<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Past tenses' matching tag 'Past tenses'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aPast+tenses</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Past tenses' matching tag 'Past tenses'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>XMOD (Build: 3616.28671)</generator><item><title>Re: Passive &amp; Active Voice</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PassiveActiveVoice/lkmkk/post.htm#971524</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:29:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:971524</guid><dc:creator>tanit</dc:creator><description>Hi, I&amp;#39;d change these:  5. The sun was eclipsed by the moon.  ACTIVE  PASSIVE  9. This bone has been  buried  by the dog . PASSIVE  10. It takes a long time to think of these examples . PASSIVE  ACTIVE  13. There was a cup of coffee on the table but now  it&amp;#39;s  gone. ACTIVE  15. Mark was given one month to write this book . ACTIVE  PASSIVE  As far as your #14 is concerned, I am not sure everybody would agree on this.   14. I was born under a wandering star  I was taught that this is technically a passive form, but some regard it as active (Cambridge dictionary lists the verb &amp;quot; be born &amp;quot;). For instance, here&amp;#39;s what some of our most prominent members wrote in the forums. (Opinions are split)  Clive ( from this post&lt;</description></item><item><title>Re: HELP!!! independent clauses connected with ,and</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HelpIndependentClausesConnected-And/lkdpm/post.htm#969710</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:36:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:969710</guid><dc:creator>billj</dc:creator><description>I thought have was needed before  spread to keep a single tense. That would be a good solution: 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  They have appeared on message boards and in blogs and have spread by word of mouth.  
   
 There are no dependent clauses here, by the way --- just an independent clause with a compound predicate. 
  
 CJ 
 
  
  
 This is not a question of predicate, compound (whatever that means) or otherwise. 
  
 This is a straightforward example of a compound sentence containing TWO independent clauses, linked by the conjunction &amp;#39; and &amp;#39;&amp;#39; : 
  
   and   .  
  
 You can tell there are two clauses because there are TWO VERBS ( have appeared  and  have spread , or the passive have been spread  ).  A clause...</description></item><item><title>Re: Problems with mixed tenses exercises</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProblemsMixedTensesExercises/lkzjz/post.htm#969563</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:07:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:969563</guid><dc:creator>clive</dc:creator><description>Hi, 
 Welcome to the Forum. 
  
 Problem 1: img687.imageshack.us/img687/4138/testnx.jpg It&amp;#39;s much easier for us to respond if you actually post the question here. Most of us don&amp;#39;t want to go off and start searching other sites. It takes time and often makes it harder for us to make edits and to respond in a quick way. 
 I&amp;#39;ve got doubts concerning number 7 (love). According to the key there are 2 possible answers &amp;quot;love/loved&amp;quot;. My question is: why is Present Perfect impossible here? To my Polish ear, it just sounds perfect 
  
 Problem 3: At the dentist&amp;#39;s 
 I was on time for my dentist&amp;#39;s appointment, but the dentist was still busy with another patient, so I (1)..(sit) in the waiting room and (2).....</description></item><item><title>Problems with mixed tenses exercises</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProblemsMixedTensesExercises/lkzjz/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:14:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:969464</guid><dc:creator>chudziol</dc:creator><description>Hi, I&amp;#39;m a Pole trying to explore the intricacies English  This is my first post here so, welcome everybody. And here are my problems. I&amp;#39;ve done these tests and I even got the key, but there is no freaking way I can understand some answers. Wondering now if it&amp;#39;s really so difficult or I&amp;#39;m just so stupid  Ok, let&amp;#39;s go:   Problem 1: img687.imageshack.us/img687/4138/testnx.jpg I&amp;#39;ve got doubts concerning number 7 (love). According to the key there are 2 possible answers &amp;quot;love/loved&amp;quot;. My question is: why is Present Perfect impossible here? To my Polish ear, it just sounds perfect    Problem 2: img80.imageshack.us/img80/9406/focusj.jpg Number 20. Can we put &amp;quot;was shutting&amp;quot; here? Or maybe the action of...</description></item><item><title>Re: Is this sentence correct?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IsThisSentenceCorrect/ljmjh/post.htm#966703</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:26:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:966703</guid><dc:creator>billj</dc:creator><description>Hi 
  
 No, I&amp;#39;m afraid it&amp;#39;s not correct. The problem is your use of the verb &amp;#39;go&amp;#39;. You tried to use the negative form of the simple past tense and wrongly assumed it was &amp;#39;did not went&amp;#39;. 
  
