<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Possessives tag:Contractions' matching tags 'Possessives' and 'Contractions'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aPossessives+tag%3aContractions&amp;tag=Possessives,Contractions&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Possessives tag:Contractions' matching tags 'Possessives' and 'Contractions'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3191.21962)</generator><item><title>Re: the teacher's developing cognizance of the child's intellectual activity</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TeachersDevelopingCognizanceChilds-IntellectualActivity/glwjh/post.htm#557641</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:38:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:557641</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><description>I&amp;#39;m suffering from lack of the first part of the sentence.&amp;nbsp; On first blush, one might take &amp;quot;teacher&amp;#39;s&amp;quot; as a contraction instead of a possessive.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Intellectual activity&amp;quot; means different things to different people.&amp;nbsp; In a classroom of young children, it would probably mean &amp;quot;the child&amp;#39;s learning processes,&amp;quot; which could include the learning of social skills as well as the three R&amp;#39;s.&amp;nbsp; To a Special Ed teacher, working one-on-one,&amp;nbsp; it could be cognitive processing.&amp;nbsp; (Note that it&amp;#39;s the teacher who&amp;#39;s developing here, not the child.)&amp;nbsp; To a college professor it might be intellectual acuity, or analytical insight.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp; - A.</description></item><item><title>Re: Mission control...</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/MissionControl/gjvkg/post.htm#546675</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:33:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:546675</guid><dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator><description>I assume that &lt;strong&gt;plant&amp;#39;s&lt;/strong&gt; is a contraction of &lt;strong&gt;plant is&lt;/strong&gt; rather than the possessive.&amp;nbsp; So, it means that the mission [goal of the task] is centered at the plant.&amp;nbsp; NASA&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;mission control&amp;quot; is somewhere in Texas, I believe.</description></item><item><title>Re: You and Who's</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/YouAndWhos/ghqcb/post.htm#540176</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:19:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:540176</guid><dc:creator>RayH</dc:creator><description>Why donât you have a medical check up &lt;strike&gt;[checked up?]&lt;/strike&gt; with this doctor?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Why don&amp;#39;t &lt;strong&gt;you&lt;/strong&gt; visit to this doctor and have &lt;strong&gt;you&lt;/strong&gt; checked up?&lt;strong&gt; This is wrong. If you want to use a similar sentence try, &amp;quot;Why don&amp;#39;t you visit this doctor and have yourself checked out?&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;While also I got confused in WHO&amp;#39;S AND WHOSE&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. I entered the beauty center with my mom [&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strike&gt;who&amp;#39;s or&lt;/strike&gt; whose&lt;/strong&gt;?] regular appointment was set on that day to meet the beautician.&lt;strong&gt;Whose is possessive; who&amp;#39;s is the contraction of &amp;quot;who is&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Help with apostrophe's</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HelpWithApostrophes/gcpjd/post.htm#515443</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 06:27:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:515443</guid><dc:creator>nona the brit</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Rule One: Don&amp;#39;t &lt;u&gt;ever&lt;/u&gt; use apostrophes when you are making a plural. Apostrophe&amp;#39;s in your title is incorrect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rule Two: Use apostrophes when you are making a possessive. Sometimes it goes before the s and sometimes after the s. You need to learn the rule and if you search this site you&amp;#39;ll find plenty of help.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rule Three: Use apostophes in contractions, such as in the word &amp;#39;you&amp;#39;ll&amp;#39; in my sentence above. You put the apostrophe in the place of the missing letters.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Pizza's?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Pizzas/gbphq/post.htm#510509</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:59:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:510509</guid><dc:creator>GrammarGuy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Pizzas&amp;quot; is the plural: &amp;quot;We sell pizzas.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Pizza&amp;#39;s&amp;quot; is a possessive:&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;The pizza&amp;#39;s topping was delicious.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Pizza&amp;#39;s&amp;quot; is also a&amp;nbsp;contraction: &amp;quot;Pizza&amp;#39;s my favorite food.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Plurals of abbreviations - 1990's or 1990s</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PluralsAbbreviations1990s1990s/2/gbjzh/Post.htm#508732</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:33:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:508732</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>I think the p&amp;#39;s and q&amp;#39;s argument is most salient here.&amp;nbsp; The apostrophe is used for the sake of clarity.&amp;nbsp; While conventionally used for the possessive, the apostrophe is also used to indicate vernacular omissions and contractions, such as in the cases of &amp;quot;Ol&amp;#39; Dirty ***&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;N&amp;#39;awlins.