometimes say that &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; refers to &amp;quot;Mike&amp;quot;, when actually &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; refers to Mike (no quotes).&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; does &lt;u&gt;not&lt;/u&gt; refer to another &lt;u&gt;word&lt;/u&gt; (&amp;quot;Mike&amp;quot;), but to a &lt;u&gt;person&lt;/u&gt; in the real world -- Mike -- just as &amp;quot;Mike&amp;quot; refers to Mike.&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;Mike&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; are coreferential; that is, they both refer to the same person in the real world.&amp;nbsp; We use the terms loosely, however, and people often say that &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; refers to &amp;quot;Mike&amp;quot; in those sentences. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CJ&amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Re: pluralization of a gerund/verbal noun</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PluralizationGerundVerbalNoun/ghkmc/post.htm#538613</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:08:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:538613</guid><dc:creator>Mr Wordy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;With some verbs, yes. It depends on whether the &amp;quot;-ing&amp;quot; form of the verb is a recognised countable noun. For example, &amp;quot;there was a pounding&amp;quot; is fine, as is &amp;quot;poundings of the heart&amp;quot;. On the other hand, &amp;quot;existings&amp;quot; (to pick an example at random) is unnatural because you never talk of &amp;quot;an existing&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure there&amp;#39;s any way to tell which verbs fall into which category except through experience of the language.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>pluralization of a gerund/verbal noun</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PluralizationGerundVerbalNoun/ghkkp/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:40:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:538592</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think I heard&amp;nbsp;someone&amp;nbsp;using the words like &amp;quot;poundings&amp;quot; as in &amp;quot;poundings of a heart.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Can we make a plural out of a gerund or what CB seemed to have called a verbal noun?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Re: Where to</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhereTo/ghkkm/post.htm#538589</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:20:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:538589</guid><dc:creator>Liveinjapan</dc:creator><description>Thanks, Marius and CJ.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nouns or pronouns can refer to something; Clauses can relate, be related, be associated with, or examples of something.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Got it! &lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>methods and criteria</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/MethodsAndCriteria/ghkwq/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 22:18:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:538559</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;How should I write what looks to be headings of methods and criteria. I am not sure how should&amp;nbsp;one arrange/write the wording of the headings (especially in terms of countability and uncountability&amp;nbsp; of the nouns involved).&lt;br /&gt;Some examples:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Methods:&lt;br /&gt;Point of contact -- using opportunities to build relationships with people&lt;br /&gt;Lecture (why not &amp;#39;Lectures&amp;#39;?? if it is countable)&lt;br /&gt;Large and small groups&lt;br /&gt;Impression and expression&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are *** criteria that should be understood ...&lt;br /&gt;TEACHERS&lt;br /&gt;LOCATION OF THE ROOM&lt;br /&gt;CLIMATE OF THE GROUP&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Where to</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhereTo/ghkwg/post.htm#538549</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:57:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:538549</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Liveinjapan&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;What does the clause that starts with deciding refer to?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; Yes, I noticed that post later, and then I had a better idea of what you wanted in this post.&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;refer to&lt;/i&gt; is not exactly correct, in my opinion, although it&amp;#39;s understandable.&amp;nbsp; Strictly speaking, only nouns and pronouns can refer.&amp;nbsp; I think you want to say:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What are the clauses that start with &lt;i&gt;deciding&lt;/i&gt; associated with (earlier in the sentence)?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;or&amp;nbsp; What are the clauses that start with &lt;i&gt;deciding&lt;/i&gt; related to (earlier in the sentence)?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;or How do the clauses that start with &lt;i&gt;deciding&lt;/i&gt; relate to the rest of the sentence?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;or What are the clauses that start with &lt;i&gt;deciding&lt;/i&gt; examples of?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CJ&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Re: essential</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Essential/ghkdj/post.htm#538467</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:26:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:538467</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><description>&amp;nbsp;Yes.&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;essential &lt;/i&gt;is the adjective.&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt; essence&lt;/i&gt; is the noun.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Compare:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;evidential - evidence&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;circumstantial - circumstance&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;providential - providence&amp;nbsp;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CJ&amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Re: felt pity to / for</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FeltPityToFor/2/ghjqv/Post.htm#538394</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:39:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:538394</guid><dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Vincent Teo&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Why ? the position can be noun (pity) and adjective (happy) after the verb &amp;quot;felt&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Eg, I felt happy (adj) / pity (noun). &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Yes.&amp;nbsp; the verb &lt;strong&gt;feel&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;can be either transitive or intransitive.</description></item><item><title>Re: felt pity to / for</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FeltPityToFor/2/ghjpp/Post.htm#538388</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:33:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:538388</guid><dc:creator>Vincent Teo</dc:creator><description>Why ? the position can be noun (pity) and adjective (happy) after the verb &amp;quot;felt&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Eg, I felt happy (adj) / pity (noun).</description></item><item><title>Re: felt pity to / for</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FeltPityToFor/ghjpr/post.htm#538373</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:10:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:538373</guid><dc:creator>Vincent Teo</dc:creator><description>Should I know the position of the verb?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She felt pity (pity is a noun? or adjective?)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Normally, we say , she felt happy / sad (as a position of adjective)</description></item></channel></rss>