<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Singular Verbs' matching tag 'Singular Verbs'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aSingular+Verbs</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Singular Verbs' matching tag 'Singular Verbs'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>XMOD (Build: 3614.32638)</generator><item><title>Re: Having respect for and devotion to the natural world</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HavingRespectDevotionNatural-World/lpbln/post.htm#992956</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:33:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:992956</guid><dc:creator>avangi</dc:creator><description>No. Each adjective takes its own (different) preposition.   When you switch to the verbals, you have new problems. They don&amp;#39;t work in parallel.   You have respect for X.   You can devote the next four hours to homework. You can devote yourself to improving. You can be devoted to improving. (You can  respect  the world, but you can&amp;#39;t  devote  the world.)   &amp;quot;It&amp;quot; refers to the entire bolded participial phrase.   I don&amp;#39;t understand where you want to put the &amp;quot;they.&amp;quot; The simple subject is &amp;quot;having,&amp;quot; which is singular. You might suspect the verb &amp;quot;need&amp;quot; is plural, but it&amp;#39;s actually subjunctive singular.  &amp;quot;Money and power  are   intoxicating.&amp;quot; (compound subject, plural verb) ...</description></item><item><title>Re: Allow or Allows?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AllowOrAllows/2/lxphb/Post.htm#992399</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:46:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:992399</guid><dc:creator>yoong liat</dc:creator><description>I have never seen &amp;#39;police&amp;#39; used with a singular verb.   I am a mud as far as English is concerned. My understanding is, &amp;quot; police&amp;quot; is one of those words  considered correct in both plural or singula r, depending on the writer&amp;#39;s delivery and context in which he makes his point.   The police are the official organization that is responsible for making sure that people obey the law.       The police are also looking for a second car...       Police say they have arrested twenty people following the disturbances...     (Collins Cobuild Dictionary)</description></item><item><title>Re: Was or were</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WasOrWere/lxlzx/post.htm#991016</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:27:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:991016</guid><dc:creator>kooyeen</dc:creator><description>I think it&amp;#39;s because the verb agrees with &amp;quot;all I wanted&amp;quot;, and for some reason that needs a singular verb. However, sometimes you might find that someone also uses a plural verb if a plural noun follows: All I needed was/were two speakers.  I don&amp;#39;t have any technical explanations to give you though.</description></item><item><title>Re: Conan Obrien</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ConanObrien/lkbrq/post.htm#968190</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:59:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:968190</guid><dc:creator>pleasehelp</dc:creator><description>Singular verb as in &amp;#39;it&amp;#39;? But the show itself is also a singular entity so the verb should be singular too. Correct?   Thanks.</description></item><item><title>Re: Conan Obrien</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ConanObrien/lkbrq/post.htm#968175</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:38:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:968175</guid><dc:creator>dimsumexpress</dc:creator><description>Yes! The show is treated as a 3rd person so singular verb (has) is called for.</description></item><item><title>Re: Soles</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Soles/ljwww/post.htm#965406</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:42:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:965406</guid><dc:creator>avangi</dc:creator><description>The subject of the sentence is &amp;quot;thing,&amp;quot; so you use the singular verb &amp;quot;is.&amp;quot;   The only  things   I like  are   the cars  and   the girls.   The only things I like about it are the car and the girl.   The only thing I like about it  is   the girls.</description></item><item><title>Re: Proper use of "is" or "are"</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProperUseOfIsOrAre/ljcgx/post.htm#963714</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:11:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:963714</guid><dc:creator>avangi</dc:creator><description>If you&amp;#39;re going to use the plural verb, I&amp;#39;d repeat the article: &amp;quot;a book and a workbook.&amp;quot;   &amp;quot;Book and workbook&amp;quot; are often considered a unit, and (as they say) if you think of them in that way, you may use the singular verb.</description></item><item><title>Re: Another IS vs ARE question!!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AnotherIsVsAreQuestion/lwpdl/post.htm#962445</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:55:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:962445</guid><dc:creator>ivanhr</dc:creator><description>The first sentence is correct. 
  
