<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Plural subject tag:Adverbs' matching tags 'Plural subject' and 'Adverbs'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aPlural+subject+tag%3aAdverbs&amp;tag=Plural+subject,Adverbs&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Plural subject tag:Adverbs' matching tags 'Plural subject' and 'Adverbs'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3191.21962)</generator><item><title>Re: I need your help,please.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/INeedYourHelpPlease/zgmdc/post.htm#450604</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 07:36:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:450604</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; "women"&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; use plural to match "the elderly"&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; "are more LIKELY"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; The goals of our program ARE&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; use plural verb with plural subject&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3.&amp;nbsp; MANY benefits&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; "Much" is for stuff; "many" is for things you can count.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4.&amp;nbsp; there IS a lot of space&amp;nbsp; (missing verb in clause)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; IN which he could write&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (or) &amp;nbsp; WHERE he could write&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;5.&amp;nbsp; (wrong choice of conjunctions)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; use "but" instead of "or"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;6.&amp;nbsp; in ALMOST every country&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;7.&amp;nbsp; is EXTREMELY important&amp;nbsp; (use adverb form to modify predicate adjective)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;8.&amp;nbsp; positive OR negative&amp;nbsp; (conjunction)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;9.&amp;nbsp; While I WAS TAKING a walk&amp;nbsp; (past tense to match "saw")&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; RAKING&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (wrong words&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; "talking" for&amp;nbsp; "taking"&amp;nbsp; and&amp;nbsp; "ranking" for&amp;nbsp;"raking")&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;10.&amp;nbsp; to care FOR their parents&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;11.&amp;nbsp; five LAPTOP TESTS&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ("tests" is a noun&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; object of the preposition&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; and is plural because there are five.&amp;nbsp; "Laptop" is an adjective in this case and doesn't have to agree.&amp;nbsp; It could be a noun if used alone, like "Five laptops were found to be defective.")&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;12.&amp;nbsp; INSECTS&amp;nbsp; (plural to agree with animals)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I think "fossilized" is the better adjective&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I'd suggest using two separate sentences: "insects.&amp;nbsp; Fossilized"&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; a period at the end&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;13.&amp;nbsp; I think this is okay.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; It needs a period at the end.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Congratulations on your first post!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: was/were; bad/badly; due to/because of</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BadlyBecause/cgxbq/post.htm#200599</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:34:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:200599</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;DIV class=ult-indent&gt;
&lt;DIV class=ult-header&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size=5&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Niether / or question and usage &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size=5&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;Searching findings: &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If two singular subjects are connected by &lt;EM&gt;neither . . . nor &lt;/EM&gt;or &lt;EM&gt;either . . . or&lt;/EM&gt;, the verb must be singular as well.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;â¢&amp;nbsp;Neither Spiderman nor Batman is going to the party.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;â¢&amp;nbsp;Either Slim or Roger has to leave town before someone gets hurt.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If one singular subject and one plural subject are connected by &lt;EM&gt;neither .&amp;nbsp;. . nor &lt;/EM&gt;or &lt;EM&gt;either . . . or&lt;/EM&gt;, match the verb with whichever subject itâs closer to.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;â¢&amp;nbsp;Neither Olivia nor the boys eat mushrooms.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;â¢&amp;nbsp;Neither the boys nor Olivia eat&lt;B&gt;s&lt;/B&gt; mushrooms.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;â¢&amp;nbsp;Either one rat or several mice are eating everything in the cupboard.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;â¢&amp;nbsp;Either several mice or one rat is eating everything in the cupboard.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On another search, it said:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;He will not permit the change or&lt;/I&gt; (or &lt;I&gt;nor&lt;/I&gt;) &lt;I&gt;even consider it.&lt;/I&gt; In noun phrases of the type &lt;I&gt;no this or that, or&lt;/I&gt; is actually more common than &lt;I&gt;nor: He has no experience or interest&lt;/I&gt; (less frequently &lt;I&gt;nor interest&lt;/I&gt;) &lt;I&gt;in chemistry. Or&lt;/I&gt; is also more common than &lt;I&gt;nor&lt;/I&gt; when such a noun phrase, adjective phrase, or adverb phrase is introduced by &lt;I&gt;not: He is not a philosopher or a statesman. They were not rich or happy.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;clause), you can use either &lt;I&gt;or&lt;/I&gt; or &lt;I&gt;nor: He will not permit the change or&lt;/I&gt; (or &lt;I&gt;nor&lt;/I&gt;) &lt;I&gt;even consider it.&lt;/I&gt; In noun phrases of the type &lt;I&gt;no this or that, or&lt;/I&gt; is actually more common than &lt;I&gt;nor: He has no experience or interest&lt;/I&gt; (less frequently &lt;I&gt;nor interest&lt;/I&gt;) &lt;I&gt;in chemistry. Or&lt;/I&gt; is also more common than &lt;I&gt;nor&lt;/I&gt; when such a noun phrase, adjective phrase, or adverb phrase is introduced by &lt;I&gt;not: He is not a philosopher or a statesman. They were not rich or happy.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think I know why we have varying opinions here. When I made my posting, I had &lt;B&gt;neither&lt;/B&gt; and &lt;B&gt;either &lt;/B&gt;in mind&lt;B&gt; &lt;/B&gt;as singular form because that was the original posted question.&lt;B&gt; &lt;/B&gt;So all the references I made was based on that premise. After doing some searching, I think we are all correct. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now, let me give it another twist. If I were to say:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;âNeither I nor my friends are going to the partyâ- This is correct; isnât it?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now if I reword it to âNeither my friends nor I [was/ am /are] going to the partyâ which one is correct? since "I" is the noun closea to the verb?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I promise, I will leave it at that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Across the road there is (are?) a store and a fire hall</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AcrossRoadStoreFireHall/2/bbxcn/Post.htm#92527</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:29:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:92527</guid><dc:creator>Kenny Dorham</dc:creator><description>Hi, Abbie, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It may be unlikely that you, or anyone else for that matter, would have an occasion to use such a sentence, but let's look at it carefully anyway. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There is John, whom I haven't seen in years, and Fred, my once-best friend, sitting on a park bench.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If we remove the non-restrictive (not necessary for identification) adjective clause "whom I haven't seen in years" and the non-restrictive appositive "my once-best friend," what we have left is "There is John and Fred, sitting on a park bench."  Without the adjective clause and the appositive it is fairly clear that most people would say "There are John and Fred, sitting on a park bench" (plural subject, plural verb).  My point was that when using the expletive "there," if you begin to add elements (clauses or phrases) between your first subject (in this case "John") and your second subject ("in this case "Fred"), the plural verb begins to sound rather peculiar.  &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I kind of like your idea of an understood explective and subject, but this happens, unless I am mistaken, exclusively in adverb clauses ("Although tired, he fought on,"  "he was" being understood.)</description></item></channel></rss>