 This is a tricky aspect of English verbs which causes many problems. I&amp;#39;ll try to explain: In questions the simple present and past tenses are replaced by the the relevant tenses of the verb &amp;#39; to  do &amp;#39; + the basic (infinitive) form of the verb. The same also applies to the simple tenses in conjunction with &amp;#39; not &amp;#39; when we want to form the negative: 
   
     I really went there.        (past tense - positive)       
      Did you really go there?     (past tense - question) 
    You did not really go...</description></item><item><title>Re: Short story</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ShortStory/ljhwd/post.htm#966124</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:51:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:966124</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>I have a better idea: I'll give you a short story, and then you write it in different tenses, and we'll check your efforts. Here's one in past tense; please change it to present:      The Ant and the Grasshopper In a field one summer's day a Grasshopper was hopping about, chirping and singing to its heart's content. An Ant passed by, bearing along with great toil an ear of corn he was taking to the nest. "Why not come and chat with me," said the Grasshopper, "instead of toiling and moiling in that way?" "I am helping to lay up food for the winter," said the Ant, "and recommend you to do the same." "Why bother about winter?" said the Grasshopper; we have got plenty of food at present." But the Ant went on its way and continued its toil....</description></item><item><title>Re: Doubts in Participle.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DoubtsInParticiple/ljjmb/post.htm#965764</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:15:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:965764</guid><dc:creator>clive</dc:creator><description>Hi,  
 I have doubt in a sentence. 
 &amp;quot;I have reviewed the attachment which u had sent&amp;quot; Can you please let me if the grammar usage in this sentence is correct.  
 I&amp;#39;m puzzled. You care about tenses, but not about spelling the word &amp;#39;you&amp;#39; correctly.  
   
 I see no reason here to use Past Perfect. 
 &amp;quot;I have reviewed the attachment which you sent&amp;quot; 
  &amp;quot;I have reviewed your attachment.&amp;quot;  
    
