<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Predicates' matching tag 'Predicates'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aPredicates</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Predicates' matching tag 'Predicates'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>XMOD (Build: 3614.32638)</generator><item><title>Re: Grammar</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Grammar/2/lxxmm/Post.htm#994192</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:39:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:994192</guid><dc:creator>gleb_chebrikoff</dc:creator><description>Hello, Amy,   rejecting any of the sentences and condemning them as absolutely incorrect would be a serious flaw in linguistic thinking, but we may still make use of these categories (correct/incorrect) when explaining neat areas of grammar to our students - for the sake of teaching expediency.  Enclosing into brackets this element or that is important in that it shows what potential conjoins are to be dealt with - in my book, we deal with predicates, but, according to your understanding, the predications are in question. If the latter approach is adopted, we indeed recognise the possibility of ellipsis. However, the stumbling stone in our case is the issue of negation . There is a negated verb in the second clause - I couldn&amp;#39;t agree...</description></item><item><title>Re: Predicate Nominative?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PredicateNominative/lxpnq/post.htm#992155</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:16:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:992155</guid><dc:creator>mrpedantic</dc:creator><description>Hello Anon, 
  
 "Are" is indeed the linking verb; but I would call "the consent form, sign-in sheet, list of locations and my card" the subject. "Attached are" is thus an inverted predicate; and "attached" itself I would call an adjectival subject complement. 
  
 It wouldn't surprise me if there were other interpretations, though. 
  
 Best wishes, 
  
 MrP</description></item><item><title>Re: Comma Sutra</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CommaSutra/lkqpz/post.htm#972750</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:08:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:972750</guid><dc:creator>philip</dc:creator><description>The more Angry Face tried not to think about the deer , the more he thought about it and the more frustrated he became. 
  
  
 Can I write this sentence without any commas? 
  
 Must I put a comma after &amp;quot;it&amp;quot;? I think that &amp;quot;the more he thought&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the more frustrated he became&amp;quot; make a compound predicate, thus they should not be separated by a comma. 
  
 What say you? 
 