 When used as a subject &amp;#39;each&amp;#39; takes singular verbs.</description></item><item><title>Re: Use of "is" or "are" with neither</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/UseOfIsOrAreWithNeither/lwjmh/post.htm#960900</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:14:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:960900</guid><dc:creator>coloraday</dc:creator><description>After neither of+noun/pronoun ,we use a singular verb in  a formal style. - Neither of my sisters is married.  In an informal style,you can use a plural verb. - Neither of my sisters are married.    And your question:Neither can be used alone without a noun or pronoun ,if the meaning is clear.Here neither is used instead of &amp;#39;neither of them &amp;#39; and as I said,in a formal style a singular verb is proper.</description></item><item><title>Re: Jest / jests</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/JestJests/2/lgmvb/Post.htm#953411</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:16:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:953411</guid><dc:creator>avangi</dc:creator><description>I&amp;#39;m saying that in this sentence the uncountable noun &amp;quot;jest&amp;quot; is singular, and therefore calls for a singular verb, &amp;quot;is.&amp;quot;   It&amp;#39;s like saying, &amp;quot;Your foolishness is wearing me down.&amp;quot;   Many nouns have both a countable and an uncountable use. You wouldn&amp;#39;t use a plural verb with the uncountable noun.   But with the countable use, of course it&amp;#39;s possible to have a count of &amp;quot;one.&amp;quot; In this case, the singular verb is appropriate.</description></item><item><title>Re: What the meaning, purpose, and value of education are/is?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhatMeaningPurposeValueEducation/ldpxd/post.htm#949550</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:21:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:949550</guid><dc:creator>avangi</dc:creator><description>Sometimes it helps to convert a question to a declarative sentence, as you try to figure out the tense of the verb.   Ask yourself what the subject of the clause is. Are there more than one? Is the subject singular or plural?   The tree is what color(s). The subject is &amp;quot;tree&amp;quot; (singular), not &amp;quot;colors&amp;quot; (plural); so it takes a singular verb,  is.     What colors are in the tree?  I know this is tricky. The tree is no longer the subject of the clause. &amp;quot;Tree&amp;quot; is object of the preposition, &amp;quot;in.&amp;quot; In this case, &amp;quot;colors&amp;quot; (plural) is the subject of the clause, so we need the plural verb. You can ask, &amp;quot;What colors are in the tree?&amp;quot; but you can&amp;#39;t ask, &amp;quot;What colors are the...</description></item><item><title>Compound</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Compound/lzxhq/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:26:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:947477</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>why compound subjects joined by or sometimes require a singular verb??</description></item><item><title>Re: Public</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Public/lvqrm/post.htm#943033</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:48:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:943033</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Pleasehelp: Many usage experts explain that &amp;quot;public&amp;quot; takes a singular verb in American 
 English; a plural verb in British English. You will also notice this with other words, such as &amp;quot;government.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Re: Tense help</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TenseHelp/lvlwh/post.htm#941732</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:16:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:941732</guid><dc:creator>pleasehelp</dc:creator><description>Why is have left unchanged? He, she, it is still requires the singular verb which is doesn&amp;#39;t.