 Best wishes, Clive</description></item><item><title>Re: Reg past tense "Had"</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/RegPastTenseHad/lwlrn/post.htm#961319</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:33:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:961319</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>'Have' has far too many uses to examine on this thread. Here is one dictionary's list:   HAVE    –verb (used with object)    1.  to possess; own; hold for use; contain: He has property. The work has an index.        2.  to hold, possess, or accept in some relation, as of kindred or relative position: He wanted to marry her, but she wouldn't have him.        3.  to get, receive, or take: to have a part in a play; to have news.        4.  to experience, undergo, or endure, as joy or pain: Have a good time. He had a heart attack last year.        5.  to hold in mind, sight, etc.: to have doubts.        6.  to cause to, as by command or invitation: Have him c</description></item><item><title>"because malcolm had never become a cutthroat CEO, he had few enemies"</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseMalcolmNeverBecomeCutthroat-Enemies/lwbmj/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:22:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:958537</guid><dc:creator>mkyol</dc:creator><description>I would like someone to confirm my thoughts on the following sentence, to see if I am on the right track or am just in fantasy lala land, going off on a tangent: &amp;quot;Because Malcolm had never become a cutthroat CEO, he had few enemies.&amp;quot; I am pondering about the above sentence, in terms of the tense used.  I think the sentence is trying to convey that sometime in the past, Malcolm had few enemies, and this is because going further back into the past from that point, Malcolm was never a cutthroat CEO (he never became one during that time).  Compare the above sentence with the following sentence, written in simple past tense: &amp;quot;Because Malcolm never became a cutthroat CEO, he had few enemies.&amp;quot; In this case, I think that...</description></item><item><title>Re: "Used to"</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/UsedTo/lhkrq/post.htm#956092</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:28:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:956092</guid><dc:creator>cool breeze</dc:creator><description>Does that mean that you can&amp;#39;t use it when you are supposed to be using the past participle, or that you just use &amp;quot;used to&amp;quot; whether or not its in the past or past participle?    Used to is used in the past tense only. For other tenses other expressions are needed. For example:   It has always been his custom/habit to get up early.  He has been in the habit of getting up early all his life.   CB</description></item><item><title>Re: Passive</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Passive/qnkj/post.htm#955504</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:48:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:955504</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>I just want to point out the word &amp;quot;could&amp;quot; is indicative of the subjunctive mood Modal verbs don&amp;#39;t have tenses and moods in the way that other verbs do.  could certainly acts  like a past subjunctive in    If I could help you, I would.   but could , like several other modals, can act in other ways as well, including as a conditional or a simple past.   CJ</description></item><item><title>Re: Can you proofread this? Please!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CanYouProofreadThisPlease/lgmgg/post.htm#953798</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:22:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:953798</guid><dc:creator>cyberduck</dc:creator><description>Hi there! You&amp;#39;re welcome :) Usually, for stories, Past Simple is used, being the narrative tense. For example, in your fragment, the so-called assassin seems to be describing the events that took place one after the other during the day he met that girl. For such, you have to use Past Simple. You can clearly notice the use of tenses if you read a bit from an English book ;)   Good luck!    PS: What other passage?</description></item><item><title>Re: Which one is correct ?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhichOneIsCorrect/lgwph/post.htm#950829</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:29:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:950829</guid><dc:creator>andreabritobabapulle</dc:creator><description>You have used double past tenses, and I really would recommend that you do not use short forms because the tenses go haywire .. I did not got time is wrong because the words &amp;quot;did not&amp;quot; is always followed by the present tense..i.e.I did not get time(collective), I did not get money (collective),I did not get enough food (collective), I did not hear (present tense verb), I did not see (present tense verb).. etc.. The word &amp;quot;got&amp;quot; is best used to say you received it &amp;quot;I got a dose of medicine&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I Got sick&amp;quot;..Gotten is American and not frequently used in countries where American English is not taught.</description></item><item><title>Re: Stay</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Stay/lgzjd/post.htm#950244</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:46:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:950244</guid><dc:creator>avangi</dc:creator><description>jemaasjr is right about the question. In US grammar school, we used to run through the tenses:  present tense  -  I stay, do stay, am staying.   We rarely use &amp;quot;I do stay&amp;quot; in this exact form, but it&amp;#39;s absolutely essential for questions and negative statements.  Do you often stay up late?  Don&amp;#39;t stay up too late!    past tense  -  I stayed, did stay, was staying   (The second one is defined as the past tense of &amp;quot;to do&amp;quot; plus the bare infinitive.)     Did you stay for the end of the game?  I didn&amp;#39;t stay to see the fireworks.</description></item><item><title>Re: Stay</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Stay/lgzjd/post.htm#949866</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:55:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:949866</guid><dc:creator>jemaasjr</dc:creator><description>Did you stay up all night in preparation for your study?   How come in this sentence instead of stayed we use stay, the reason I ask is  because the sentence begins with a past tense  verb  (did )? Is it because of the modal rule(do/did) so stay is in its base form?     
 
 Normal
 0
 
  
  
  
  
 
 MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
 
 

 

