<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Prefixes tag:Affix' matching tags 'Prefixes' and 'Affix'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aPrefixes+tag%3aAffix&amp;tag=Prefixes,Affix&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Prefixes tag:Affix' matching tags 'Prefixes' and 'Affix'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3232.18851)</generator><item><title>Re: How affix affect stress pattern?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AffixAffectStressPattern/zrwmw/post.htm#420129</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:420129</guid><dc:creator>Mno3195</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Mister Micawber wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Offhand, I would say that the addition of affixes other than negative or negative-like prefixes do not generally affect word stress, since they are usually unstressed themselves-- but that there are also many exceptions.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I don't know of any dedicated websites, though most grammar sites probably mention it in passing.&amp;nbsp; Try googling around a bit.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,how about suffixes?&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: How affix affect stress pattern?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AffixAffectStressPattern/zrwbp/post.htm#419949</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:54:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:419949</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;Offhand, I would say that the addition of affixes other than negative or negative-like prefixes do not generally affect word stress, since they are usually unstressed themselves-- but that there are also many exceptions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't know of any dedicated websites, though most grammar sites probably mention it in passing.&amp;nbsp; Try googling around a bit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: How and where to use negative prefixes like un-,dis,non-,etc?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PrefixesNegativePrefixes/3/dwdxk/Post.htm#290982</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 06:28:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:290982</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>If anything I would say it is regressive since the affix is changing depending on the following phonemes. Ill try to figure it out and report back in a few minutes.</description></item><item><title>KiB, MiB, KB, MB are prefixes or suffixes?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PrefixesSuffixes/bpzjq/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:49:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:158830</guid><dc:creator>McoreD</dc:creator><description>Hi Guys, &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
By definition: &lt;b&gt;prefix&lt;/b&gt; is a type of &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affix" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affix"&gt;affix&lt;/a&gt; that precedes the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morpheme" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morpheme"&gt;morphemes&lt;/a&gt; to which it can attach. A &lt;b&gt;suffix&lt;/b&gt; is an &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affix" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affix"&gt;affix&lt;/a&gt; that succeeds the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morpheme" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morpheme"&gt;morphemes&lt;/a&gt; to which it can attach.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So when you say 700 MiB, is "MiB" really a prefix or a suffix? It's
amazing to see almost every popular article use the phrases "binary
prefixes", "SI prefixes" etc. &lt;br&gt;
For example: &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prefix%20" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prefix%20"&gt;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prefix &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_prefix" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_prefix"&gt;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_prefix&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html" target="_blank" title="http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html"&gt;
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Why they use the word "prefix" instead of "suffix" is beyond me. Can anybody please explain? &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thank you in advance, &lt;br&gt;
McoreD&lt;br&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>