</description></item><item><title>Re: Plural or Singular</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PluralOrSingular/lvdrx/post.htm#939374</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:30:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:939374</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Clarencetsang: If you have decided that you wish to start your sentence with &amp;quot;My favorite food...,&amp;quot; you have two options: (1) You may follow the &amp;quot;rule&amp;quot; -- &amp;quot;food&amp;quot; is singular. So use the singular verb (My favorite food is bananas) . If you have a very strict teacher, you may want to follow this rule. (2) Most native speakers probably prefer to say &amp;quot;My favorite food are bananas.&amp;quot; They feel that it sounds more natural. It is certainly preferred in conversation. The word &amp;quot;bananas&amp;quot; causes them to think of &amp;quot;are&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;is.&amp;quot; It is, as always, your decision as to which sentence you wish to use.</description></item><item><title>Re: Nights</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Nights/lvrbp/post.htm#938466</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:14:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:938466</guid><dc:creator>yankee</dc:creator><description>I would expect the singular version to be more commonly used.  However, as Clive has already mentioned, both versions are used. And it is perfectly correct to use the singular verb. Clearly, &amp;quot;three to four nights&amp;quot; can be viewed as a single period of time . You could also make the period of time more specific and say this: &amp;quot;Is 4 nights enough for Vegas?&amp;quot;   Here is another example:   - Three days is much too long to go without sleep.    This sort of use of a singular verb with a plural subject also happens when people view a pair of things as a single unit rather than as separate, individual things. For example:   ~ Fish and chips is a culinary delight that Britain is famous for.     You&amp;#39;re welcome.</description></item><item><title>Re: Sentence fix</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceFix/2/lddpg/Post.htm#935335</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:07:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:935335</guid><dc:creator>avangi</dc:creator><description>Oversized bracelets, oversized earrings, oversizing of accessories, in general, is very popular now.   Why is it is and not are?  You can make a case for a plural verb, but no one would ever use it.  Three things  are   popular: bracelets, earrings, and oversizing. You have a compound subject comprising three nouns. In general, this would always call for a plural verb. The fact that two of them are plural and one is singular has nothing to do with it. The fact that two of them are physical objects and one is a practice has nothing to do with it. The problem is that the first two are very short, and the last one is much longer, by comparison  -  &amp;quot;oversizing of accessories, in general.&amp;quot; By the time you&amp;#39;ve digested this last...</description></item><item><title>Re: PS3 servers</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Ps3Servers/lcplx/post.htm#933153</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 06:07:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:933153</guid><dc:creator>pleasehelp</dc:creator><description>Sorry, I meant &amp;quot;confuse(r)&amp;quot;...  has is the singular verb and Wii is the singular subject etc..</description></item><item><title>Re: PS3 servers</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Ps3Servers/lcplx/post.htm#933120</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 05:36:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:933120</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>I believer that you are the confused one. The rule is simple: either singular subject &amp;amp; singular verb , or  plural subject &amp;amp; plural verb .</description></item><item><title>Re: Subject and verb agreement</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SubjectAndVerbAgreement/lrmvl/post.htm#922683</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:40:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:922683</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>The boy chooses. (singular subject; singular verb - with &amp;quot;s&amp;quot;) 
 The policeman chooses. 
 The cheerleader chooses. 
  