 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:&amp;quot;Table Normal&amp;quot;;
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-parent:&amp;quot;&amp;quot;;
	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin:0in;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:&amp;quot;Times New...</description></item><item><title>How come</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HowCome/lgzwd/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:33:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:949793</guid><dc:creator>pleasehelp</dc:creator><description>I didn&amp;#39;t know you had it in you -- past tense   and   I don&amp;#39;t know you have it in you -- present tense    These two sentences are basically the same sentences but in different tenses but how come they sound and essentially mean different things?</description></item><item><title>Re: Had to/have to</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HadToHaveTo/lgzgh/post.htm#949791</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:29:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:949791</guid><dc:creator>pleasehelp</dc:creator><description>Are there any examples where we mix and match present tense, past tense, or even future tenses?   I think I&amp;#39;ve recently heard some and it&amp;#39;s messing my logic up. Or ppl around me were just not speaking proper English?</description></item><item><title>Re: Major issues</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/MajorIssues/lgzgn/post.htm#949787</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:26:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:949787</guid><dc:creator>pleasehelp</dc:creator><description>When it&amp;#39;s past tense it&amp;#39;s past tense..present...present tense... idk why I&amp;#39;m making this harder on myself...   Do we every mix and match tenses ever? Such as past tense....present tense..etcetc...because I think I might&amp;#39;ve heard some and gotten it mixed up...   Any input?</description></item><item><title>Re: Past tenses for grade 9</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PastTensesForGrade9/lzzgc/post.htm#946415</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:39:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:946415</guid><dc:creator>jackderrick</dc:creator><description>These articles are all good.   This will help with the Past Simple - Click Here  This will help with the Past Continuous - Click Here  This is great for a summary of the two - Click Here  And this helps with the pronunciation of regular past simple verbs - Click Here   This is a story that also helps with the past tenses - Click Here</description></item><item><title>Re: Grammar</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Grammar/lzhnv/post.htm#945834</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 08:44:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:945834</guid><dc:creator>cool breeze</dc:creator><description>Now if I look up &amp;quot;are,&amp;quot; the dictionary tells me that it is the present plural of &amp;quot;be.&amp;quot; But what I would expect is that it would tell me that it is the present plural of &amp;quot;am&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;is&amp;quot; because those are the verbs I actually use if I want the singular of &amp;quot;are.&amp;quot;  MM has given you agood answer; I&amp;#39;ll just elaborate a little.   It is obvious that you have never been taught the forms of to be and how to use them. (It&amp;#39;s never too late to start! ) Are can be singular or plural, by the way.    A. the full/complete infinitive: I want to be   here.  Used after many verbs such as want, expect, desire etc. Also used after adjectives and there are other uses.   B. the plain/bare infinitive =...</description></item><item><title>Re: Grammar</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Grammar/lzhnv/post.htm#945721</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:02:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:945721</guid><dc:creator>jemaasjr</dc:creator><description>Something I want to know, is way they use &amp;quot;to be&amp;quot; as the lexeme when the first persion singular &amp;quot;is&amp;quot; seems more obvious, at least to me.   The tenses I was obliged to learn in school were future perfect, future, present, past and past perfect.</description></item><item><title>Re: I bet...</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IBet/lzhmh/post.htm#945557</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:12:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:945557</guid><dc:creator>yankee</dc:creator><description>The verbs in your sentences have different tenses.    I  bet  I  stopped  listening before you  did .   bet  = simple present tense   stopped  = simple past tense   did  = simple past tense (The word &amp;quot;did&amp;quot; is used as a replacement for &amp;quot;stopped&amp;quot;.)    Your second sentence contains a pretty unlikely tense combination, in my opinion. In fact, it strikes me as simply being bad grammar: I  bet  I&amp;#39; ve stopped  listening before you  did .   bet  =  simple present tense   &lt;span id="" style="color:rg</description></item><item><title>Re: Past tenses for grade 9</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PastTensesForGrade9/lzzgc/post.htm#944894</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 07:16:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:944894</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>HERE  is a good display of the verb tenses, and  HERE  is a list of the common irregular verbs.</description></item><item><title>Past tenses for grade 9</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PastTensesForGrade9/lzzgc/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 05:18:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:944845</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>i want to teach my daughter the past tenses in english as she is very week . 
  
 THANK U TO SEND ME THE BEST AND SIMPLE LINK I CAN USE TO TEACH HER .</description></item><item><title>Re: The logic of tenses</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TheLogicOfTenses/lzcjq/post.htm#944390</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:48:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:944390</guid><dc:creator>dimsumexpress</dc:creator><description>For some reason, &amp;quot;cake&amp;quot; is a sweet obsession in everyone&amp;#39;s mind! 
 It would seem to me that past perfect is an overkill. John ate the whole cake yesterday. One single past event, completed! 
  
