Good evening, Chris, these are thought-provoking questions you have asked, and here is my opinion backed up by data from authoritative sources. 1. The possibility of tell filling the slot of talk in the example sentence seems questionable at

Hi. Thank you again. Do you think the placement of commas for these is correct? I think what I am trying to ask is if some words or phrases or clauses (possible?) exist and if those can leave a possibility of readers of the sentence with

In sentence The police found the weapon ,which made prosecutor's job easier . My friend says which is refering to weapon and hence this construcion is wrong .He says it should be The police found the weapon,making prosecutpr's job

The police found the murder weapon,which made the prosecutor's job much easier As others have said, the sentence is correct (if you add a space after the comma and a full stop / period at the end). In theory, which can refer to both the

My suggested version: Many people develop an eating disorder, which can lead to diabetes, heart attacks or other obesity-related illnesses. Sincerely, James (P.S. the comma is necessary after "disorder" because the relative pronoun

Yes, initially I also thought that was the difference. But as you can see the comments I've gotten, it seems that you don't have to have at least three even when you use the first sentence. Yes, I do know full well how people actually use

I'm not really expert in this stuff. It has to do with the antecedent of "which." What does which refer to?? The relative pronoun "which" becomes the subject of the relative clause. When the "which" clause is

My preference is this one: Frame at least ten wh-questions that have answers which can be found in the paragraph. My second preference is #2. Of the three, it is the most natural expression, with the relative pronoun closest to its antecedent. My

Hi. Would you say we can use both relative pronouns (are they?) "which" and "that" with restrictive clauses? Or would you say that only the use of the pronoun "that" (for human and non-human) is correct for a

1)Does the phrase need these words in bold to be grammatical, or do you think the group of words in the exemplary sentence are fine as a phrase; that is, they don't need their subjects and/or verbs? Is there rule for when they don't need