<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Quotation marks tag:Resume' matching tags 'Quotation marks' and 'Resume'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aQuotation+marks+tag%3aResume&amp;tag=Quotation+marks,Resume&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Quotation marks tag:Resume' matching tags 'Quotation marks' and 'Resume'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3191.21962)</generator><item><title>Re: Origin of definiteness</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/OriginOfDefiniteness/vmbhw/post.htm#393456</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 04:17:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:393456</guid><dc:creator>Believer</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you, Clive.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I found my writing left much to be desired and I made some effort to self-correct. I still don't know how to cut and paste, so I am going to rewrite the whole thing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thank you, Clive. I am not trying to &lt;STRIKE&gt;circumvent &lt;/STRIKE&gt;(this word doesn't seem to fit in this context so&amp;nbsp;I will replace it with 'go&amp;nbsp;around answering') your question, but let me&amp;nbsp;put my answer to your question (should be better to write 'let me answer like this' -- more direct)&amp;nbsp;like this: as you said,&amp;nbsp; according to how I interpreted (&lt;EM&gt;understood &lt;/EM&gt;or &lt;EM&gt;see&lt;/EM&gt; can work too) it, article usage usually &lt;STRIKE&gt;are &lt;/STRIKE&gt;(should be &lt;EM&gt;is&lt;/EM&gt;) influenced by how a person is thinking at the time of his writing. Many readers might disagree with his &lt;STRIKE&gt;uses&lt;/STRIKE&gt; (or usage or use is better since I am using it&amp;nbsp;generally and not about any specific uses)&amp;nbsp;of articles, but to me, that doesn't make his usage of the articles he used less&amp;nbsp;valid. I think&amp;nbsp;Mr M said long ago (a long time ago might be good too) that something to the effect that in order for effective communication to occur, there &lt;STRIKE&gt;has&lt;/STRIKE&gt; (should be &lt;EM&gt;have&lt;/EM&gt;) to be an understanding and agreement (might be better to switch places like&amp;nbsp;'agreement and an understanding')on a writer's article uses (might be better to write 'usage of articles') in a writing. To me, that means it is best to have agreement on uses but not having agreement doesn't make his writing any less &lt;STRIKE&gt;of a writing&lt;/STRIKE&gt; (seems grammatically wrong: should be 'any less acceptable') -- it is still &lt;STRIKE&gt;a writing&lt;/STRIKE&gt; (very wrong -- should be 'a piece of writing') to be read, eventhough it might be a less effective one. Right now, I am trying to write more and&amp;nbsp;in furtherance of that (or that effort), I am posting some &lt;STRIKE&gt;writings&lt;/STRIKE&gt; (wrong again, should be "some writing') in this forum to get some help. In addition, I am searching (should add 'for') free online help sites &lt;STRIKE&gt;for writing better&lt;/STRIKE&gt; (awkward -- better if written 'that will help me write better') to get more information. Do you have any advice for me? I am&amp;nbsp;trying to dive in and learn by doing.&amp;nbsp;I presume&amp;nbsp;what you &lt;STRIKE&gt;mean&lt;/STRIKE&gt; (OKbut it is better to use&amp;nbsp; 'meant' since&amp;nbsp;your writing was done in the past) by 'ordinary' English is English for &lt;STRIKE&gt;common or ordinary&lt;/STRIKE&gt; (very awkward -- should be replaced with the phrase in the quotation marks 'common everyday') writing, not for formal, reseach-type writing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That was&amp;nbsp;hard work. Did I do a fine job -- always appreciate your help?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;T&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Is it always so?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IsItAlwaysSo/dzxwl/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:38:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:279321</guid><dc:creator>Believer</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;I think GG said in a post that&amp;nbsp;American style guides put&amp;nbsp;commas and periods inside the quotation marks, always. OK.&amp;nbsp;Does that mean they are to be followed regardless how short or long the ones in quotation are?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;eg,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;... such as 'a,' 'an,' or 'the.'&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How about if I use double apostrophes, is the American style guide permit that?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;... such as "a," "an," or "the."&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please note (I presume you already have noticed it) these are very short words. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why does a comma go before the closing quotation mark?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DoesCommaClosingQuotationMark/dzmpm/post.htm#278863</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:41:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:278863</guid><dc:creator>Believer</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So for the cases below, commas will be placed inside the quotation marks, &lt;U&gt;no matter how&amp;nbsp;short the content in&amp;nbsp;quotes is.&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is this right? I found the following partical sentences from the Collins/Cobuild Compact English Learner's Dictionary, which I presume is published?? by a British&amp;nbsp; company, and thus follows the British convention.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;According to AME,&amp;nbsp;commas will go inside:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;... must have a word such as 'a,' 'an,' 'the,' or 'my' in front of it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;... For example, you can say 'She was glad,' but you do not ...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But according to BrE,&amp;nbsp;commas will go outside of the quotation marks. Right??&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;... must have a word such as 'a', 'an', 'the', or 'my' in front of it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;... For example, you can say 'She was glad', but you do not ...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: When quoting  words or  phrases or sentences</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/QuotingWordsPhrasesSentences/ddhlp/post.htm#267527</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:21:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:267527</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;When you are quoting a word or a phrase or a sentence&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; or using the
word/phrase/sentence quoted&amp;nbsp;, is your only option is to put it in
quotation (in quotation marks)? Can I slant it when will it be&amp;nbsp;OK?&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br&gt;'Slant it' means put it in italics, I presume.&amp;nbsp; If you are writing a formal paper, stick to the quotation marks (" ").&amp;nbsp; If it is a word or short phrase, you can use single quotation marks (' ')-- but also check with the person to whom it will be submitted; some have their druthers.&amp;nbsp; In less formal situations, italics or underlining often work as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;Should the sentence in parenthesis&amp;nbsp;have a period in the end after the&amp;nbsp;word "free trade"? &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wouldn't-- it just clutters the sentence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Are the sentences right?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AreTheSentencesRight/cgxjn/post.htm#200732</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 10:48:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:200732</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;1-- yes&lt;br&gt;2-- yes&lt;br&gt;3-- yes&lt;br&gt;4-- yes&lt;br&gt;5-- probably&lt;br&gt;6-- I presume you mean&lt;i&gt; the phrase in &lt;b&gt;quotation marks&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.&amp;nbsp; I would hyphenate &lt;i&gt;How-to-do&lt;/i&gt; when it is an adjective.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: When a sentence begins with But, For or So</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceBegins/qcpd/post.htm#79444</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 03:49:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:79444</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><description>&lt;br /&gt;These are really not good words with which to begin a sentence-- they are conjunctions which suggest a close relationship with what precedes-- so please me cautious in doing so.  In your examples:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;'So, in fact and in all truth, the' -- the comma placement is fine, but the 'in fact and in all truth' is horribly clichÃ© and should be excised.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;'For the lowliest of servants and the richest of lords, are all viewed as the same,' -- never use a comma to separate subject from its verb, which I presume 'servants and...lords' and 'are' are, respectively.  I cannot judge your second comma without knowing what follows.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;'But, even as we find ourselves "In The Lord," let us each be at Peace, both with other men, and with our present' -- The first comma should be removed (no comma between doubled conjunctions); the second comma should be outside the quotation mark; and no comma after 'men'.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>