  It&amp;#39;s probably more a question of style than of rule. I prefer your idea. 
 And I love the title to your querie!</description></item><item><title>Comma Sutra</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CommaSutra/lkqpz/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:06:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:972745</guid><dc:creator>ducks1160</dc:creator><description>The more Angry Face tried not to think about the deer , the more he thought about it and the more frustrated he became.   Can I write this sentence without any commas?   Must I put a comma after &amp;quot;it&amp;quot;? I think that &amp;quot;the more he thought&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the more frustrated he became&amp;quot; make a compound predicate, thus they should not be separated by a comma.   What say you?</description></item><item><title>Re: Two questions about tense</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TwoQuestionsAboutTense/lklwj/post.htm#971277</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:56:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:971277</guid><dc:creator>yankee</dc:creator><description>Hi Sitifan   For 1, I would only choose &amp;quot;was&amp;quot;. (was stolen = passive = reference to a past act)   For 2, I would use &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;. We frequently use &amp;quot;broken&amp;quot; as a predicate adjective, and in this case &amp;quot;is broken&amp;quot; refers to a current state.   Basically, we don&amp;#39;t use &amp;quot;stolen&amp;quot; as a predicate adjective.</description></item><item><title>Re: HELP!!! independent clauses connected with ,and</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HelpIndependentClausesConnected-And/2/lkdpm/Post.htm#969990</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:33:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:969990</guid><dc:creator>gleb_chebrikoff</dc:creator><description>(...continued)  Henry was tired, hot, and sweaty (poor man!!!) also features one finite verb phrase, in fact - the only one. Tired, hot, and sweaty is a subject complement (or predicative), and there are no grounds for &amp;#39;seeing it through elliptic spectacles&amp;#39;. Paraphrase is still possible, just as you have suggested. Latin dominated English for a period next to eternity, and this state of affairs still hurts. F. de Saussure et al . made matters better, but you can still see the Latin trace in different modern grammars, perhaps less so in the US or Great Britain. When I was referring to Latin, I meant the term predicate that is used outside binary analysis to convey the meaning reserved for verb (as a clause element, not a word...</description></item><item><title>Re: HELP!!! independent clauses connected with ,and</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HelpIndependentClausesConnected-And/2/lkdpm/Post.htm#969921</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:52:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:969921</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>there still exists a tendency to put English in a mould originally intended for Latin I agree, but I don&amp;#39;t see how it applies in this case. It seems to me that the majority of languages (if not all) have sentences that divide into subjects and predicates. So we may just as well say in this case that the concepts of subject and predicate are based on the grammar of French, of Chinese, of Swahili, or of Hawaiian. (Or we might, for once, just drop that tiresome Latin-bashing that is so popular in linguistics these days.  )   CJ</description></item><item><title>Re: HELP!!! independent clauses connected with ,and</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HelpIndependentClausesConnected-And/2/lkdpm/Post.htm#969882</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:07:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:969882</guid><dc:creator>gleb_chebrikoff</dc:creator><description>Thus, in a sentence such as I washed my face and brushed my teeth and went to bed  the predicate is everything except for I , which is a subject (by denying that one automatically accepts the viewpoint that the sentence is a compound one, with subjects omitted). Predicate, in turn, can be subdivided into operators (optional)  and predication . In Pat has joined our club , has is an operator, and joined our club - a predication. The phrase &amp;#39;compound predicate&amp;#39; sounds bizarre, to be honest. Respectfully, Gleb Chebrikoff</description></item><item><title>Re: HELP!!! independent clauses connected with ,and</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HelpIndependentClausesConnected-And/2/lkdpm/Post.htm#969869</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:54:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:969869</guid><dc:creator>gleb_chebrikoff</dc:creator><description>(...continued) ... &amp;#39;They have appeared on message boards.&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;  spread by word of mouth.&amp;#39; Such a phenomenon is technically known as polypredication . Second, punctuation comes in handy, as the comma in such cases usually indicates that clauses are conjoined. However, other factors favour the opposite interpretation. It may be argued that the whole structure is a single clause with two coordinate predications (by predication is meant appeared on message boards and spread by word of mouth ). To support this, a question can be put to the sentence:            Have they  and ?  Besides, after adopting this approach, a close correspondence between the structural aspect of coordination and the semantic aspect which accompanies...</description></item><item><title>Re: HELP!!! independent clauses connected with ,and</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HelpIndependentClausesConnected-And/lkdpm/post.htm#969710</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:36:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:969710</guid><dc:creator>billj</dc:creator><description>I thought have was needed before  spread to keep a single tense. That would be a good solution: 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  They have appeared on message boards and in blogs and have spread by word of mouth.  
   
 There are no dependent clauses here, by the way --- just an independent clause with a compound predicate. 
  
 CJ 
 
  
  
 This is not a question of predicate, compound (whatever that means) or otherwise. 
  
 This is a straightforward example of a compound sentence containing TWO independent clauses, linked by the conjunction &amp;#39; and &amp;#39;&amp;#39; : 
  
   and   .  
  
 You can tell there are two clauses because there are TWO VERBS ( have appeared  and  have spread , or the passive have been spread  ).  A clause...</description></item><item><title>Re: Predicate adjectives</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PredicateAdjectives/lkbwm/post.htm#968561</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:02:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:968561</guid><dc:creator>billj</dc:creator><description>Hi 
  
  The simple answer is yes, but there’s more to it than that. The verb ‘stay’ is a linking verb (aka a copular verb). What it links here is the subject (‘the paint’) with the entire sequence  ’looking good for many years’ , which although functioning as a Complement (i.e. predicate adjective) is, importantly, a nonfinite subordinate clause, not a phrase.  
    