 Past perfect always includes 2 past events with one preceding the other. 
 Mary had baked a cake before John arrived yesterday. He ate the whole thing after eveyone went to bed!</description></item><item><title>Re: If I didn't</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IfIDidnt/lzbvg/post.htm#943873</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:45:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:943873</guid><dc:creator>pleasehelp</dc:creator><description>I thought it was in the opposite direction from where you were headed.   The sequence of tenses takes precedence. Backshifts are nearly mandatory after verbs of knowing and thinking in the past. That is, once you&amp;#39;ve got thought or knew (or a verb of similar meaning in the past tense), the whole sentence goes into the past. It doesn&amp;#39;t have to make sense; it&amp;#39;s just the way it is.      But the article on wikipedia says that there are times when you do mix the tenses:  One view is the natural sequence of tenses . According to this
view, the tense of a verb in a subordinate clause is not determined by
the tense of the verb in the superordinate clause, but is determined
simply according to the sense of the clause taken apart...</description></item><item><title>Re: If I didn't</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IfIDidnt/lzbvg/post.htm#943851</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:00:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:943851</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>I thought it was in the opposite direction from where you were headed.   The sequence of tenses takes precedence. Backshifts are nearly mandatory after verbs of knowing and thinking in the past. That is, once you&amp;#39;ve got thought or knew (or a verb of similar meaning in the past tense), the whole sentence goes into the past. It doesn&amp;#39;t have to make sense; it&amp;#39;s just the way it is.     I knew it was there.  He thought you were ready.  _____     Both of the following express a situation in present time and its consequences in the future.    If I don&amp;#39;t have to go, I probably won&amp;#39;t be stopping by.     If I didn&amp;#39;t have to go, I probably wouldn&amp;#39;t be stopping by.     The use of the past tense in the second if clause is...</description></item><item><title>If I didn't</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IfIDidnt/lzbvg/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:36:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:943659</guid><dc:creator>pleasehelp</dc:creator><description>Scenario:   I&amp;#39;m planning to drop off some stuff at my uncle&amp;#39;s place before I leave for vacation, because I&amp;#39;m moving to another apartment and there&amp;#39;s just too much stuff for storage.  (has not happened yet)    A:  Why are you going to your Uncle&amp;#39;s place, I thought it&amp;#39;s/was the opposite direction to where you are/were headed?   Do we sometimes use the past tense to describe something that hasn&amp;#39;t happened or is in the future?     B:  If I didn&amp;#39;t/don&amp;#39;t have to go, I probably won&amp;#39;t be stopping by..   Shouldn&amp;#39;t it be don&amp;#39;t since didn&amp;#39;t is in past tense? But I&amp;#39;m talking about something in the future that hasn&amp;#39;t happened yet.  Why would I say: If I didn&amp;#39;t have to go, I probably...</description></item><item><title>Re: Present perfect and simple past</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PresentPerfectSimplePast/lvnxp/post.htm#942544</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:12:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:942544</guid><dc:creator>clive</dc:creator><description>Hi, 
 But are the tenses used correctly? 
  
 Yes, they are. 
  
 Clive</description></item><item><title>Re: Present perfect and simple past</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PresentPerfectSimplePast/lvnxp/post.htm#942468</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:27:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:942468</guid><dc:creator>pleasehelp</dc:creator><description>But are the tenses used correctly?</description></item><item><title>Re: What tense is this sentence in?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhatTenseIsThisSentenceIn/lvkpr/post.htm#941828</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:39:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:941828</guid><dc:creator>cool breeze</dc:creator><description>They had to have that specially made?  The sentence is in the past tense. Since English lacks verbs for situations in which person A does something for person B on person B&amp;#39;s request, a rather long and awkward structure is used instead: to have something done . Have is the finite verb, in other words, the verb that shows tense . The past participle has absolutely nothing to do with tense as it is always required regardless of the tense.   Other examples of the same structure in various tenses: Present tense: He has his house painted every five years.  Past tense: He had his house painted last week.  Present perfect: He has had his house painted twice.  Past perfect/Pluperfect: He had had his house painted needlessly.  Present...</description></item><item><title>RE: Questionaire on The '13' Tenses</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/QuestionaireOnThe13Tenses/lvjbd/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:09:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:941004</guid><dc:creator>fromwalestojapan</dc:creator><description>These are the tenses I had to choose between; Present Simple, Past Simple, Present Continuous, Past Continuous, Present Perfect, Past Perfect, Present Perfect Continuous, Past Perfect Continuous, Future with &amp;#39;Going To&amp;#39;, Future Simple, Future Continuous, Future Perfect, and, Future Perfect Continuous. 
  
 Phew! 
  
 And here are my answers.. 
  
