<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Simple present tag:Dates' matching tags 'Simple present' and 'Dates'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aSimple+present+tag%3aDates&amp;tag=Simple+present,Dates&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Simple present tag:Dates' matching tags 'Simple present' and 'Dates'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3168.38637)</generator><item><title>Re: I thought a spider is/was an insect</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ThoughtSpiderInsect/2/gcbgr/Post.htm#511343</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:25:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:511343</guid><dc:creator>Grammar Geek</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;#39;ll note the time of post, Jim and I posted a minute apart, clearly writing our posts at the same time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;nbsp;thought *only* simple present is (oops, should be was) correct, but I thought wrong.&amp;nbsp; I now know that both present tense and past tense are possible&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NO! &amp;quot;&lt;em&gt;I thought...&amp;quot; &lt;/em&gt;REQUIRES past. Present tense is NOT possible!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It doesn&amp;#39;t have to turn out to be false.It can turn out that what you thought came true.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A: You&amp;#39;re so smart to have brought your umbrella. Can I share it?&lt;br /&gt;B: Of course you can. Even though the forecast didn&amp;#39;t call for it, I thought it might rain. I&amp;#39;m sure glad I brought it!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A: Why didn&amp;#39;t you want to date me in high school?&lt;br /&gt;B: Back when we were in high school, I thought you were a jerk. Now I KNOW you are a jerk. Go away.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You avoid the confusion by &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; using the past after &amp;quot;I thought,&amp;quot; (unless it&amp;#39;s an internal dialogue as Jim suggests above, which is NOT part of typical narrative writing).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Proud</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Proud/vkwlw/post.htm#385721</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:22:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:385721</guid><dc:creator>whl626</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;All Malaysians feel proud.&amp;nbsp; ( when using a simple past, it is better to specify a date OR simply put simple present )&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They were proud of Malaysia. ( there is not wrong to use ' for ' but using ' of ' is much better )&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They feel proud because they were Malaysians. ( were or feel is a preference but the latter sounds better )&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: This is the first time Hamas *is running* candidates for parliament.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FirstHamasRunningCandidates-Parliament/2/ddcxw/Post.htm#266126</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:32:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:266126</guid><dc:creator>Marius Hancu</dc:creator><description>&lt;font size="2"&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Welkins2139 wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="2"&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Marius Hancu wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Welkins2139 wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;According to Michael
Swan, we use a simple present perfect tense in sentences like
that.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Could you give some of Swan's examples? &lt;br&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="2"&gt;This is the first time that I've heard her sing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="2"&gt;Page 424. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;font size="2"&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Indeed, it is there, in the &lt;b&gt;past time (5): simple present perfect and simple past (advanced points) section/this is the first time&lt;/b&gt;, and it is correct, of course. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The use of the present perfect with &lt;i&gt;this is the first time&lt;/i&gt; is the preferred one in the classical literature, but this doesn't eliminate the validity of&amp;nbsp;
sentences such as this one in The New York Times, which I'm sure has
qualified editors: &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
-------&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;&lt;font size="2"&gt;&lt;a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F30C14FB39550C7A8CDDAA0894DE404482" target="_blank" title="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F30C14FB39550C7A8CDDAA0894DE404482"&gt;THE MEDIA BUSINESS: ADVERTISING; Marketers Follow the Flock to Spring Break&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p class="summary"&gt;&lt;font size="2"&gt; ... .     ''&lt;b&gt;This is the first time that we're&lt;/b&gt; trying to capture the emotional ...&lt;a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F30C14FB39550C7A8CDDAA0894DE404482" target="_blank" title="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F30C14FB39550C7A8CDDAA0894DE404482"&gt;View free preview&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="details"&gt;&lt;font size="2"&gt;March 9, 2006