  Some people would analyse it, like you, so that the Complement (i.e. predicative adjective) is just ‘ looking good’ , with the prepositional phrase ‘ for many years’  functioning as a separate (Adverbial) element. But, that analysis does not reflect the feeling we have that ‘ looking good’ and ‘ for  many years’ go together. My analysis keeps these elements together. ...</description></item><item><title>Re: Predicate adjectives</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PredicateAdjectives/lkbwm/post.htm#968445</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:36:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:968445</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>It is predicative, since it is in the predicate of the sentence, i.e. it follows the verb.</description></item><item><title>Predicate adjectives</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PredicateAdjectives/lkbwm/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:11:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:968298</guid><dc:creator>007606259</dc:creator><description>In the sentence &amp;#39;the paint stays looking good for many years&amp;#39;, is the participial phrase &amp;#39;looking good&amp;#39; a predicate adjective, or is it just a regular adjective?</description></item><item><title>Re: English</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/English/ljrzj/post.htm#963628</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:17:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:963628</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>subject,direct object,indirect object,predicate nominative,objcet of a preposition,direct address,appositive,or an abjective complement.
 These terms describe the functions that words take when used in sentences . They are not properties of single words. Your question is therefore incoherent. It cannot be answered.    You are asking something like this:  Is the number 548 greater or less?    CJ</description></item><item><title>Re: Depending on</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DependingOn/2/lwpmh/Post.htm#962933</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:13:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:962933</guid><dc:creator>yankee</dc:creator><description>Hi Avangi  Also depending/ dependent  upon the weather would be the farmers and the construction workers. I think it&amp;#39;s worth mentioning that in your sentence, I don&amp;#39;t see a phrase that means &amp;quot;contingent on&amp;quot;.   In addition, that sentence can be reworded this way: - The farmers and the construction workers would also be depending upon the weather.  The meaning of &amp;quot;depend&amp;quot; is &amp;quot;rely&amp;quot;.   Or do you  think the intended meaning of that sentence is this: - The farmers and the construction workers would also be contingent on the weather.  (Without any context to justify or explain it, that sentence doesn&amp;#39;t make much sense to me.)   The meaning that our original poster&amp;#39;s daughter wanted to convey was...</description></item><item><title>Re: Need help with breaking down a sentence</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/NeedBreakingDownSentence/lwxxw/post.htm#962335</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:25:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:962335</guid><dc:creator>avangi</dc:creator><description>Not really my cup of tea. The semicolon puzzles me greatly. (I suppose it separates the two direct objects.)   I see only one main clause: home has setting and descent .   The only other thing I&amp;#39;d call a clause is &amp;quot;that seems appropriately named.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Re: Cleanliness / run /   passive or active</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CleanlinessPassiveActive/lhppl/post.htm#958346</link><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:29:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:958346</guid><dc:creator>jemaasjr</dc:creator><description>1 The kitchen is the place I like to have the cleanest at all times. Since I moved out and have been living on my own, cleanliness has been a big part of my everyday life , as opposed to when I lived with a roommate and didn&amp;#39;t care how the place looked.  I&amp;#39;m having trouble with the bold bits?  The kitchen is the place (Perfectly good sentence all by itself)   I like to have the cleanest at all times. A little awkward because we do not know what is less clean, but okay I guess.   S ince I moved out and have been living on my own , An opening subordinate clause, okay with the &amp;quot;,&amp;quot;  cleanliness has been a big part of my everyday life , A sentence all by itself. (If has been is a linking verb (I think it is), then the rest...</description></item><item><title>Re: Adjective and Adverb</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AdjectiveAndAdverb/lgqjr/post.htm#953031</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:38:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:953031</guid><dc:creator>grammar geek</dc:creator><description>Yes to the first one.   For the second one, a compound predicate means the subject did two things. Which sentence has the subject doing two things?</description></item><item><title>Adjective and Adverb</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AdjectiveAndAdverb/lgqjr/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:50:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:952986</guid><dc:creator>jacalyn_kay_bandor</dc:creator><description>I think the answer is adjective  
 The part of speech that answers the question “which one” is a/an  
   
 A.    preposition   
   
 B.    conjunction.  
 C.    adjective.   
   
 D.    adverb.  
    
  I am pretty sure the answers A  
    
   
 Which of the following sentences has a compound predicate?    
   
