Do not underline titles, that is a printer's tool. A document title, such as in your example, is either italicized or has quotation marks around it. For example, a book title is italicized but a chapter title has quotation marks around it. See

Thanks, everyone. According to The American Heritage Guide to Contemporary Usage and Style: With other punctuation Put commas and periods inside closing quotation marks; put colons and semicolons outside. Other punctuation, such as exclamation

Jingtian, The New York Times style book says: periods and commas, in American usage, always go inside the closing quotation marks, regardless of grammatical logic. Another source gives this example: ...two complete thoughts joined by

Is my use of the word ideology correct in the following sentence, also, is it improper to use quotation marks around words in a formal paper? The ideology of "traditional" or "normal" family is presented in the opening of

Well, I can finally put this one to bed: In The Grammar Bible, which I love as a reference, it states that "the comma and the period go inside the closing quotation marks at all times. There are no exceptions to this rule" (Strumpf and

Ok, I'm stuck with something. I'm writing a book and I am using the dialog line because I come from a country where that is how we write dialog. Example: - Hello, she said. - Hi, he answered. Now since I moved into an english talking

The accepted method is: "Is that you , Susan?" he asked the maid downstairs . There are two 'rules' involved here. (1) The punctuation within the quoation marks belongs to the quote or utterance and is not a punctuation of the overall sentence.

direct speech /qouted speech Saying exactly what someone has said is called direct speech (sometimes called quoted speech) Here what a person says appears within quotation marks ("...") and should be word for word. For

} Inverted commas is the British name for quotation marks. Used to be. Get a newer book. "Inverted commas" is still the more usual BrE term. "Quotation marks" is used and understood, but is not idiomatic in BrE. I think that it

Christopher Johnson wrote (in a response to Bob Lieblich re "quotation marks" v "inverted commas"): I'm not American, Bob. I'm British, so I don't have to call "them" what you call "them", and