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; This understadning of the usage of apostrophes is important for thinking about the 1990s/1990&amp;#39;s problem.&amp;nbsp; If you were to spell out the actual words 1990 and 1990s/1990&amp;#39;s,&amp;nbsp; you get the words &amp;quot;nineteen ninety&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;nineteen nineties.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; The difference between these two words is a &amp;quot;y&amp;quot; and an &amp;quot;ies.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The possessive spelling of 1990&amp;#39;s would be &amp;quot;nineteen ninety&amp;#39;s,&amp;quot; the plural, &amp;quot;nineteen nineties.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp; The abbreviated representation of the possessive should clearly be 1990&amp;#39;s, but what about the plural?&amp;nbsp; One could argue that the apostrophe in this case stands for the omission of the &amp;quot;ie&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;nineteen nineties&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;  &lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Please Check My Answers</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PleaseCheckMyAnswers/zxkbp/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:08:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:489309</guid><dc:creator>Blondie024</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;1. The possessive of a plural noun ending in &lt;strong&gt;s&lt;/strong&gt; is formed by adding:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A. another s and an apostrophe. B. another s only. C. an apostrophe only. D. none of the above&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think the answer is C.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. Which of the following shows the correct possessive form of a plural noun?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A. three dogs bowls B. three dog&amp;#39;s bowls C. three dogs&amp;#39; bowls D. none of the above&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think the answer is C.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. In a contraction, the apostrophe replaces:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A. missing letters. B. using an s. C. a unit of measurement. D. none of the above.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think the answer is A.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. Which of the following is a correct contraction of &amp;quot;they would&amp;quot;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A. they&amp;#39;ld B. they&amp;#39;d C. they&amp;#39;wld D. none of the above&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think the answer is D.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. Which of the following shows the correct possessive form of &amp;quot;children&amp;quot;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A. childrens B. childrens&amp;#39; C. childrens&amp;#39;s D. children&amp;#39;s&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think the answer is A.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. A preposition connects a (n):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A. subject and verb. B. object and modifiers. C. subject and predicate. D. adjective and adverb.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Question about apostrophe usage with possesive pronouns</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/QuestionAboutApostropheUsage-PossesivePronouns/znhmk/post.htm#483711</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 16:28:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:483711</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;the answer is that you can&amp;#39;t. Can you think of an example where you might?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The only time you would write an apostrophe with a possessive pronoun would be to indicate the contraction &lt;em&gt;&amp;#39;s &lt;/em&gt;for &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt;:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;That&amp;#39;s not my jacket.&amp;nbsp; &lt;font color="#800"&gt;Mine&amp;#39;s &lt;/font&gt;over there.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;JJM&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: their?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Their/zjdqr/post.htm#462961</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:39:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:462961</guid><dc:creator>Vorpar</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;"Their" is used as a possessive for "the user" (to avoid gender pronouns like his or hers).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"they've": they is a pronoun for "the user" and is a contraction of "they have".&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Can I contract &amp;quot;David is doing...&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;David's doing...&amp;quot;</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ContractDavidDoingDavidsDoing/vnhpd/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 06:58:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:400234</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hello, all&lt;br&gt;Question:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"David is doing his home work."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it possible to use a contraction with &lt;i&gt;David &lt;/i&gt;and &lt;i&gt;is &lt;/i&gt;to make "David's doing his homework." I think in this case the contraction is either ungrammatical or at best unwise because &lt;i&gt;David's &lt;/i&gt;is possessive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Am I right or wrong? Would you get involved in teaching this kind of contraction or would you just stick to the contractions of, say, he is or she is?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hope you can help&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ML&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;CELTA trainee&lt;br&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>