 A.    Heather and Casey played basketball and tennis all day.    
   
 B.    With the right investments, Steve thinks he can get rich.  
 
   C.    My whole family enjoys skiing and snowboarding.   
   
 D.    Yesterday I cleaned and painted my kitchen. &lt;/fon</description></item><item><title>Re: Usage of the word "worthy"</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/UsageOfTheWordWorthy/lgpmk/post.htm#952960</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:11:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:952960</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>When you use worthy as a predicate adjective, you have to introduce its complement with of .   So the x.2 versions are both wrong.   1.1 says you are good enough to have a knight! (What will you have him do for you? Some jousting perhaps?  )  2.1 says you are good enough to have this job. _________   You may be thinking of a slightly different usage.   This young athlete delivered a performance worthy of a champion.   worthy of = characteristic of.   Meaning:  This young athlete delivered a performance which makes him worthy of being called a champion.    CJ</description></item><item><title>Predicate Adjective</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PredicateAdjective/lgpkv/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:22:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:952718</guid><dc:creator>jacalyn_kay_bandor</dc:creator><description>I think its B So ill modifies Today, Is this correct?? 
 3. Which of the following sentences contains an italicized word that’s used as a 
 predicate adjective?  
 
 
 
 
  
     
     
  
    
     
  
 A.    Jerry looks   at  
  the map.    
 B.    Jerry looks   ill  
  today.    
 C.    Jerry looks into the  
  microscope.    
 D.    Jerry looks   disdainfully  
  at the pile of laundry.</description></item><item><title>Re: Predicate adjective</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PredicateAdjective/lgmjj/post.htm#952268</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 07:15:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:952268</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>Well, which one contains an italicized adjective?</description></item><item><title>The for-to-Infinitive-Construction</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TheInfinitiveConstruction/lzqvj/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:04:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:947997</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>The for-to-Infinitive Construction "is a construction in which the
infinitive is in predicate relation to a noun or a pronoun preceded by
the preposition for," L. A. Kaushanskaya (1970:200) In the sentence the for-to-Infinitive Construction can have the function of: -	a subject; e.g.	I think it is advisable for me to do my homework by next class.  -	a predicative; e.g.	It is for you to decide who of us is right. -	a complex object; e.g.	 We waited for John to start speaking.  -	an attribute; e.g.	The worst thing for you to do now is leave without saying a single word for apology. -	an adverbial modifier of purpose; e.g.	He leaned for me to see the stage.  -	an adverbial modifier of result. e.g.	She cried loud for you to hear her. ...</description></item><item><title>Re: Relative clause and passive?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/RelativeClauseAndPassive/lzldv/post.htm#946537</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:30:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:946537</guid><dc:creator>avangi</dc:creator><description>You have two finite verbs,  lives , and  is . So you have a compound predicate, requiring a conjunction:   The woman lives next door and is a doctor.   &amp;quot;Finite&amp;quot; has to do with time. If the verb has a tense, then there&amp;#39;s live action. Non-finite verbs ( living, caused ) are descriptive. The clause, &amp;quot;who lives next door&amp;quot; is also descriptive.   Sometimes it&amp;#39;s confusing, because finite and non-finite verbs can have the same form:   &amp;quot;caused&amp;quot; (simple past tense)  He caused the accident.   &amp;quot;caused&amp;quot; (past participle/adjective)  This is a caused incident.</description></item><item><title>Re: Help</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Help/lzkdb/post.htm#946441</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:01:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:946441</guid><dc:creator>gleb_chebrikoff</dc:creator><description>Dear friend,   Basically, any sentence consists of two parts. They are complete subject and complete predicate. Complete subject is the part of the sentence which names what is talked about, in your case, it is trains. The part which tells what is said about the complete subject is termed complete predicate - were slower a hundred years ago.   This, as you can see, is rather inconvenient and general division. Every subject is built around some noun or pronoun (as well as some other word classes), which is the simple subject of the sentence. Since in your example trains has no modifiers or determiners, it is both a complete and simple subject.   Likewise, complete predicate is formed around one verb group, in your case it&amp;#39;s were.  ...</description></item><item><title>Help</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Help/lzkdb/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:23:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:946238</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>What is the complete subject, complete preicate, simple subject &amp;amp; simple predicate in this sentence? 
  
