Hi, I'd change these: 5. The sun was eclipsed by the moon. ACTIVE PASSIVE 9. This bone has been buried by the dog . PASSIVE 10. It takes a long time to think of these examples . PASSIVE ACTIVE 13. There was a cup of coffee on the table but now

Hi Danijela, I am so sorry! I think there has been some miscommunication. Please don't go away! I am just like you coming to this forum to get my doubts clarified. I am not the teacher. English is not my mother tongue. 'Lost in

Hey, Thanks. Sorry for the spelling mistake. Regards, Adnan

As a native-speaker of Dutch, I can tell you that the Dutch language, at times, can be quite difficult to grap for English people. It has a lot of illogical spelling rules and other grammatical pitfalls. That's why I take the view that,

Thank You guys!! i really appreciate your help in my confusion! regards, IZZA!

Hi I didn't mean to undermine your answer. I'm sorry if I implied such a thing, but I was merely giving an example and saying that, given the actual pronunciation of most of these suffixes, I find it more logical to use -ize, since people

Either p.m. or PM I wouldn't know about Sept. and Sep. Regards Dokterjokkebrok

Hi I wasn't questioning you, but simply wondering about the subject. Regards Jordy

Yes, IATA can be used and viewed as a noun. However, it is also possible to use it like an adjective -- i.e. to modify another noun. For example: IATA regulations IATA airport codes Okay. I see what you are getting at there. But isn't that

IATA is an abbreviation, can it be treated as a word if yes than, what it will be a noun, adjective..???] Clearly a noun. It remains an abbreviation of International Air Transport Association, of which Association is the head word and belongs to