<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Perfect Progressive' matching tag 'Perfect Progressive'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aPerfect+Progressive</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Perfect Progressive' matching tag 'Perfect Progressive'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>XMOD (Build: 3616.28671)</generator><item><title>Re: When will we use perfect progressive tense in a sentence?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhenPerfectProgressiveTenseSentence/lqhpg/post.htm#999672</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:46:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:999672</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>What is your question? Please put important information like that inside your post message.</description></item><item><title>Re: Participle in past perfect progressive or adjective in past perfect</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ParticiplePastPerfectProgressive-AdjectivePastPerfect/hcdkh/post.htm#900359</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:44:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:900359</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Had and been are both helping verbs. Helping verbs must help action verbs. In this sentence, had and been are helping the present participle making , which is an action verb. Because making is a present participle, it must have helping verbs to help it.</description></item><item><title>Re: Fill in the blanks using perfect progressive aspect</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FillBlanksUsingPerfectProgressive-Aspect/kkvlg/post.htm#885708</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:15:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:885708</guid><dc:creator>grammar geek</dc:creator><description>As we discussed in chat, we will review assignments and offer suggestions. You absolutely need to try to answer these yourself first.    (Note: 3 and 6b won&amp;#39;t be in the perfect progressive.)   You got &amp;quot;It has been raining&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Matt had been working&amp;quot; so far. Can you do the rest?</description></item><item><title>Fill in the blanks using perfect progressive aspect</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FillBlanksUsingPerfectProgressive-Aspect/kkvlg/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:58:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:885689</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>1. It__(rain) ever since we got here. I wish it would stop! 
 2. Matt __________(work) on computer virus for nearly a year before he realized that nothing could destroy it. 
 3. I&amp;#39;m very pleased. I__(find) the picture you mentioned in the newspaper. 
 4. Lately John__(find) life without Mary more and more difficult. 
 5. Gladstone______(cook) all afternoon. I hope the food will be as delicious as it smells. 
 6. Jeff (a)__(look) for his car keys for over an hour, when he realized that he(b)__(leave) them in the car.</description></item><item><title>By 1878+past perfect or past simple?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/By1878PastPerfectPastSimple/kjpcg/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:39:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:883802</guid><dc:creator>jesusengland</dc:creator><description>Hello. 
  
 By 1878 +past perfect (or past perfect progressive) or past simple (or past continuous)? 
  
 Thanks.</description></item><item><title>Re: "Past Probability + Tenses" combo</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PastProbabilityTensesCombo/kwrxr/post.htm#875635</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:43:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:875635</guid><dc:creator>youngbuddy</dc:creator><description>1 Simple Past 
 Where was he last night?     &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;  Simple Past He may have been at his house last night.   &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Present Perfect     The question is in the form of &amp;quot; simple past &amp;quot; , so the answer should be as well.  Where was he last night ? He was in the cinema yesterday. He would be in the cinema yesterday ( to show possibility )    2 Present Perfect 
 He may have been in this country for years.  
 (Not a past probability; included present moment) &amp;gt;&amp;gt; present perfect is used to describe an action that happened in the past ( not a specific time ), that might not be finished yet.     He may have been in this country for years. ( showing possibility, either been or not in the country for years)      3 Past...</description></item><item><title>Re: "Past Probability + Tenses" combo</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PastProbabilityTensesCombo/kwrxr/post.htm#875152</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:06:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:875152</guid><dc:creator>akdom</dc:creator><description>Thank you, CalifJim, YoungBuddy, Mister Micawber 
  
 Here are what I&amp;#39;ve learned so far. See if I got them right. 
  
 Expressing Past Probability with &amp;quot;may have&amp;quot;  in different scenarios:  
 1 Simple Past 
 Where was he last night? He may have been at his house last night. 
  
 2 Present Perfect 
 He may have been in this country for years.  
 (Not a past probability; included present moment) 
  
 3 Past Perfect 
 He may have left before we came. 
  
 4 Past Perfect Progressive 
 He may have been taking the drug for years before we noticed anything. 
 5 Past Progressive 
 When the cops showed up last night, what was he doing? I don’t know. He may have been  taking a shower. 
   