 Trains were slower a hundred years ago.</description></item><item><title>Re: "is" in a Chinese language</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IsInAChineseLanguage/lzwzc/post.htm#945837</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 08:53:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:945837</guid><dc:creator>raen</dc:creator><description>Hmm, your observation is partially correct. There&amp;#39;s no &amp;quot;is&amp;quot; in context such as this in Chinese, contexts that involves attributes, conditions, situations etc. (there may be more, but that&amp;#39;s all I can think of now. Maybe other Chinese can help clarify, or even dispute it. Really, I haven&amp;#39;t thought about this before). However, I think when it comes to stating facts, &amp;quot;is&amp;quot; (or Be-verb) is supplied. For instance, &amp;quot;He IS from China&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;She IS my sister&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I AM a teacher&amp;quot;, etc...hmm, on a second thought, &amp;quot;is&amp;quot; (or all Be-verbs) is not used in a sentence sturcture called (I&amp;#39;m not so sure that&amp;#39;s what it&amp;#39;s called) &amp;quot;subject + predicate adjective&amp;quot;, like this,...</description></item><item><title>Re: Finite adverbial clauses</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FiniteAdverbialClauses/ldkrx/post.htm#937720</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:05:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:937720</guid><dc:creator>dokterjokkebrok</dc:creator><description>Hi A finite adverbial clause is a clause that functions as an adverb in a sentence and has a finite verb form in it.  Let&amp;#39;s use an finite adverbial of time as an example:         Every time I see him I am really scared.   (Every time I see him  = adverbial clause  						        (I am really scared       = main clause   In case of time adverbials, they can usually be replaced with the word &amp;#39; then &amp;#39;. They tell us something about time . (But other kinds of adverbials are also possible).      Then I am really scared.    When are you really scared?    Every time I see him!       To continue, you must know that verbs are either finite or non-finite.  A finite form shows tense  and usually if it&amp;#39;s singular/plural as well  (it...</description></item><item><title>Re: What's the difference between Attributive and Adjective?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhatsDifferenceBetweenAttributive-Adjective/ldkzz/post.htm#936699</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:10:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:936699</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;She is a beautiful girl.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Beautiful&amp;quot; is called an attributive adjective because it is IN FRONT OF the noun. If you say, &amp;quot;She is beautiful,&amp;quot; then it is called a predicate adjective because it&amp;#39;s part of the predicate (&amp;quot;predicate&amp;quot; = the verb and all the words after the verb).</description></item><item><title>Simple subject and a simple predicate</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SimpleSubjectSimplePredicate/lddcm/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:05:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:934383</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>what is a simple subject and predicate?</description></item><item><title>Re: Wonder</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Wonder/lcqhh/post.htm#933637</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:54:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:933637</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>1. Look the word up in the dictionary to find its meaning. 2. Check its part of speech. It it is a noun, you can use it as a subject or object; if it is a verb, you can use it as a simple predicate. If it is an adjective or adverb, you can use it to describe a noun or a verb. 3. TRY TO WRITE A SENTENCE USING IT. 4. Post your sentence here and we will check your effort.</description></item><item><title>Re: Vocabulary</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Vocabulary/lcjrc/post.htm#931176</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:42:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:931176</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>1. Look the word up in the dictionary to find its meaning. 2. Check its part of speech. It it is a noun , you can use it as a subject or object; if it is a verb , you can use it as a simple predicate. If it is an adjective or adverb , you can use it to describe a noun or a verb. 3. TRY TO WRITE A SENTENCE USING IT. 4. Post your sentence here and we will check your effort.</description></item><item><title>Re: Simple predict</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SimplePredict/lcvzl/post.htm#929855</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:00:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:929855</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>A simple predicate is the verb phrase of the sentence. I have underlined it in these two sentences.</description></item><item><title>Re: Simple subject and simple predicate</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SimpleSubjectSimplePredicate/lcdmz/post.htm#929648</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:35:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:929648</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>Just the base noun of the subject and the verb phrase . I have underlined them in these sentences:   The quick brown fox  jumped over the lazy dogs. The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. The unhappy fellow  had never met the girl of his dreams.</description></item><item><title>Simple subject and simple predicate</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SimpleSubjectSimplePredicate/lcdmz/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:23:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:929633</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>what is a simple subject and simple predicate??</description></item><item><title>Grammar</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Grammar/lccdd/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:40:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:929189</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>i have to label the simple subjects, verb or verb phrases, direct objects, indirect objects, and predicate nouns. Then I have to bracket any prepositional phrases and label the objects of the prepositions.  Here is the sentence: Susie and I attended the conference and then went to the mall for lunch and shopping.</description></item><item><title>Re: Compound subjects and compound predicates...</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CompoundSubjectsCompoundPredicates/3/gmpwj/Post.htm#923709</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:43:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:923709</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Compounds are connected with &amp;quot;and&amp;quot;. For example: 
  