-  By Julie Bosman&amp;nbsp;(NYT) -  Education
-  &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="2"&gt;News&lt;br&gt;
----------&lt;br&gt;
&lt;font size="2"&gt;&lt;br&gt;

See the present continuous in use, which&lt;em&gt;, &lt;/em&gt;as I said in my first post in this thread: &lt;br&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="2"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;i&gt;
gives one the feeling of participation to something still going on&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/em&gt;
Aperisic has provided convincing arguments in the above. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;

 &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: This is the first time Hamas *is running* candidates for parliament.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FirstHamasRunningCandidates-Parliament/2/ddcmb/Post.htm#266085</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:07:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:266085</guid><dc:creator>Welkins2139</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Marius Hancu wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Welkins2139 wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;According to Michael Swan, we use a simple present perfect tense in sentences like that.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Could you give some of Swan's examples? &lt;BR&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is the first time that I've heard her sing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Page 424. &lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: This is the first time Hamas *is running* candidates for parliament.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FirstHamasRunningCandidates-Parliament/ddcdm/post.htm#265943</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:56:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:265943</guid><dc:creator>Marius Hancu</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Welkins2139 wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;According to Michael Swan, we use a simple present perfect tense in sentences like that.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Could you give some of Swan's examples? &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: This is the first time Hamas *is running* candidates for parliament.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FirstHamasRunningCandidates-Parliament/ddbhh/post.htm#265717</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 02:14:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:265717</guid><dc:creator>Welkins2139</dc:creator><description>According to Michael Swan, we use a simple present perfect tense in sentences like that.</description></item><item><title>Re: Some questions on grammar</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SomeQuestionsOnGrammar/cnlkb/post.htm#234261</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:56:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:234261</guid><dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;1. Is this sentence correct? Why not delete the preposition "on" and write as :&amp;nbsp;Which day was your last anniversary? &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;On which day was your last anniversary?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt; Either is OK. It depends on whether you are thinking of the anniversary as an event or as a date. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;2.&amp;nbsp;I thought the uses of the&amp;nbsp;verbs "do" and "are" are very different and leave very little room for confusion but are these sentences valid? Their meaning seems to be slightly&amp;nbsp;different though.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;Do you feel like a king?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;Are you feeling like a king?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;Obviously, you need a context for this 'king' stuff. Your question really seems to be about Simple Present versus Present Continuous.&amp;nbsp;Let's look at&amp;nbsp;simpler examples.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;&lt;EM&gt;I feel sick.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I am feeling sick.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;These both sound acceptable to me, and for these examples there is very little difference in meaning. Possibly #2 sounds just a little more temporary, a little less definite.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best wishes, Clive&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: since</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Since/czndz/post.htm#195420</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:15:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:195420</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;thank you very much. Can you comment on these sentences?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1. Since 1998&lt;/STRONG&gt;, UT admissions &lt;B&gt;does not require&lt;/B&gt; top-10 percenters to submit any test scores, although most do.