In my terminology what is a relative pronoun which is inclusive of the antecedent in your sentence. A leading figure in the Scottish enlightenment, Adam Smith's two major books are to democratic capitalism what Marx's Das Kapital is to

XD: I've just been thinking about the differences, and trying to come to some guidelines. Here it goes... Those can introduce a relative clause; them cannot. Those can be used in nominative case; them cannot. Examples: I like those who tell

For my brother to feel, that he does not know the right term, must seem a real impediment. Hi frankie, thanks for joining us. Welcome to English Forums. Nix the comma after "feel." The feeling is bad. If this were your sentence, the

I'm so cross with myself. I can't even cite material correctly. Join the club! Have you finally got it right? Here is the sentence! It was on his way back past them, carrying a large burger, that he heard what they were saying. He =

Secondly, does a noun phrase always have a complementizer at the start of it (head)? No. According to the description in Wiki, complementizers are the syntactic head of a full clause. A noun phrase is not a full clause. Example: "the grand

The dealership that sold more cars eded up losing more money. =adjective clause My trouble was that they had never been there before=predicate nominative (noun phrase) Question: What type of pronoun is that in the second sentence? It's not a

Hi, 1) Question: A relative clause and adjective clause are the same thing, correct? 2) The dealership that sold more cars eded up losing more money. =adjective clause My trouble was that they had never been there before=predicate nominative (noun

Anaylsis of the large structure: Independent clause #1 : I can not tell you that, mate, Conjunction joining two independent clauses: but Independent clause #2: what I can tell you is that it was one day before my birthday ____________________

whoever - pronoun, object of preposition "to" Hi, Shouldn't it be "whomever"? - A. Don't think so, because the case of relative pronoun is governed by the dependent clause (nominative, in this instance). So why

whoever - pronoun, object of preposition "to" Hi, Shouldn't it be "whomever"? - A. Don't think so, because the case of relative pronoun is governed by the dependent clause (nominative, in this instance).