<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Plural subject tag:Pronunciation' matching tags 'Plural subject' and 'Pronunciation'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aPlural+subject+tag%3aPronunciation</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Plural subject tag:Pronunciation' matching tags 'Plural subject' and 'Pronunciation'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3248.36859)</generator><item><title>Re: &amp;amp;quot;There/Here is&amp;amp;quot; with plural subject allowed?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PluralSubjectAllowed/ndhd/post.htm#64858</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:32:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:64858</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><description>Hi Ralf,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You are both correct.  They are still considered ungrammatical by many, and you would be wise to avoid them in careful writing; but the fact remains that the use of 'here/there is' (usually as 'here's/there's') with plural nouns is extremely common-- and acceptable-- informally.  I use them myself frequently when I speak.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My feeling is that the reason is primarily one of pronunciation:  'there/here are' is difficult to clearly enunciate-- /h:r?r/ etc.  We do not have the same anomaly in the case of 'this is / these are', which always agree with the number of their nouns.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>