   
 1, 2, 3...</description></item><item><title>Re: Since</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Since/jxldz/post.htm#823743</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:20:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:823743</guid><dc:creator>fandorin</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Since  being adolescent/youth/young age  , he  has showed/has been showing  apathy towards worldly affairs and used to immerse in deep thoughts.&amp;quot;   Don&amp;#39;t forget about comma. There is no use applying Past Perfect. Moreover, it&amp;#39;s inconceivable because person is alive. It&amp;#39;s better to use  Present Perfect/Present Perfect Progressive while using since.</description></item><item><title>Re: When to use "has/have/had been" and "having been"</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhenHaving/jldcc/post.htm#806707</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 02:41:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:806707</guid><dc:creator>avangi</dc:creator><description>In the purest sense, to be is to exist.     There  is  a second moon hidden behind the other one.     No, there  is  not.     Yes, there  is .   &amp;quot;Been&amp;quot; has two other uses in forming various tenses:   The passive voice   -  I am cheated / I have  been  cheated. (present perfect)  (active voice  -  Somebody cheated me.)   The perfect progressive tenses  -  I have been working all day. (present)  I had been working  until the rain started. (past) The verb here is &amp;quot;to work.&amp;quot;   The verb &amp;quot;to be&amp;quot; in its own right uses &amp;quot;been&amp;quot; (past participle) in forming the perfect tenses:   The verb &amp;quot;to be&amp;quot; plus an adjective complement:    I am sick. I have been sick. (present)   I was sick. I had been sick....</description></item><item><title>Re: I've seen vs saw</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IveSeenVsSaw/jgxzc/post.htm#785472</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:29:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:785472</guid><dc:creator>alpheccastars</dc:creator><description>Here are a few examples:   Present perfect: 1) I have seen all the movies in the Star Wars series. 2) He has been to New York two times.   Past Perfect 1) I had been to Rome several times before I travelled to London. 2) She had lived many years in Florida before she died.   Future Perfect 1) By the end of this year, when I get my degree, I will have studied for six years at the university.  2) He boasted that by the time he reaches 40, he will have married three times, and made a fortune.   Progressive:(Uses the -ing form of the verb)  Present: 1) I am studying now. 2) What are you doing ?   Present perfect progressive: 1) I have been living in London for 2 years now.  2) What have you been doing all day?   Passive: (where the subject...</description></item><item><title>Re: Expansion of Aux</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ExpansionOfAux/jzxgn/post.htm#781883</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:38:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:781883</guid><dc:creator>alpheccastars</dc:creator><description>Girls who had been playing were going home - the answer- Past-perfect-progressive  Correct.    Dads who had been in the shops all day came out to enjoy the sun. the answer- past progressive? No. There is no -ing form of the verb in this sentence. It is past perfect (have + past participle of &amp;quot;be&amp;quot;)   The dads who had been working in the shops all day came out to enjoy the sun. - past perfect progressive of &amp;quot;work&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Re: Expansion of Aux</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ExpansionOfAux/jzxgn/post.htm#780583</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:33:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:780583</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>perfect progressive and passive ...   When do you use each of them?  Here&amp;#39;s the quick overview.   Use &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot; when a form of have occurs at the beginning of the verb phrase.  Use &amp;quot;progressive&amp;quot; when an -ing form occurs in the verb phrase.  Use &amp;quot;passive&amp;quot; when a form of be is followed by a past participle at the end.  _________  The rest of this post shows how to apply the information above.   is being recommended   There is no form of have , so it can&amp;#39;t be &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;.  bei ng  makes it &amp;quot;progressive&amp;quot;. A form of be ( being ) followed by a past participle ( recommended ) ends the phrase, so that makes it &amp;quot;passive&amp;quot;. ____   was being    There is no form of have , so it...</description></item><item><title>Expansion of Aux</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ExpansionOfAux/jzxgn/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:06:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:780415</guid><dc:creator>jander52</dc:creator><description>I am trying to figure out when to use perfect progressive and passive when expanding a verb and putting it into a tree diagram.   When do you use each of them?   In the sentence &amp;quot;he is being recommended for the award&amp;quot; the answer is present progressive passive of recomend. Why do we state passive and progressive, what is the reasoning for that?   in the sentence&amp;quot;the witness was being stubborn&amp;quot; the answer is past progressive of be? why is it only progressive and not perfect or passive?