 1.  Mark went for a job interview last week.   1- Past Simple 2.  I work from 6.00am until 1.00pm every day.  2- Present Simple 3.  Mark will be 48 next May.    3- Future Simple 4.  Snow melts when the temperature rises.   4- Present Simple 5.  No, thanks, I’ve just had a coffee.   5- Past Perfect 6.  I wish I had a better-paid job.    6- Present Perfect Continuous 7.  I was having...</description></item><item><title>Re: tenses</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Tenses/lvwnm/post.htm#940948</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:05:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:940948</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Matt: the bold-faced words are an example of the past perfect (had + past participle). For example: We HAD already EATEN (from 6 - 6:30 p.m.) when you arrived at 7 p.m. So there was no food left for you. In your sentence, however, we have what is called a past conditional in which something did NOT happen. For example: If Mona HAD CALLED me last night (she didn&amp;#39;t), I WOULD HAVE BEEN happy (I wasn&amp;#39;t). So in your sentence, you would have passed (you didn&amp;#39;t) IF you HAD STUDIED (you didn&amp;#39;t).</description></item><item><title>Re: tenses</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Tenses/lvwnm/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:41:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:940928</guid><dc:creator>fromwalestojapan</dc:creator><description>If only I had studied harder, I would&amp;#39;ve passed my exams. 
  
 Is the structure highlighted in this sentence Past Perfect Continuous? 
   
   
 MATT</description></item><item><title>Re: tenses</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Tenses/lvwnj/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:37:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:940925</guid><dc:creator>fromwalestojapan</dc:creator><description>She has been married for one year. 
  
 Is this, PAST PERFECT CONTINUOUS or, PRESENT PERFECT CONTINUOUS? 
   
   
   
   
 MATT</description></item><item><title>Re: About the tools</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AboutTheTools/ldlzk/post.htm#936799</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:47:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:936799</guid><dc:creator>gleb_chebrikoff</dc:creator><description>Vincent Teo,   (a) is open to objection since the sequence of tenses is neglected here. Besides, it formally suggests that the action of &amp;#39;coming by&amp;#39; took place against the background of some longer, continuous action - in this sense &amp;#39;take&amp;#39; is impossible, since it implies momentary action in this very case.   (b) - if your intention is to place emphasis on the duration of your waiting him, resort to past progressive. Simple past in this instance focuses on the mere fact of waiting.   (c) is correct. The second underlined part features the infinitive of purpose.   (d) * unforgetful  is not a word. Forgetful means &amp;#39;apt to forget&amp;#39;. If you talk about a woman&amp;#39;s beauty, charm, etc. you may say that she is...</description></item><item><title>Re: Simple past</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SimplePast/lcpdw/post.htm#932989</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:46:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:932989</guid><dc:creator>clive</dc:creator><description>Hi, 
 I just feel that I hear and use: Maybe. But do you talk a lot to native speakers? 
 
  I&amp;#39;ve done this, she&amp;#39;s this, he&amp;#39;s that, we&amp;#39;ve been planning, they&amp;#39;ve got a nice car, she  has the same sweater as I... 
  
 The example in pink is Simple Present. 
   
 Anyway, you need to know a variety of tenses, don&amp;#39;t you? You can&amp;#39;t just learn one or two tenses if you expect to have good English. 
   
 Best wishes, Clive</description></item><item><title>Re: Is it correct ?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IsItCorrect/lclbk/post.htm#932025</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:46:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:932025</guid><dc:creator>clive</dc:creator><description>Hi, 
 Please note that  the  75% of the materials have been returned to us upon completion of the work / Please note that  the  75% of the materials were returned to us upon completion of the work 
  
 Both tenses are OK, but give different meanings. 
   
 Present Perfect indicates that an event in the past has relevance to the present situation. 
 Simple Past simply states that an event happened at some point in the past.  
   