 The swimmer&amp;#39;s skill and speed made him a winner. 
  
 &amp;quot;swimmer&amp;#39;s skill and speed&amp;quot; would be a compound subject with a simple predicate of &amp;quot;made&amp;quot; 
  
 The girl can run fast, jump far, and throw hard. 
  
 &amp;quot;girl&amp;quot; would be the simple subject with the compound predicate of &amp;quot;can run fast, jump far, and throw hard&amp;quot; 
  
 Hope this helps in the future!</description></item><item><title>Re: Compound subjects and compound predicates...</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CompoundSubjectsCompoundPredicates/3/gmpwj/Post.htm#923413</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:59:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:923413</guid><dc:creator>clive</dc:creator><description>Hi, 
 You seem to be missing some choices, eg g/h/i. 
 
  
 Clive</description></item><item><title>Re: Compound subjects and compound predicates...</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CompoundSubjectsCompoundPredicates/3/gmpwj/Post.htm#923340</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:01:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:923340</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>You know, I love this, because I have been battling the school (3rd grade) regarding this same subject. They don&amp;#39;t know what they are teaching.    Clive although your answers meet some of the requirements, please, if you can explain, why or what is going on with these particular problems. One question wrong was the difference between my twins getting a 100% or 75% on this TEST!   Choose the best answer for each:   1. What is the complete subject in this sentence?    The colorful flowers bloomed all spring.    a. bloomed    b. colorful flowers    c. The colorful flowers    d. bloomed all spring   2. What is the complete predicate in this sentence?    The lost puppy followed me home?    a. puppy    b. followed    c. The lost puppy   ...</description></item><item><title>Linking verbs Misuse</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LinkingVerbsMisuse/lrnkw/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:25:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:922666</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>I know that linking verbs must be followed by a predicate noun, predicate pronoun, or predicate adjective; these are linked back to the subject to rename or describe. 
  
 How does one explain commonly spoken and written sentences, like the following, that use a linking verb that is not followed with a predicate word: John is here.  
  
 (John is the subject, the linking verb = is. &amp;quot;Here&amp;quot; answers the question &amp;quot;where,&amp;quot; and would be a modifier of an action verb. Since &amp;quot;is&amp;quot; does not fit the definition of an action verb, is this sentence considered wrong, or is it acceptable even though it is grammatically incorrect? Or is it really grammatically incorrect?</description></item><item><title>Compound subject/predicate</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CompoundSubjectPredicate/lrngd/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:23:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:922593</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Rewrite each group of words to make it a complete sentence. Each sentence should have a compound subject or a compound predicate.   1. my swim goggles 2. the shovel 3. walk along the beach 4. swim underwater 5. my older brother   the way the directions are seems that we can&amp;#39;t add words</description></item><item><title>Re: Parsing/Diagraming</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ParsingDiagraming/kqldd/post.htm#917081</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:19:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:917081</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>No one - subject said   - verb that it would be easy - direct object   The verb and direct object together form the predicate.   The direct object is itself a subordinate clause:   it - subject would be - verb easy - predicate adjective   The verb and predicate adjective together form the predicate of this subordinate clause.   CJ</description></item><item><title>Re: Parsing/Diagraming</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ParsingDiagraming/kqldd/post.htm#917074</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:59:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:917074</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>No one / said (that it would be easy); subject = No one; said that it would be easy = predicate; said = verb; that = conjunction; that it would be easy = noun clause as object of &amp;quot;said&amp;quot;; it = subject of noun clause; would be easy = predicate of noun clause; would be = verb of noun clause ; easy = subject(ive) complement of &amp;quot;it.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Parsing/Diagraming</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ParsingDiagraming/kqldd/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:05:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:917051</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hi! 
  