</description></item><item><title>Re: "has been and have been" confusion</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Confusion/jdlnq/post.htm#769950</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 04:18:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:769950</guid><dc:creator>alpheccastars</dc:creator><description>Here are some examples of present perfect tense of the verb &amp;quot;to be&amp;quot;   I have been sick since yesterday. ( I got sick yesterday and I am still sick)   He has been late every day this week. ( He was late on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. Today is Thursday, and he was late today, too.)   You have always been my best friend. (You were my best friend in the past, and you are my best friend now.)   This is different. It is the present perfect progressive tense of the verb &amp;quot;live&amp;quot;.   They have been  living next to us for three years. (They moved to the house next to us 3 years ago. They are living there now.)</description></item><item><title>Re: Mega Verb Phrase: "would have had to have been eating"</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/MegaVerbPhraseWouldEating/2/cjzrh/Post.htm#751520</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:36:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:751520</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Your explanation is nearly correct, CJ..however, this is the breakdown: would = subjunctive modal  have had to = perfect tense of the modal replacement(or &amp;quot;semi-modal&amp;quot;, if you prefer), &amp;quot; have to &amp;quot; have been eating= perfect progressive   The point is not that this is &amp;quot;too much verb&amp;quot; but what the CONTEXT of the sentence is:   In reference to a (surmised) action in the past that was in progression up to a certain point in the past, using the perfect progressive after the subjunctive perfect modal(&amp;quot;would have had to&amp;quot;) indicates the past (surmised) action´s ongoing nature.   For example:     &amp;quot;If John had finished his dinner at the restaurant by 8 p.m. (as he later claimed), then he would  have had...</description></item><item><title>Re: Problem with two paragraph grammer</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProblemParagraphGrammer/wxxpr/post.htm#741768</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 03:01:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:741768</guid><dc:creator>alpheccastars</dc:creator><description>Since 1997 MMORPG (Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Game) (1)  be created , until now almost twenty- three years, but many psychiatrists   and psychologists  figure out that most of MMORPG players   are  a ddicted  to the game, and they  are (2) ina bility to stop the activity and  addiction causes trouble in their lives . Investigation shows that MMORPG can affect any people who  long-term play online role-playing game s , and player who is &lt;span style="background-color:rgb(2</description></item><item><title>Post</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProgressiveVerbs/wlvjp/post.htm#723552</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 10:05:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:723552</guid><dc:creator>tanit</dc:creator><description>Hi,   She&amp;#39;s hoping = She is hoping &amp;gt;&amp;gt; present progressive (aka present continuous)   I think &amp;gt;&amp;gt; simple present (NOT progressive)   I/he/she was wondering &amp;gt;&amp;gt; past progressive (aka past continuous)  I expect &amp;gt;&amp;gt; simple present  (NOT progressive)  they&amp;#39;re trying = they are trying &amp;gt;&amp;gt;  present progressive (aka present continuous)    #2 and #4 are not in the progressive form.  A progressive form of a verb consists of the verb &amp;quot; be &amp;quot; (in your examples: is, was, are ) followed by the -ing form of the verb you&amp;#39;re using (in your examples: hoping, wondering, trying )   You can read a very simple explanation of the present progressive here and of the past progressive here . Other tenses may have a...</description></item><item><title>Be wanting to</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BeWantingTo/wkbxh/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 04:15:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:717832</guid><dc:creator>snappy</dc:creator><description>I understand that &amp;quot;I am wanting a new car&amp;quot; is ungrammatical but &amp;quot;I have been wanting a new car&amp;quot; is acceptable.   Is this because &amp;quot;I have been wanting a new car&amp;quot; is in the present perfect progressive tense?   How about the following sentences (in the future progressive tense or past progressive tense)?   1. I&amp;#39;ll be wanting a new car next year. 2. She was wanting a new car, and her father bought it for her.   with &amp;quot;more and more&amp;quot; 3. I am wanting a new car more and more.</description></item><item><title>Re: Present perfect progressive form</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PresentPerfectProgressive-Form/whdrn/post.htm#704052</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:18:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:704052</guid><dc:creator>clive</dc:creator><description>Hi, 
 Are the following expressions gramatically incorrect? No.  
  