 The boys choose. (plural subject; plural verb - no &amp;quot;s&amp;quot;.) 
 The policemen choose. 
 The cheerleaders choose. 
  
 Exception for first person singular: I , You 
  
                     I choose. 
                     You choose.</description></item><item><title>Re: Has or have</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasOrHave/kqzjx/post.htm#916053</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:11:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:916053</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>Over xx percent of the pancreas has to be destroyed.   Your guideline is correct. The pancreas is a single organ and 'has' is a singular verb– a perfect example of your guideline.</description></item><item><title>Re: Singular verb</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SingularVerb/kqvvb/post.htm#915048</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:30:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:915048</guid><dc:creator>grammar geek</dc:creator><description>Try an online crossword puzzle dictionary. You can enter that information and see what pops up.</description></item><item><title>Singular verb</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SingularVerb/kqvvb/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:25:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:915043</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>what is a singular verb that starts with the letter S has 15 letters the 10th letter is a U?</description></item><item><title>Re: Plural or singular</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PluralOrSingular/kphkz/post.htm#911119</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:57:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:911119</guid><dc:creator>grammar geek</dc:creator><description>It takes a singular verb. Everyone is tired. Everybody has gone home.</description></item><item><title>Re: Grammar issues</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GrammarIssues/knmbd/post.htm#902587</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:42:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:902587</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>These words are always singular:  each, every, everybody, everyone, anybody, anyone, somebody, someone . Use the singular verb: was, is, has .</description></item><item><title>English Grammar exercise with answers</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EnglishGrammarExerciseAnswers/kjgmn/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:00:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:881378</guid><dc:creator>python740</dc:creator><description>Each of the following sentences may contain an error in grammar, idiom
or usage. If there is an error, it will appear in one of the underlined
portions. Answers are given at the answer part. First try to answer by
yourself, and then check it against the given answer. Answer
explanation for each sentence is also given. If you go through this
exercise, we can assure you that you will have a vast idea in English: 1. Neither of the two candidates who had applied for the job to the factory were eligible. 2. This chair has the same design, but it is different shaped from that one. 3. Because of the approaching cyclone, the wind began to blow hard and the sky became dark as evening. 4. The flag is risen in the morning and taken down at...</description></item><item><title>Subject verb agreement</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SubjectVerbAgreement/kwncz/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:28:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:878310</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hi, I understand the principle of using a plural verb for a compound subject but in the latter phrase of the ollowing sentence, it just seems to read better with a singular verb. Is it wrong?   Your father and I deeply appreciate your coming to the anniversary, as does Dr. Watson and, of course, all the children.    should it be , as do Dr. Watson, and, of course, all the children?</description></item><item><title>Re: Was or were</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WasOrWere/khrwk/post.htm#869752</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:25:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:869752</guid><dc:creator>dokterjokkebrok</dc:creator><description>In following paragraph,which I quoted from the book, &amp;quot;Principles of economics&amp;quot;, I think the verb in &amp;quot;that was the main&amp;quot; should be were not was.   Am I right?    The energy crisis of the 1970s, too, was blamed on nature&amp;#39;s supply of oil, but in fact it was the actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, combined with price controls, that was the main cause of the shortages.        Dear myid,   At first sight, it seems perfectly logical to write &amp;#39;it were&amp;#39; – after all, the word &amp;#39;actions&amp;#39; is indeed plural.  However, the personal pronoun &amp;#39;it&amp;#39;, in English, always takes a singular verb, also when a plural noun follows – which is the case here.  So, remember, always use a singular...</description></item><item><title>Re: "Information," or "Informations?"</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/InformationOrInformations/3/gzdmw/Post.htm#869686</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:47:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:869686</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Infromation= singular  Is= singular Informations=plural Are=plural    Subject Verb Agreement singular subject takes singular verb vice versa to plural verb and subject   The case of &amp;quot;All&amp;quot;   It depends if you how will you use it. All- as group takes singular verb   example: All informations in the news paper is here   All- as separate or parts should be on plural verb.   All informations from the students are here.   &amp;quot; a Lot&amp;quot;- is plural   There is no such word a lots ... its urban contraction of &amp;quot;lot and is&amp;quot; but it is not following the grammar rules..   I hope this entire infor mation will make sense to you ..</description></item><item><title>Re: Is or Are</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IsOrAre/kghdx/post.htm#866871</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:07:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:866871</guid><dc:creator>yoong liat</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;... each one of you is doing well.&amp;quot; (Since &amp;#39;each&amp;#39; precedes the verb, a singular verb is required.)</description></item><item><title>Usage of verb with or</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/UsageOfVerbWithOr/kvwch/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:33:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:857215</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>I&amp;#39;ve an issue regarding usage of verb with &amp;quot;or&amp;quot;. For example, in sentence 
 This phase involves translating design solutions into a facility or facilities that reflects the requirements in the output specification. 
   
 Should it be a plural verb (reflect) or singular verb (reflects)? 
 Please clarify. 
 Puneet Sharma</description></item><item><title>Re: Is this correct?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IsThisCorrect/kcxnx/post.htm#849337</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 04:24:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:849337</guid><dc:creator>tipsee1</dc:creator><description>Thank you so much Mr. Micawber.  Nontender is medical jargon and I have to use it verbatim. I was more worried about agreement of subject and verb wondering whether rest carried singular verbs.</description></item><item><title>Re: Pass</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Pass/kblrz/post.htm#843434</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:37:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:843434</guid><dc:creator>grammar geek</dc:creator><description>It&amp;#39;s actually quite common to use the singular verb with a block of time (as it is with a sum of money or a distance). 
  
 Ten minutes isn&amp;#39;t a long time. Three miles is too far to walk in this heat. One hundred dollars was a fair bargain. 
  
 It&amp;#39;s hard to say if it&amp;#39;s right in your situation.</description></item><item><title>Re: Pluarality of developmentalism?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PluaralityDevelopmentalism/jqphj/post.htm#835240</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:06:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:835240</guid><dc:creator>zazzex</dc:creator><description>Then, shouldn&amp;#39;t we say 
  
 &amp;quot;There are old developmentalism and new developmentalism &amp;quot; 
   
 , as we say &amp;quot;There are thinking and visioning in activities.&amp;quot; 
  
