<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Past tenses tag:Tenses' matching tags 'Past tenses' and 'Tenses'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aPast+tenses+tag%3aTenses&amp;tag=Past+tenses,Tenses&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Past tenses tag:Tenses' matching tags 'Past tenses' and 'Tenses'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3161.22795)</generator><item><title>Re: about tense</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AboutTense/gmrrr/post.htm#560082</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:32:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:560082</guid><dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#0000bf;"&gt;I have a question about tense in this sentence below.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#0000bf;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;My family has&amp;nbsp;been in&amp;nbsp;this rural village&amp;nbsp;for&amp;nbsp;generations, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;so I never had to commute by crowded&amp;nbsp;public transport.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The person &amp;quot; I &amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; have no experience of commuting by crowded transport &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;until now&lt;/span&gt;. However, &amp;quot;&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;had&lt;/span&gt; to&amp;quot; is the past tense. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please teach me why &amp;quot;had &amp;quot; can be used in this case?&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#111111;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;#39;I never had to commute . . .&amp;nbsp; &amp;#39;&lt;/strong&gt; The use of the past tense suggests that the speaker no longer lives there at the present time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;eg &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#0000bf;"&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#111111;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;My family has&amp;nbsp;been in&amp;nbsp;this rural village&amp;nbsp;for&amp;nbsp;generations, so I never had to commute by crowded&amp;nbsp;public transport &lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;until I moved to the&amp;nbsp;big city where I live now&lt;/span&gt;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#111111;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;#39;I have never had to commute . . . &amp;#39;&lt;/strong&gt; Use the Present Perfect to stress &amp;#39;until now&amp;#39;, ie this&amp;nbsp;sounds like &amp;#39;I&amp;#39; still live in the village.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best wishes, Clive&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description></item><item><title>about tense</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AboutTense/glqqk/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:23:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:560075</guid><dc:creator>momento</dc:creator><description>I have a question about tense in this sentence below.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;My family has&amp;nbsp;been in&amp;nbsp;this rural village&amp;nbsp;for&amp;nbsp;generations, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;so I never had to commute by crowded&amp;nbsp;public transport.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The person &amp;quot; I &amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; have no experience of commuting by crowded transport &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;until now&lt;/span&gt;. However, &amp;quot;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;had&lt;/span&gt; to&amp;quot; is the past tense. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please teach me why &amp;quot;had &amp;quot; can be used in this case? &lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: In ''If I had any problem I would contact you'' past tense is used</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProblemWouldContactPastTenseUsed/glxlr/post.htm#559402</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:24:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:559402</guid><dc:creator>Ant_222</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#39;re right. To make it&amp;nbsp;a true&amp;nbsp;past situation: Â«If I had had any problem I would have contacted youÂ», otherwise it&amp;#39;s a&amp;nbsp;time-less (still possible at the moment of speech) and hypothetical.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>In ''If I had any problem I would contact you'' past tense is used</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProblemWouldContactPastTenseUsed/glxkg/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:41:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:559391</guid><dc:creator>Jackson6612</dc:creator><description>Had I any problem I would contact you. = If I &lt;strong&gt;had&lt;/strong&gt; any problem I &lt;strong&gt;would&lt;/strong&gt; contact you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In &lt;i&gt;If I &lt;strong&gt;had&lt;/strong&gt; any problem I &lt;strong&gt;would&lt;/strong&gt; contact you&lt;/i&gt; past tense is used. What is the reason for using past tense when the situation is not really in the past. I believe it&amp;#39;s because the situation is just being imagined and past tense is used to present such as hypothetical situation. Am I correct?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>was sure vs. thought</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WasSureVsThought/glnzb/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:18:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:559012</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;I am going make some sentences using the subject-noted words:&lt;br /&gt;Scenario: Two people are talking about the missing pen. One person thought the other took it since the other&amp;nbsp;seemed to&amp;nbsp;have been the only one in the room when the supposed disappearance of the pen occurred (at least that is what he thought). Then, later found out that the pen was stuck in his briefcase, making it hard to see.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A: I think you thought I stole your pen, didn&amp;#39;t you?&lt;br /&gt;B: I was sure that&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt; is/was&lt;/span&gt; the case&amp;nbsp;since you were only one in the room at the time of disapperance, but later found out, the pen was stuck on the bottom of my briefcase -- it was my mistake; I should have looked inside of&amp;nbsp;the briefcase more carefully. Sorry.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As far as I can see, every verb is in the past tense except the underlined part. I feel the underlined part could either be in the present or in the past; I think the verb could be in the present since the subject matter is currenly related to the discussion and to people on hand -- unlike the cases involving the use of &amp;quot;thought,&amp;quot; which will make almost mandatory for the verbs to be in the past.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why is that if two tenses are OK? being sure of something and thinking about&amp;nbsp;something seem to be a very similar mental activity.</description></item><item><title>form of the past tense</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FormOfThePastTense/glmdz/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:06:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:558693</guid><dc:creator>eagerness</dc:creator><description>Is there any difference in the meaning between the following two sentences?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I didn&amp;#39;t play smart enough, so that is why I ended up being at the bottom four&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;or&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I wasn&amp;#39;t playing smart enough, so that is why I ended up being at the bottom four.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Since an English is not my native langauge, sometimes I am in dilemma as to&amp;nbsp;which form of the past tense I should use.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any help is greately appreciated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: tense checking</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TenseChecking/glmbj/post.htm#558663</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:10:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:558663</guid><dc:creator>Grammar Geek</dc:creator><description>&amp;nbsp;I should have edited the post - they are clearly related, but the first three seemed unrelated to each other.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I broke them into each line so I could comment one by one.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;I think the probable date I noted for his visit is one month from