  
   
 I have been walking my dog these three years. 
 He has been playing at  the  Wimbledon since he was 18 years old. 
   
 A private English school&amp;#39;s website in Japan says the above expressions should be changed to: 
   
 I have walked my dog these three years.  
 He has played at the Wimbledon since he was 18 years old. 
   
 The site explains that the present perfect progressive form cannot be used to describe people&amp;#39;s habitual activities unless the activities have been in progress without a break. I don&amp;#39;t agree. 
   
    
  e</description></item><item><title>Re:  Present perfect progressive form</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PresentPerfectProgressive-Form/whdrn/post.htm#703481</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:01:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:703481</guid><dc:creator>snappy</dc:creator><description>I have walked my dog these three years. -- OK  
 He has played at Wimbledon since he was 18 years old. -- OK  
  
 The site explains that the present perfect progressive form cannot be used to describe people&amp;#39;s habitual activities unless the activities have been in progress without a break.-- Not true; it merely emphasizes the durational quality. However, I can see that that ambiguity could arise; in that case, it would be wise to choose the non-progressive  
  
  
 I forgot to ask you one more thing. 
 You wrote &amp;quot;ambiguity could arise.&amp;quot; 
 Do you mean &amp;quot;He has been playing at Wimbledon since he was 18 years old&amp;quot; implies that he will continue playing tennis at Wimbledon while &amp;quot;He has played at..&amp;quot;...</description></item><item><title>Re: Present perfect progressive form</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PresentPerfectProgressive-Form/whdrn/post.htm#703457</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:703457</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>.  
 I have been walking my dog these three years. -- OK  
 He has been playing at Wimbledon since he was 18 years old. -- OK  
  
 A private English school&amp;#39;s website in Japan says the above expressions should be changed to: 
  
 I have walked my dog these three years. -- OK  
 He has played at Wimbledon since he was 18 years old. -- OK  
  
 The site explains that the present perfect progressive form cannot
be used to describe people&amp;#39;s habitual activities unless the
activities have been in progress without a break.-- Not true; it merely emphasizes the durational quality. However, I can see that that ambiguity could arise; in that case, it would be wise to choose the non-progressive  .</description></item><item><title>Present perfect progressive form</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PresentPerfectProgressive-Form/whdrn/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:19:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:703439</guid><dc:creator>snappy</dc:creator><description>Are the following expressions gramatically incorrect? 
 
  
 I have been walking my dog these three years. 
 He has been playing at the Wimbledon since he was 18 years old. 
  
 A private English school&amp;#39;s website in Japan says the above expressions should be changed to: 
  
 I have walked my dog these three years. 
 He has played at the Wimbledon since he was 18 years old. 
  