  
 Or, are you suggesting only for &amp;quot;There is&amp;quot; clause we should use a singular verb?</description></item><item><title>Re: I can't even think....help</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ICantEvenThinkHelp/jqjvl/post.htm#833056</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:45:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:833056</guid><dc:creator>cool breeze</dc:creator><description>Each and one require a singular verb, which means that 1. and 2. are wrong. All can take a singula r or plural verb:   All is well that ends well.  All are present.   CB</description></item><item><title>Singular/Plural</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SingularPlural/jxmpl/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:22:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:824205</guid><dc:creator>umaa.spk</dc:creator><description>every thirty-two pupils now HAS one microcomputer.   Do we need to use singular verb since it uses EVERY?   Please let me know.</description></item><item><title>Re: Afraid of a cockroach or afraid cockroaches</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfraidCockroachAfraidCockroaches/2/jxkwn/Post.htm#823735</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:07:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:823735</guid><dc:creator>mrpernickety</dc:creator><description>Here is some food for thought. When each of the following example used singular verb, does it mean &amp;quot;one insect&amp;quot;, or as I said, a collective species?:   
 
 
  
 In all the examples you have quoted, each mention of &amp;quot;roaches&amp;quot; is regarded as a reference to a species, rather than to one insect, of course. That is why the definite article precedes the word &amp;quot;roach&amp;quot;. 
 On the whole, these articles drive me nuts and I have not been able to aquire a good grasp of them (and as God is my witness I&amp;#39;m trying), but I think in the examples above, the definite article is crucial - failing the definite article, the sentences would sound off key. 
 That is of course just my take on this, some might present their...</description></item><item><title>Re: Afraid of a cockroach or afraid cockroaches</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfraidCockroachAfraidCockroaches/2/jxkwn/Post.htm#823710</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:48:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:823710</guid><dc:creator>goodman</dc:creator><description>As I am the lone defender on the debate of singularity use, I need to be absolutely convinced with logic and reason. Wihtout questions, These examples are seriously debated and to me, each was based on individual interpretation. as I mentioned earlier, every context can be altered or written to form an agreement with plurality or singularity. I agree however, some do sound better in plural than singular. But not all. I know my view may be as pupular as the topic creature we have discussed. But I like to proof my point about insect and animal species when it comes to detrermining plurality or singulaity. 
 Here is some food for thought. When each of the following example used singular verb, does it mean &amp;quot;one insect&amp;quot;, or as I...</description></item><item><title>One person or a group of people</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/OnePersonOrAGroupOfPeople/jxkgb/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:13:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:823464</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hi. What is written in Malachi 1:14 of the Bible, New International Version, is this. 
  
 14 &amp;quot;Cursed is the cheat who has an acceptable male in his flock and vows to give it, but then sacrifices a blemished animal to the Lord. For I am a great king,&amp;quot; says the LORD Almighty, &amp;quot;and my name is to be feared among the nations. 
  
 I think the phrase &amp;quot;the cheat&amp;quot; is referring to one person and that is why it is followed by the singular verb &amp;quot;is.&amp;quot; Then again, I think we usually refer to a group of people by attaching the definite article before what I think is an adjective? 
  
 eg, 
 the needy</description></item><item><title>Subject-Verb agreement</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SubjectVerbAgreement/jnwgj/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:47:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:817981</guid><dc:creator>horizon981</dc:creator><description>I read that in order to find the subject of a sentence, search for a verb and then decide &amp;quot;who&amp;quot; performed that action.   So, in &amp;quot;According to scientists, a cat lives long.&amp;quot;, the subject is &amp;quot;cat&amp;quot; and hence we use a singular verb. Is this right?   If so, help me out in the following sentence:   This type of questions (is/are) quite common.   The only verb I find here is the verb (helping verb?) &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;. But what is the subject: &amp;quot;questions&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;type&amp;quot;? Why?</description></item><item><title>Re: All discrete and all all together?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AllDiscreteTogether/jmpzc/post.htm#817807</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:18:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:817807</guid><dc:creator>clive</dc:creator><description>Hi again, 
  
 Let me offer and discuss a few examples that are very simple and concrete. 
  
 Tom bought a table, a chair and a stool . He bought three things. 
  
 Tom bought a table, a chair or a stool. He bought one thing. 
  
 Tom bought a table and a chair or a stool. This is confusing. I don&amp;#39;t know for sure how many things he bought. 
   