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;(here I don't understand why simple present is used instead of present perfect)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=%22Since+1998%2C+UT+admissions+does+not+require+top-10+percenters+to+submit+any+test+scores%2C+although+most+do.%22&amp;amp;fr=FP-tab-web-t&amp;amp;toggle=1&amp;amp;cop=&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;u=www.pbs.org/weta/washingtonweek/voices/200206/0617exam.html&amp;amp;w=%22since+1998+ut+admissions+does+not+require+top+10+percenters+to+submit+any+test+scores%22&amp;amp;d=HlNmAW1aMJ-g&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us" target="_blank" title="http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=%22Since+1998%2C+UT+admissions+does+not+require+top-10+percenters+to+submit+any+test+scores%2C+although+most+do.%22&amp;amp;fr=FP-tab-web-t&amp;amp;toggle=1&amp;amp;cop=&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;u=www.pbs.org/weta/washingtonweek/voices/200206/0617exam.html&amp;amp;w=%22since+1998+ut+admissions+does+not+require+top+10+percenters+to+submit+any+test+scores%22&amp;amp;d=HlNmAW1aMJ-g&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;2. Indeed, to Telli's knowledge, no-one from the settlement&lt;B&gt; &lt;U&gt;had ever even seen &lt;/U&gt;&lt;/B&gt;a human being from outside the community&lt;B&gt; &lt;U&gt;since&lt;/U&gt; &lt;/B&gt;their ancestors&lt;B&gt; &lt;U&gt;had arrived &lt;/U&gt;&lt;/B&gt;there with Drakis the prophet&lt;B&gt; &lt;U&gt;three centuries before.&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;(here it seems to me as if the use of "had arrived" after "since" is natural, but you considered "I hadn't seen them since they had been married" wrong. Then, would this be correct too: "I hadn't seen them since they had been married three years before.")&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=%22Indeed%2C+to+Telli%27s+knowledge%2C+no-one+from+the+settlement+had+ever+even+seen+a+human+being+from+outside+the+community+since+their+ancestors+had+arrived+there+with+Drakis+the+prophet+three+centuries+before.%22&amp;amp;fr=FP-tab-web-t&amp;amp;toggle=1&amp;amp;cop=&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;u=www.freeonlinereading.com/C1e.htm&amp;amp;w=%22indeed+to+telli%27s+knowledge+no+one+from+the+settlement+had+ever+even+seen+a+human%22&amp;amp;d=RP0P121aMOhr&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us" target="_blank" title="http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=%22Indeed%2C+to+Telli%27s+knowledge%2C+no-one+from+the+settlement+had+ever+even+seen+a+human+being+from+outside+the+community+since+their+ancestors+had+arrived+there+with+Drakis+the+prophet+three+centuries+before.%22&amp;amp;fr=FP-tab-web-t&amp;amp;toggle=1&amp;amp;cop=&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;u=www.freeonlinereading.com/C1e.htm&amp;amp;w=%22indeed+to+telli%27s+knowledge+no+one+from+the+settlement+had+ever+even+seen+a+human%22&amp;amp;d=RP0P121aMOhr&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;Has&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;anyone&lt;B&gt; &lt;U&gt;ever escaped&lt;/U&gt; &lt;/B&gt;the Khrelling&lt;B&gt; &lt;U&gt;since&lt;/U&gt; &lt;/B&gt;you&lt;B&gt; &lt;U&gt;have been&lt;/U&gt; &lt;/B&gt;here, Seth?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;( Why not "were" instead of "have been" after "since"?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=%22Indeed%2C+to+Telli%27s+knowledge%2C+no-one+from+the+settlement+had+ever+even+seen+a+human+being+from+outside+the+community+since+their+ancestors+had+arrived+there+with+Drakis+the+prophet+three+centuries+before.%22&amp;amp;fr=FP-tab-web-t&amp;amp;toggle=1&amp;amp;cop=&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;u=www.freeonlinereading.com/C1e.htm&amp;amp;w=%22indeed+to+telli%27s+knowledge+no+one+from+the+settlement+had+ever+even+seen+a+human%22&amp;amp;d=RP0P121aMOhr&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us" target="_blank" title="http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=%22Indeed%2C+to+Telli%27s+knowledge%2C+no-one+from+the+settlement+had+ever+even+seen+a+human+being+from+outside+the+community+since+their+ancestors+had+arrived+there+with+Drakis+the+prophet+three+centuries+before.%22&amp;amp;fr=FP-tab-web-t&amp;amp;toggle=1&amp;amp;cop=&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;u=www.freeonlinereading.com/C1e.htm&amp;amp;w=%22indeed+to+telli%27s+knowledge+no+one+from+the+settlement+had+ever+even+seen+a+human%22&amp;amp;d=RP0P121aMOhr&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4. &lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;He&lt;B&gt; &lt;U&gt;ate&lt;/U&gt; &lt;/B&gt;well for the first time&lt;B&gt; &lt;U&gt;since&lt;/U&gt; &lt;/B&gt;he&lt;B&gt; &lt;U&gt;had left&lt;/U&gt; &lt;/B&gt;the camp for his last shift of work.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;(to me, this is the weirdest one. O wonder whether "since" here is used as a time conjunction or reason conjunction. If time conjunction, how can you explain its use in this sequence? "simple past // since // past perfect"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=%22Indeed%2C+to+Telli%27s+knowledge%2C+no-one+from+the+settlement+had+ever+even+seen+a+human+being+from+outside+the+community+since+their+ancestors+had+arrived+there+with+Drakis+the+prophet+three+centuries+before.