 The site explains that the present perfect progressive form cannot be used to describe people&amp;#39;s habitual activities unless the activities have been in progress without a break.</description></item><item><title>Re: Dancing (for) five years.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DancingForFiveYears/wvndh/post.htm#691701</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:691701</guid><dc:creator>goodman</dc:creator><description>Hi Snappy,   Present perfect progressive can be used to highlight / or emphasize a point.   John has been working on the landscaping of this house for 3 years and still hasn’t come close to getting it finished.  It doesn’t mean that he  continuously works day and night; non-stop on this project.       In this type of context, one may choose to replace “has been working” with “has worked” and still achieve the full meaning he wants to get across.</description></item><item><title>Re: Dancing (for) five years.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DancingForFiveYears/wvndh/post.htm#691649</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:18:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:691649</guid><dc:creator>junta-104</dc:creator><description>Number one is more acceptable ,, Because of the &amp;quot; Present Perfect Progressive &amp;quot; is used at your expression ( Has Been dancing ) !! So, the preposition ( For ) is required !!  I hope you get it ..</description></item><item><title>Re: I have lived for about a decade in France.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ILivedAboutDecadeFrance/wvjzl/post.htm#690533</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:22:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:690533</guid><dc:creator>alpheccastars</dc:creator><description>The &amp;quot;for&amp;quot; is optional - you can use both.  Simple past tense is fine. Present perfect is not OK, because your sentence implies that you are no longer living in France. Present perfect is used to mean continuation up to the present.  Past perfect would be correct if you stated a time reference for when the action (living in France) ended. &amp;quot;Later&amp;quot; to me is not specific enough, so it sounds a bit strange.  I had lived in France on and off for about a decade before I moved to the US. I had been living in France about a decade before I moved to the US. (past perfect progressive sounds the best to my American ears.)</description></item><item><title>Re:  The verb 'To Wish'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TheVerbToWish/wdqhd/post.htm#687848</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:19:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:687848</guid><dc:creator>alpheccastars</dc:creator><description>Hi Fandorin: The subjunctive is slowing working its way out of our language, but we still use it. &amp;quot;i wish I went&amp;quot; just grates on my ears!  In the subjunctive mood, a present wish about an event in the past (obviously, you cannot change what happened) is the past perfect - an action both started and completed in the past.  I wish that my child had studied harder in school.  Sometimes we use regret + present perfect progressive, but this is the gerund form, not the subjunctive mood.  I regret not having studied harder in school.</description></item><item><title>Re: Teaching the inceptive aspect to Ss whose L1 is Japanese, Korean, Arabic, etc.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TeachingInceptiveAspectWhoseJapanese-KoreanArabic/gngzn/post.htm#681299</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:40:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:681299</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>This is interesting, I wonder if there is a list of words that contain &amp;quot;duration&amp;quot; build in the meaning.  this might clear up the present perfect and present perfect progressive distinction.   for example: &amp;quot;I have been working here for 6 months&amp;quot; vs. &amp;quot;I have worked here for six months.&amp;quot; the only difference between the two verb forms is in the meaning of the verb used. if i choose the verb &amp;quot;SIT&amp;quot; instead we see a difference:  &amp;quot;I have been sitting here for 3 hours, and my butt hurts!&amp;quot; vs. * &amp;quot;I have sit here for 3 hours!&amp;quot;  I&amp;#39;m just curious if there are more words that contain &amp;quot;duration&amp;quot; in their meaning. I&amp;#39;m not sure if i have anything here, I&amp;#39;m still learning...</description></item><item><title>Re: Present perfect progressive tense/ passive voice</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PresentPerfectProgressiveTense-PassiveVoice/dnhjn/post.htm#679875</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:27:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:679875</guid><dc:creator>cool breeze</dc:creator><description>Could any advisor please make a sentence for me using the present perfect progressive tense with a passive vioce? 
 I remember reading in many traditional grammar books that it is incorrect to use these tenses in the passive voice. As they don&amp;#39;t seem to bother native speakers&amp;#39; ears, times may be changing! I avoid them, though. 
 CB</description></item><item><title>Re: How many tenses are there in English language?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HowTensesEnglishLanguage/5/vcwgk/Post.htm#679449</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:05:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:679449</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>Perfect progressive aspect is normally not expressed in the passive voice. Well, you would know what is normal in English, I suppose! FYI. Actual utterance of a native speaker:  The economy is getting worse and worse. More and more employees have been being laid off every month.  I would say that the passive perfect progressive is less commonly used than some of the other tenses, not that it&amp;#39;s not normal. There is probably a frequency count available for all the tenses, and we could say of almost any tense that it is more likely or less likely to be used than any other given tense we might choose. The fact that there are differences in frequency of use really doesn&amp;#39;t make the passive perfect progressive any less a tense than the...</description></item><item><title>Re: has been open or has been opend</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasBeenOpenOrHasBeenOpend/2/ggrhl/Post.htm#670675</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:44:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:670675</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hey everyone, 
 This is an interesting argument we got going on in here. 
 I actually believe the proper sentence should be: &amp;quot;The store has been opened since 1995.&amp;quot; Which implies &amp;quot;the store has been opened by someone since 1995.&amp;quot; 