 Clive</description></item><item><title>Re: Can someone proof read my essay for me?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CanSomeoneProofReadEssay/lrmnq/post.htm#922685</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:47:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:922685</guid><dc:creator>benny777</dc:creator><description>Hello, I enjoyed reading your essay, it appears that it is a descriptive essay...am I correct? The main task that you seemed to want to complete was to provide vivid details of your experience, in order to help the reader feel like they could envision the place right in front of them. You did this quite well, as the essay went on I felt like I was going to the singing contest with you and your friend. I like how you mentioned that the floating balloons and kites were the first clue that you were nearing the event, and I like how you described what people wore, how you and your friend interracted, and even how the contest itself actually worked. 
 With all of that said, I believe aside from a few grammatical issues, there is still a very...</description></item><item><title>Re: NEED HELP EDITING MY PARAGRAPH (OF MICE AND MEN)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/NeedEditingParagraphMice/lrdvh/post.htm#919728</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 03:40:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:919728</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>I have underlined some problem areas:     IN ONE PARAGRAPH PROOF THAT GEORGE AND LINNIE ARE TRUE FRIENDS.  A true friend sticks with you through the good and the bad times. George and Linnie dream is friendship. Friendship plays a major role in the book " Of Mice and Men". Because the dream  is so extraordinary, their companionship was special. Although, they are more characters in the novel such as Candy, Slim, Carlson, and Crooks, but their closeness wasn't like George and Linnie . Firstly, Lennie isolated from other men on the ranch because of his mental disability, which does not allow him to participate in any social activities. George being a true friend always there for Linnie, for example he constant went to the bunk house and...</description></item><item><title>Re: English is hard to learn because ...</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EnglishHardLearnBecause/2/bxvj/Post.htm#918525</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 04:27:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:918525</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>English is a difficult language to adopt as a second language for so many reasons. Your point about learning Japanese is irrelevant to this &amp;#39;why English is difficult&amp;#39; conversation. In places like Canada, did you know the reason for having so many different newspapers is because of the reading level that each one has adopted? The lowest reading level being that of a fourth grader. English has tenses, which in turn, all have subtenses (past, past continuous, past perfect etc.) Like the first quote, if two words have the same spelling, it depends if it is a verb or a noun for how it is pronounced. And yes, it does matter how coherent and fluent you are in English because when you don&amp;#39;t have your prepositions, conjunctions,...</description></item><item><title>Re: Tenses and Sentence function</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TensesAndSentenceFunction/kpqxz/post.htm#914319</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:914319</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>* I work from 6.00am until 1.00pm every day. -  Present simple, a routine (P)    * Snow melts when the temperature rises. -  Present simple (I), 'a scientific or general truth.'    * She has been married for one year. -  Present perfect (J)    * At 10.30 I was driving to London, as I had missed the train. - Past perfect (B)    * They'll definitely have completed the job by Monday. - Future Perfect (R)    As CJ or another moderator has already told you, just look at the grammar– don't get distracted by all the real-world events that might have happened before, during or since.</description></item><item><title>Grammar Past Perfect</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GrammarPastPerfect/kqblc/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:43:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:914296</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Could anyoune please explain to me the use of the tenses in the following sentence:   &amp;quot;The dull headache I&amp;#39;d had since I killed him had gone.&amp;quot; (Winterson 1987, The Passion, 137)   My question is why after the word &amp;quot;since&amp;quot; the verb is in the past simple. Didn&amp;#39;t the act of killing precede the headache and its &amp;quot;going&amp;quot;? So why use the past simple tense to describe killing and the past perfect to refer to the facts that clearly ensued after the act of killing.   Many thanks to everyone who gives her or his explanation.</description></item><item><title>Re: Past perfect?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PastPerfect/kqrqd/post.htm#914112</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 05:47:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:914112</guid><dc:creator>ticce</dc:creator><description>WHat about - I would pay - in this case? Doesn&amp;#39;t it refer to the Present or Future Tenses? It turns out that the first part of the sentense says about the Present (Future) and the second about the Past...... is it ok?   Whould it be better just to say   I would pay once we are paid</description></item><item><title>Tenses and Sentence function</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TensesAndSentenceFunction/kpqxz/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:05:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:913772</guid><dc:creator>jeroden2504</dc:creator><description>Hi, I have been working through an exercise, the majority of it went well, but I just need someone to help me to clarify some of the answers below.   The assignment first covers the &amp;#39;Tense&amp;#39; of the question, followed by the function.   Thank you for help. It is much appreciated.     The Problem   Tenses: -   Present Simple  Past Simple  Present Continuous  Past Continuous  Present Perfect  Past Perfect  Present Perfect Continuous  Past Perfect Continuous  Future with “Going To”  Future Simple  Future Continuous  Future Perfect  Future Perfect Continuous     Functions: -  
A.  	A completed action at a specified time in the past 
B.  	An action that happened before a specified time in the past 
C.  	A definite future event 
D. ...</description></item><item><title>Re: Proper conversation usage</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProperConversationUsage/kpgpz/post.htm#911145</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:19:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:911145</guid><dc:creator>grammar geek</dc:creator><description>You can wait more than 45 minutes before assuming no one will answer your post. Some of us even sleep at night. 
  