the day of writing&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;b&gt;You wrote&lt;/b&gt;, &amp;quot;If I sleep one more day, I will be meeting my nephew who will be visiting us from the Phillipines.&amp;quot; &lt;b&gt;That sounds like he is coming tomorrow to me. How could I guess that it&amp;#39;s actually another month away? You wrote that &lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;he&amp;#39;s coming home &amp;quot;for a month vacation.&amp;quot; It sounds like he&amp;#39;s coming tomorrow, and staying for one month. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/b&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;i&gt;and I think I also have noted that the probable
period&amp;nbsp;of completion will last two months.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;What made you think the
writing gives out an idea that I will try to finish the project in one
day?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;You said that he comes tomorrow, and you are starting today - so naturally that sounds like you&amp;#39;ll do one month&amp;#39;s worth of work in one day. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;You changed the tense of the last sentence to&amp;nbsp;present
perfect; (semicolon OK?)&amp;nbsp;but I don&amp;#39;t think a past is wrong but a
present tense is better because the choice made is current and
currently related.&lt;/i&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Yes, you made the decision quite recently. The present tense is appropriate. If you used the past, the entire thing should be written in a past tense, not the present.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Where did you want to use the semi-colon?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>tense Present vs Past</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TensePresentVsPast/gllcb/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:40:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:558383</guid><dc:creator>sophianz</dc:creator><description>Hi. Please help me understand the sentence below.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Among the crimes for which Hitler &lt;strong&gt;bears&lt;/strong&gt; direct responsibility was the attempt to exterminate the Jews.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Q1) &amp;nbsp;Is it&amp;nbsp;gramatically correct&amp;nbsp;to use the present tense &amp;quot;bears&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;for Hitler, who does not exist any more?&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I think that the past tense &amp;quot;bore&amp;quot; would be more appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Q2)&amp;nbsp; If both are gramatically correct, what is the difference in meaning between &amp;quot;bears&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;bore&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hope your reply. Thanks.</description></item><item><title>Re: Structure of sentence</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/StructureOfSentence/glwzz/post.htm#557571</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:21:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:557571</guid><dc:creator>lisadove</dc:creator><description>16: is &lt;strong&gt;known&lt;/strong&gt; as (passive structure; active form: We know Boston as the Hub...)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;17. storing, erasing and &lt;strong&gt;retrieving&lt;/strong&gt; (These are parallel and should be in the same form.)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;18. &lt;strong&gt;Professor&lt;/strong&gt; Andom Iyassou (&amp;quot;Professor&amp;quot; is a title.&amp;nbsp;If Andom Iyassou is one person, &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot; must be singular.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;19. one mile &lt;strong&gt;high&lt;/strong&gt; (&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;height&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; is a noun; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;high&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; is an adjective)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;20. a &lt;strong&gt;symbol&lt;/strong&gt; (t&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ree&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; is singular and&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;a&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; is singular, so &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;symbol&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;should be&amp;nbsp;singular)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;21. as efficient &lt;strong&gt;as&lt;/strong&gt; (the conventional structure&amp;nbsp;for a comparison. &amp;quot;so efficient as&amp;quot; could be used as follows: The software is not &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;so efficient as&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; to make the previous version obsolete.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;22. I suspect you made a mistake in copying this item. I would guess (C) &amp;quot;&lt;strong&gt;for&lt;/strong&gt; a great deal of their content &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;on&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; the majority of their pages.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;23. very much &lt;strong&gt;alike&lt;/strong&gt;. (&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;alike&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; is not a noun; only nouns can be preceded by &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;the&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;24. &lt;strong&gt;in&lt;/strong&gt; seconds (we use &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;in&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; with expressions of time: in a few days, in a million years, in about an hour.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;25. Boggs &lt;strong&gt;hit&lt;/strong&gt; a grand slam (&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;making&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; is used in the first part because it&amp;#39;s the object of the preposition &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;after&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, so it must be in noun [gerund?] form. The main clause is &amp;quot;Wade Boggs hit [past tense] a grand slam for the Red Sox.&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don&amp;#39;t have&amp;nbsp;time&amp;nbsp;to do&amp;nbsp;more; perhaps someone else will finish...</description></item><item><title>Re: California tax</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CaliforniaTax/glwcg/post.htm#557521</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:13:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:557521</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><description>.&lt;br /&gt;It is the computer that is singular, not &amp;#39;that&amp;#39;.&amp;nbsp; However, the computer has already been bought and paid for.&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt; Cost&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; is past tense.&lt;br /&gt;.</description></item></channel></rss>