 The tense here is the passive Present Perfect. It&amp;#39;s in passive AND it is present perfect . Which means it was opened (by someone) then, and it is still open today, and will probably continue to be opened in the future. All passive present perfect tense sentences contain: has/have + been + past participle of the verb. (which is different from the perfect progressive which would be has/have + been + gerund -aka V+ing). 
 Also, notice that &amp;quot;open&amp;quot; can&amp;#39;t be an adjective....</description></item><item><title>Re: Present perfect continuous at negative form</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PresentPerfectContinuousNegative-Form/hqcdv/post.htm#663990</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:29:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:663990</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>There isn&amp;#39;t a right way to say it. Both are correct. 1. I haven&amp;#39;t driven my car for a month.       (present perfect) 2. I haven&amp;#39;t been driving my car for a month.  (present perfect progressive) I think that most people, in this case, would use the first. CJ</description></item><item><title>Re: Please help with Present Perfect Progressive</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PleasePresentPerfectProgressive/hphwx/post.htm#660571</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:16:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:660571</guid><dc:creator>yankee</dc:creator><description>Hi Billyxu 1. I have not been visiting China since 1997. Without additional context, it is difficult to say exactly what is intended in that sentence. You are right to think that there are different possible ways to interpret it. It really is not a good example to use to try to understand the present perfect progressive -- especially without any context. 1. One possible interpretation suggests a reference to a series of repeated, regular visits before 1997 (and after 1997 there were no more visits). In other words, the negation could refer to the fact that prior to 1997, there had been a series of visits. and after 1997 there were no more regular visits. 2. The other way would refer to either one continuous 12-year visit or repeated...</description></item><item><title>Please help with Present Perfect Progressive</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PleasePresentPerfectProgressive/hphwx/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:49:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:660515</guid><dc:creator>billyxu</dc:creator><description>Hi, everyone: These days, I am working on a negative sentences of Present Perfect Progressive tense which is too difficult for me. I come here to seek for your helps. Here is the confusing sentence: 1. I have not been visiting China since 1997. What&amp;#39;s the exact meaning of this sentence? Does it mean: 2. Since 1997, I have not visited China. or 3. Since 1997, I have visited China sometime, say only for a day or two, but I have not stayed there all the time since 1997. If 1 means 2, then why does 1 use a present perfect progressive? Thx</description></item><item><title>Re: What is the difference?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhatIsTheDifference/hxddd/post.htm#655538</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:33:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:655538</guid><dc:creator>raryvey</dc:creator><description>First sample:  1. I am working on it. (present progressive tense) It implies that the activity which is the work is in progress. 2. I have been working on it. (present perfect progressive tense) It implies that the work began in the past, has continued in the present, and may continue in the future. Usually it&amp;#39;s used with adverb of duration like &amp;quot; for two hours .&amp;quot; It emphasizes that the work is already started at some point of time and it has effect or meaning than just &amp;quot; I am working on it &amp;quot; on first sentence. Second sample: 1. I am married since 2001. 2. I have been married since 2001. For sure I don&amp;#39;t know whether the first sentence is grammatically correct or wrong, but if we want to express a duration of...</description></item><item><title>Re: Past and Present times</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PastAndPresentTimes/hmpdm/post.htm#648066</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:30:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:648066</guid><dc:creator>ant_222</dc:creator><description>Hello, pm039. Both tenses your examples are possible in appropriate in an context, though the examples with the Present Perfect need a little correction: &amp;quot;The engine in _the_ car (if you mean a certain car) has not been working. Now it works properly.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The web page has not been appearing in the web browser. Now it is displayed correctly.&amp;quot; (I used the &amp;quot;display&amp;quot; in order not to repeat &amp;quot;appear&amp;quot;) If you want to say that the engine has not been working for a certain period of time until now or until recently, then the Present Perfect Progressive should be your choice. To make your examples clearer, I will add an indication of time: &amp;quot;The engine in the car has not worked since last week, when the...</description></item><item><title>Re: Please can someone check my answers on the following and correct me if they are wrong</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PleaseSomeoneCheckAnswersFollowing-CorrectWrong/hkgmq/post.htm#635899</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 10:59:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:635899</guid><dc:creator>avangi</dc:creator><description>A.   Underline the verb or verbs and identify the tense/s. (  9 pts  )   Tina was sleeping when I entered the room. _ past tense __  past continuous OR past tense of was plus past participle (as adj.) /  entered  past tense    Jose watches television every night. __ present tense ________ okay    The man had been studying English for two hours when his friend arrived.__ past tense   ( had been studying) past perfect progressive tense /  arrived past tense    I will tell you today. Future tense _______________ okay    She had lived in</description></item><item><title>Re: Verbs versus verbals</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/VerbsVersusVerbals/hgprq/post.htm#619037</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:14:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:619037</guid><dc:creator>avangi</dc:creator><description>Hi, Eddie, I struggled with the same question. I guess anybody can make up a term. Some stick; some don&amp;#39;t. CJ seems to talk about the function of a word vs. its identity, or something like that. I think it&amp;#39;s all a matter of definition, and who&amp;#39;s got the clout. The only thing I&amp;#39;m sure of is the infinitive and the present and past participles. This is what they  are  , not what they  do  . It bugs the hell out of me that when the past participle functions as an adjective, it&amp;#39;s still a participle, but when the present participle functions as a noun, it&amp;#39;s no longer a participle. As to your specific question, I&amp;#39;ve settled for the time being on the notion that when the so-called &amp;quot;principal parts of the...