  
 In another thread you said you didn&amp;#39;t understand the perfect tenses. 
  
 There is the present perfect tense: I haven&amp;#39;t spoken to him. 
 There is the past perfect tense: I hadn&amp;#39;t spoken to him. 
  
 The present perfect connects in some way to the present. It relates a past event to something now. 
 The past perfect is for a past event that is even further in the past than something else. 
  
 in your original, you refer to a time in the past, and say that it had been even further in the past since you last spoke. That&amp;#39;s the past perfect. 
  
 In your more recent post, you&amp;#39;re talking to...</description></item><item><title>Re: Past tense trouble</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PastTenseTrouble/kpgvg/post.htm#910914</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:24:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:910914</guid><dc:creator>clive</dc:creator><description>Hi, 
  
 Then don&amp;#39;t worry about the Perfect tenses until you get a chance to study them. 
  
 Clive</description></item><item><title>Re: The Use of "Double" As an Adjective and Mixing Tenses in a Sentence</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TheDoubleAdjectiveMixingTenses-Sentence/kprkp/post.htm#909187</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:08:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:909187</guid><dc:creator>clive</dc:creator><description>Hi, 
 I want to convey that &amp;quot;Next Week, at a certain place, I expect to have double the number of people that are here today.&amp;quot; But I want to make this statement tomorrow -- after today&amp;#39;s party is over. I made something like this: 
 
  
 Next Saturday, I expect to have double the number of people that were present yesterday.  Sounds OK. 
  
 I made this sentence-formation becuase it felt right but I see following two problems. Please advise: 
  
 (1) Next Saturday, I expect to have double the number of people This part has &amp;quot;Next Saturday&amp;quot; (a day in future) and then uses &amp;quot;I expect&amp;quot; (present tense). Then, in the second part &amp;quot; that were present yesterday&amp;quot; past tense is used. Years ago, my...</description></item><item><title>The Use of "Double" As an Adjective and Mixing Tenses in a Sentence</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TheDoubleAdjectiveMixingTenses-Sentence/kprkp/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:36:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:909090</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>I want to convey that &amp;quot;Next Week, at a certain place, I expect to have double the number of people that are here today.&amp;quot; But I want to make this statement tomorrow -- after today&amp;#39;s party is over. I made something like this:   Next Saturday, I expect to have double the number of people that were present yesterday.   I made this sentence-formation becuase it felt right but I see following two problems. Please advise:   (1) Next Saturday, I expect to have double the number of people This part has &amp;quot;Next Saturday&amp;quot; (a day in future) and then uses &amp;quot;I expect&amp;quot; (present tense). Then, in the second part &amp;quot; that were present yesterday&amp;quot; past tense is used. Years ago, my teacher told me that I should never...</description></item><item><title>Tense and Time References</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TenseAndTimeReferences/kxlhv/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:02:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:907294</guid><dc:creator>jeroden2504</dc:creator><description>Hi, I have just finished my assignment concerning sentences tenses and time references. It was a little difficult, but I managed. It would be great, if someone could tell me if I am on the right track.  Feedback would be greatly appreciated  Thank you for your help.   My answers have been written in &amp;#39;Italics.&amp;#39;    Exercise  

 Please look through the following sentences and firstly state which tense is being used (please 
concentrate on the highlighted verbs only) and secondly decide whether the time which the sentence refers to is 
the present , the past or the future :
    I&amp;#39; m travelling to London next week.  -  Present Continuous  -  Future  I wish I had more time to finish this exercise. -  Past Simple  -  Present ...</description></item></channel></rss>