%22&amp;amp;fr=FP-tab-web-t&amp;amp;toggle=1&amp;amp;cop=&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;u=www.freeonlinereading.com/C1e.htm&amp;amp;w=%22indeed+to+telli%27s+knowledge+no+one+from+the+settlement+had+ever+even+seen+a+human%22&amp;amp;d=RP0P121aMOhr&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us" target="_blank" title="http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=%22Indeed%2C+to+Telli%27s+knowledge%2C+no-one+from+the+settlement+had+ever+even+seen+a+human+being+from+outside+the+community+since+their+ancestors+had+arrived+there+with+Drakis+the+prophet+three+centuries+before.%22&amp;amp;fr=FP-tab-web-t&amp;amp;toggle=1&amp;amp;cop=&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;u=www.freeonlinereading.com/C1e.htm&amp;amp;w=%22indeed+to+telli%27s+knowledge+no+one+from+the+settlement+had+ever+even+seen+a+human%22&amp;amp;d=RP0P121aMOhr&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;5. &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;By now&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; most language teachers in the United States and Canada &lt;B&gt;&lt;U&gt;have heard&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/B&gt; about my Total Physical Response (TPR) approach. (Asher)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(here is it possible to use any other tenses instead of present perfect?)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;6. I &lt;B&gt;am&lt;/B&gt; the legitimate candidate for it &lt;B&gt;since 1998&lt;/B&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;(here is it corect to use "am"?)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;7. We &lt;B&gt;lead&lt;/B&gt; a very quiet life &lt;B&gt;since&lt;/B&gt; Ralph &lt;B&gt;retired.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;(Is "since" a reason conjunction here? If it is a time conjunction, is there anything wrong with tense choices?" &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Adverbs of Time</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AdverbsOfTime/bqmxq/post.htm#165851</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 00:42:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:165851</guid><dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;is it true&amp;nbsp;that certain time adverbs can only be used with certain tenses?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;I think you should look at each adverb and think a little more carefully about whether&amp;nbsp;you can use it with another tense. Try to make some sentences. I just went through and thought of the&amp;nbsp;following examples. Maybe you can think of more. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best wishes, Clive&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;1. simple present : with frequency adverbs, on Sundays..., in the mornings..., everyday, every Sunday/summer...&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt; Last year, I called my mother every day.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;2. present continuous: now, at the moment, at present, currently, &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;Last year, I called my mother every day. Now, I don't call her.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;3. simple past: freuency adverbs, yesterday, last week..., two days...ago, in 1999, at 7&amp;nbsp;o'clock, for, lately, recently &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;I was watching TV yesterday, ewhen my mother called.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;4. present perfect: frequency adverbs, now, just, already, yet, since, for, recently, lately, so far, up to/till now, as yet, to date, for the past two weeks..., in the last two&amp;nbsp;weeks..., &amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;I had just gone to bed when my mother called.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;5. simple future: tomorrow, next week...on Monday, &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;I called my mother on Monday.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Adverbs of Time</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AdverbsOfTime/bqmhm/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 17:12:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:165728</guid><dc:creator>Diamondrg</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;is it true&amp;nbsp;that certain time adverbs can only be used with certain tenses?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. simple present : with frequency adverbs, on Sundays..., in the mornings..., everyday, every Sunday/summer...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. present continuous: now, at the moment, at present, currently, &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. simple past: freuency adverbs, yesterday, last week..., two days...ago, in 1999, at 7&amp;nbsp;o'clock, for, lately, recently&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4. present perfect: frequency adverbs, now, just, already, yet, since, for, recently, lately, so far, up to/till now, as yet, to date, for the past two weeks..., in the last two&amp;nbsp;weeks..., &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;5. simple future: tomorrow, next week...on Monday, &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;is there anything wrong or anything to add? &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>