</description></item><item><title>Re: Have been</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HaveBeen/hgqlm/post.htm#618950</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:42:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:618950</guid><dc:creator>avangi</dc:creator><description>The second is ungrammatical. You need to use the &amp;quot;other&amp;quot; participle, &amp;quot;I have reviewed the incident.&amp;quot; ( Have been reviewing  is present perfect progressive tense;  Have reviewed  is present perfect tense.) In the first case, the action is continuing; in the second case, the action has been (recently) completed. ( Reviewing  is called the present participle of the verb  to review  .  Reviewed  is called the past participle .)</description></item><item><title>Re: Participle in past perfect progressive or adjective in past perfect</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ParticiplePastPerfectProgressive-AdjectivePastPerfect/hcdkh/post.htm#595839</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:13:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:595839</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>The problem of disambiguating a participle that is part of a verb phrase from a participle that is an adjective is not related at all to the past perfect tense. Any time you have the verb to be in any tense, the same problem can occur. You seem to be focusing on present participles.  As a general rule -- but it is not 100% accurate -- an animate subject will lead you to think of the -ing word as part of a verb phrase. (That&amp;#39;s the case with both of your examples.)  An inanimate subject is often a signal that the -ing word is an adjective. The present participle in the latter case is often from a verb of psychological state -- a word that expresses a human reaction to a situation.  Examples of present participles as adjectives:...</description></item><item><title>Re: Participle in past perfect progressive or adjective in past perfect</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ParticiplePastPerfectProgressive-AdjectivePastPerfect/hcdkh/post.htm#595693</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:33:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:595693</guid><dc:creator>clive</dc:creator><description>Hi,  How could we tell if a participle in what looks like a past perfect progressive tense is a participle part of the tense or an adjective of a past perfect tense construction? The cook had been making cake all day until he was called by the head chef to do other tasks. -- looks to be a good past past perfect progressive tense. The student had been finishing up on his composition when a knock on the door put a stop to it. -- looks to be an adjectival phrase with past perfect before it.  #2 doesn&amp;#39;t look adjectival to me. It looks the same as #1.  How would you assess this version?  The cook had been making cake all day when a knock on the door put a stop to it.   Best wishes, Clive</description></item><item><title>Participle in past perfect progressive or adjective in past perfect</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ParticiplePastPerfectProgressive-AdjectivePastPerfect/hcdkh/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:58:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:595517</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hi, How could we tell if a participle in what looks like a past perfect progressive tense is a participle part of the tense or an adjective of a past perfect tense construction? The cook had been making cake all day until he was called by the head chef to do other tasks. -- looks to be a good past past perfect progressive tense. The student had been finishing up on his composition when a knock on the door put a stop to it. -- looks to be an adjectival phrase with past perfect before it.</description></item><item><title>Re: haven't skoked vs haven't been smoking</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HaventSkokedHaventSmoking/hbdwp/post.htm#590585</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:12:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:590585</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>Situation 1: A: Have a cigarette please? B:Thanks.I haven&amp;#39;t smoked (Here. I mean I am a non-smoker.) This is very unidiomatic. You will have to change it considerably.  I haven&amp;#39;t smoked will never get across the idea that you don&amp;#39;t smoke.  A: Would you like a cigarette?  / Cigarette?  B: No, thanks. I don&amp;#39;t smoke.  Situation 2: A: Have a cigarette please? B:Thanks.I haven&amp;#39;t been smoking Again, you need a lot of changes to get your idea across.  A: Would you like a cigarette?  /  Cigarette?  B. No, thanks. I gave it up. / No, thanks. I gave up smoking .  ______ You seem to have some misunderstandings about the present perfect and the present perfect progressive tenses. It will take a while to understand them well. Be...</description></item><item><title>Re: Asking for an answer again - passivity and intransivity?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AskingAnswerAgainPassivity-Intransivity/hrbgd/post.htm#586296</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:41:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:586296</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>Let the curly brackets { } mean &amp;quot;a form of&amp;quot;.  Thus, {be} means &amp;quot;a form of be&amp;quot;; that is, {be} means any of be, being, been, is, are, am, was, were.  -ing represents the present participle form of a verb, e.g., being, having, walking, taking, seeing, hiding, ...  -en represents the past participle form of a verb, e.g., been, had, walked, taken, seen, hidden, ...   {be} + -ing creates progressive tenses (also called continuous tenses). Intransitive verbs may occur in this form.  {be} + -en creates passive tenses. Intransitive verbs may not occur in this form. _____  are vanish ing  is {be} + -ing , so it is a progressive tense, not a passive. It is completely grammatical as is.  are vanish ed  is {be} + -en , so it is a...</description></item><item><title>Re: Being or been</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BeingOrBeen/2/gqwkv/Post.htm#582325</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:28:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:582325</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>can Can you tell me the difference between the following two sentences ?  