<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Plural subject tag:Dates' matching tags 'Plural subject' and 'Dates'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aPlural+subject+tag%3aDates</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Plural subject tag:Dates' matching tags 'Plural subject' and 'Dates'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3248.36859)</generator><item><title>Re: There is/are</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ThereIsAre/2/ccjhp/Post.htm#179603</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 07:49:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:179603</guid><dc:creator>rvw</dc:creator><description>Grammar demands a plural verb with a plural subject.&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;  &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;Are&lt;/font&gt; should be used in all of Selvakumar's and Katarina's examples.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But &lt;i&gt;Webster's Dictionary of English Usage &lt;/i&gt; points out that there is a "...long-standing propensity for &lt;i&gt;there is&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;there's&lt;/i&gt;
in every case, even when the following subject is clearly plural and
there are no complications to cloud our minds. Jespersen finds the same
construction in Danish, Russian, and Italian, and dates it back in
English to the 15th century."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Common or not, &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;there is&lt;/font&gt; with a plural subject is "...generally avoided in the literary style."</description></item></channel></rss>