 Tom bought a table, a chair and a stool that is red . Tom&amp;#39;s stool is red. I know because of the singular verb. 
  
 Tom bought a table, a chair and a stool that are red . Tom&amp;#39;s three things are all red. I know because of the plural verb. 
  
 Your question was a little unclear to me. I hope I have answered it. If not, please post again. 
  
 Best wishes, Clive</description></item><item><title>Re: About singular verb</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AboutSingularVerb/jwxpc/post.htm#816911</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:52:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:816911</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>http://www.eslus.com/LESSONS/GRAMMAR/POS/pos3.htm http://www.towson.edu/ows/sub-verb.htm   These two sites explain very well.</description></item><item><title>Re: Was vs were</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WasVsWere/jkzcc/post.htm#802320</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:02:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:802320</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>Noun phrases with every take a singular verb, strange as that may seem to you.    CJ</description></item><item><title>Re: None of is/are able vs. none of us was/were able</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/NoneAbleNoneAble/4/dvvgr/Post.htm#801116</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:16:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:801116</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>why is &amp;quot;two of us IS here&amp;quot; correct? It is not correct.   There seems to be a lot of confusion surrounding the side chat that Marius and I had earlier in this thread. The confusion is due to a misinterpretation of a few joking remarks that we made. ___________   The facts are as follows:   In English grammar it is well known that a singular subject ( one person or thing) takes a singular verb ( is, was , etc.).  One child was sick with the flu. One of the children was sick with the flu.   A plural subject ( more than one person or thing) takes a plural verb.  Two of the children were sick with the flu.    In formal writing, none is considered a singular subject.  None of the children was sick with the flu.  ___________   Now to...</description></item><item><title>Re: Usage of "its numbers"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/UsageOfItsNumbers/jjlrh/post.htm#799184</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:12:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:799184</guid><dc:creator>fandorin</dc:creator><description>(numbers) a large quantity or amount, often in contrast to a smaller one; numerical preponderance.   The weight of numbers turned the battle against them .   You use  number  with words such as `large&amp;#39; or `small&amp;#39; to say approximately how many things or people there are (can be both plural and singualar).   Growing numbers  of people in the rural areas are too frightened to vote.   A considerable amount or quantity; many; A large quantity; a multitude:  Numbers flocked to the city to see the parade.   http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/number   The construction the number of + plural noun is used with a singular verb (as in the number of people affected remains small) . Thus it is the noun number rather than the noun people...</description></item><item><title>Re: A group of animals is or a group of animals are</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AGroupAnimalsGroupAnimals-Are/jwpbk/post.htm#796257</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:28:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:796257</guid><dc:creator>yoong liat</dc:creator><description>American or British, &amp;quot;a group&amp;quot; of anything is always singular in my book.   collective noun ( grammar ) a singular noun, such as &amp;#39;committee&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;team, that refers to a group of animals, people or things, and, in BrE, can be used with either a singular or plural verb. In AmE it must be used with a singular verb.   (Oxford Advanced Learner&amp;#39;s Dictionary)</description></item><item><title>Re: About singular verb</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AboutSingularVerb/jwxpc/post.htm#795321</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:05:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:795321</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>Your question is too general. All we can do in such cases is give very general advice, such as &amp;quot;Study the verbs more, and be more careful with number agreement in sentences&amp;quot;.   If you have specific questions about specific sentences, please include them in your next post.   CJ</description></item><item><title>Re: About singular verb</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AboutSingularVerb/jwxpc/post.htm#795318</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:795318</guid><dc:creator>yankee</dc:creator><description>Hi Anon   You will have to try to be a little more specific. Do you mean that you have trouble with things like the following?    I have You have He/she/it has   I run You run He/she/it runs</description></item><item><title>About singular verb</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AboutSingularVerb/jwxpc/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:47:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:795296</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>i am facing some problem use of singular verb.so tell me how can i manage this problem.</description></item><item><title>Neither of you have(has) done anything</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/NeitherDoneAnything/jwjkg/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:45:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:793770</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>I read in :   
A practical English Grammar  page 67     Neither of them knows the way,do they?     they say after niether of , we use singular verb  so, which is correct:      Neither of you have done anything    or   Neither of you has done anything</description></item></channel></rss>