1. Being so late 2. Been so late They aren&amp;#39;t sentences, as mentioned above.  Some ways to use being  1. Put a form of be in front of it ( am being, is being, are being, was being, were being ). Add an adjective or noun. This indicates &amp;quot;behaving&amp;quot; a certain way or &amp;quot;acting like&amp;quot; a certain kind of person.  The children are being good today, for a change!  (The children are behaving well. They are not getting into trouble!)  Henry was being a jerk, and Lucy was very annoyed about it.  (Henry was acting like a jerk. He was behaving badly.)  2. Put a form of be in front of it and a past participle after it. This forms the passive progressive. It...</description></item><item><title>Present Perfect VS Present Perfect Progressive</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PresentPerfectPresentPerfect-Progressive/gpmxd/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:59:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:578530</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Present Perfect VS Present Perfect Progressive  I have lived here for 10 years. I have been living here for 10 years.  Can anyone tell me the difference between Present Perfect and Present Perfect Progressive? And give me some example?</description></item><item><title>Durational aspect of progressive tenses</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DurationalAspectProgressive-Tenses/gpgxg/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:05:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:576799</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hi, I was told that a present or past progressive tense like &amp;quot;is sleeping&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;was sleeping&amp;quot; denotes a temporary action or activity and the present perfect or past perfect progressive is used to indicate duration.  I don&amp;#39;t understand why a present progressive is one that denotes a temporary action and I don&amp;#39;t particularily see clearly why a present perfect tense is the one that emphasizes (denotes strongly?) the element duration and a present progressive tense is not, if I interpreted what was told correctly. Both of the two pairs in mixed tenses below seem to denote duration , not temporary actions per se. eg, John was sleeping when I walked in. John had been sleeping when I walked in. John is sleeping now....</description></item><item><title>Re: "I've been knowing him for years"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IveBeenKnowingHimForYears/5/cdvhq/Post.htm#573749</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:29:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:573749</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Goodman:   I didn’t not change the content of your post  No, you did. You said that I had said &amp;quot;I stopped know it&amp;quot;. I&amp;#39;ve never written so. I wrote &amp;quot;I stopped know ing it&amp;quot;.     If  you say “I forgot I have a     10 o’clock   meeting” Can you equate this to “I don’t know I have a meeting at   10 o’clock   ? No!     You are right, I can&amp;#39;t equate this. But I surely can equate &amp;quot;I forgot the password&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;I don&amp;#39;t know the password&amp;quot;. I can agree with you that &amp;quot;to know&amp;quot; IS NOT ALWAYS durative. But you should agree that IT CAN BE durative, hence yo should permit using it with Perfect Progressive in particular cases.  Again, the problem arose when someone spread the impossibility to use...</description></item><item><title>Re: "I've been knowing him for years"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IveBeenKnowingHimForYears/5/cdvhq/Post.htm#573702</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 06:55:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:573702</guid><dc:creator>goodman</dc:creator><description>Anon,   I didn’t change anything in your previous post in my response to your persistence on the perfect progressive  usage of “knowing”. Your accusation had no basis. This awkward usage was what started all the fuzz on Google search discrepancy, and disputes. The oppsoing view with this usage was not solely mine. You are upset because you couldn’t convince the forum to accept what you believed in your mind was the correct use of  “I have been knowing him for years”.  To be truthful, personally I couldn’t care less if you still insist on using it that way and being adamant about its “durative property” because my intent to respond to your post was not to make pointless argument which seemed to be the direction it was going. You&amp;#39;ve...</description></item><item><title>Re: "I've been knowing him for years"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IveBeenKnowingHimForYears/3/cdvhq/Post.htm#572148</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:12:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:572148</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Google gives 213 instances of &amp;quot;I&amp;#39;ve been knowing it&amp;quot;. Not much, but it counts. A search string like &amp;quot;been knowing&amp;quot; gives 71000 instances, which is absolutely considerable. People keep treating the verb &amp;quot;to know&amp;quot; as a normally and logically durative verb, which it actually is, despite the prohibition to use it with Past Perfect Progressive (Continuous) Tense. Why do they use a way trickier form, when a much shorter form (&amp;quot;I have known&amp;quot;) is taught in shools? All so called &amp;quot;stative&amp;quot; verbs are durative (&amp;quot;I started to know it two years ago, and the duration of this my knowledge is valid until today&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;I knew it for two years, then I forgot it, i.e. I stopped knowing it. I...</description></item><item><title>Re: past progressive or past perfect progressive</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PastProgressivePastPerfect-Progressive/gxgqk/post.htm#572047</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 01:31:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:572047</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hi, The original poster, beta_teacher, wrote:   in the following sentence : Bob and I went for a walk . I had ttrouble  keeping up   with him because __ ( walk ) so  fast . which tense shoul be used? Past  progressive or  Past Perfect  Progressive   I have the similar problem in that I think a past perfect progressive tense is a good option.  I had trouble keeping up with him (at that time) because he had been walking so fast (before that time).  Sure, what are in parentheses were not in the original question sentence but I think we can force ourselves to accept that they are there if one really wants to push his argument further to his direction.  Why did you say (if I read your remark correctly) this is odd to even consider for that...</description></item></channel></rss>