 I&amp;#39;m having problems with this sentence that I am trying to parse: 
  
 &amp;quot;No one said that it would be easy.&amp;quot; 
  
 What I have so far is that it is the subject, would be is the predicate, and easy is the subject complement. I can&amp;#39;t figure out what to do with No one said . I would appreciate any help you can give me. I get the feeling that what I have so far may be wrong, but I&amp;#39;m not sure. 
  
 Thanks!</description></item><item><title>Re: Full syntactic analysis</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FullSyntacticAnalysis/kqwqd/post.htm#916651</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:42:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:916651</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>Is this a compound sentence, if not, what kind is it?-- No; it is a simple sentence with a compound predicate.   How should it be analysed at clause and phrase level?-- Here are the clauses and phrases:    He bought a box of colors and copied a magazine lithograph of a Japanese painting of Fujiyama.   a box of colors   a magazine lithograph of a Japanese painting of Fujiyama  a magazine lithograph  
  of a Japanese painting of Fujiyama  of Fujiyama    Please analyze them and we'll check your efforts</description></item><item><title>Re: Compound subjects and predicates</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CompoundSubjectsPredicates/kqwlh/post.htm#916481</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:17:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:916481</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>(1) simple subject: Tom; simple predicate: likes newspapers. (2) compound subject: Tom and Sue; simple predicate: read The Times; (3) simple subject: Mona; compound predicate: reads newspapers and writes poems; (4) compound subject: George and Mona; compound predicate: study grammar books and post questions on englishforums.com</description></item><item><title>Re: Sentence analysis</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceAnalysis/kqwqn/post.htm#916424</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:14:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:916424</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>May I try? (l) a siimple sentence. (2) it has a compound predicate. (3) the two predicates are connected by the coordinating conjunction &amp;quot;and&amp;quot;(4) predicate No. 1 = bought a box of colors. &amp;quot;box&amp;quot; is modified by &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; (an adjective); &amp;quot;a box&amp;quot; is modified by &amp;quot;of colors.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;of&amp;quot; is preposition. &amp;quot;colors&amp;quot; is object of preposition.PS.: some university books call &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; a determiner. I&amp;#39;m using traditional names. (5) predicate No. 2 = copied a magazine lithograph of a Japanese painting of Fujiyama; a magazine...Fujiyama is object of &amp;quot;copied&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;of ...painting&amp;quot; modifies &amp;quot;llithograph&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;of Fujiyama&amp;quot; modifies &amp;quot;painting.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Compound subjects and predicates</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CompoundSubjectsPredicates/kqwlh/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:29:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:916324</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>what is a compound subject and predicate</description></item><item><title>Re: Predicate Adjectives and Nouns!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PredicateAdjectivesNouns/kqzbq/post.htm#916019</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:46:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:916019</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Now may I try No. 4? days - are - hot. &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; under &amp;quot;days&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;in July&amp;quot; under &amp;quot;are&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;usually&amp;quot; under &amp;quot;are.&amp;quot; WHEN are they hot? in July; How often ARE they hot? usually. (P.S. I THINK (!) your teacher wants &amp;quot;in July&amp;quot; to modify the verb; university professors might say it modifies the whole sentence; I THINK &amp;quot;usually&amp;quot; modifies &amp;quot;are,&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;hot.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Usually&amp;quot; says how often, not to what degree (as &amp;quot;very&amp;quot; does). Hopefully, an expert will answer your post and correct my mistakes before you have to turn in your assignment.)</description></item><item><title>Re: Is or are</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IsOrAre/kqhgm/post.htm#916017</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:39:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:916017</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>Correct. ' Saying...is ' are the subject and verb, which are both singular. The plural 'words' in the predicate is a bit confusing, but does not really affect the verb choice.     PS: Those are the first two lines of the song "more than words".</description></item></channel></rss>