<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Stative verbs' matching tag 'Stative verbs'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aStative+verbs&amp;tag=Stative+verbs&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Stative verbs' matching tag 'Stative verbs'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3191.21962)</generator><item><title>Re: "I've been knowing him for years"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IveBeenKnowingHimForYears/5/gpcwn/Post.htm#575548</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:42:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:575548</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>2nona the brit:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It may not be &amp;quot;standard English&amp;quot;. It may be smart one. We do not discuss the obedience&amp;nbsp;to the rule. It&amp;#39;s duteous and overwhelming. We discuss the reasons for the rule to exist.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By the way, this rule which prevents the stative verbs from being used in Perfect Continuous is not the only and perhaps not the last attack on this tense which is wanted to be eradicated from the language by many.</description></item><item><title>Re: until now+ present perfect</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/UntilNowPresentPerfect/gpbrj/post.htm#575119</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:49:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:575119</guid><dc:creator>richard_s</dc:creator><description>This is pretty much correct. The second sentence is definitely fine. Actually, the &amp;#39;until now&amp;#39; is redundant in the first sentence. Â Also, it might be more natural to use the perfect continuous in this sentence. Â Perfect continuous is used to show that an actionÂ continues until now, except with stative verbs and reporting verbs (such as &amp;#39;consider&amp;#39; which was used in the original sentence). Â The present perfect usually has this meaning when it is combined with a time reference given by &amp;#39;since&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;for&amp;#39;, but otherwise indicates a relationship between a past event and a present event.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;(I hope that&amp;#39;s not too confusing!)&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: STATIVE VERB</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/StativeVerb/gprjv/post.htm#574978</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:35:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:574978</guid><dc:creator>Goodman</dc:creator><description>&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;nbsp;think it is right to say most stative verbs like &amp;quot;feel&amp;quot; can not be used in progressive&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No, this is a misconception. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He &lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;isn&amp;#39;t feeling&lt;/span&gt; well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#ff00ff;"&gt;Is the word &amp;quot;feeling&amp;quot; an adjective? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No, [felling] is still a verb in present progressive form. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i&lt;span style="COLOR:#00bf00;"&gt;.e. how are you felling with you flu? &lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;I am still not feeling too&lt;/strong&gt; well&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description></item><item><title>STATIVE VERB</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/StativeVerb/gprhp/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:38:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:574955</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;I think it is right to say most stative verbs like &amp;quot;feel&amp;quot; can not be used in progressive. Does that mean when most of them that can&amp;#39;t be used in progressive tenses&amp;nbsp;are used progressively, they are to be considered an adjective?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He &lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;isn&amp;#39;t feeling&lt;/span&gt; well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is the word &amp;quot;feeling&amp;quot; an adjective?</description></item><item><title>Re: Stative verb: part of progressive or an adjective?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/StativeVerbPartProgressive-Adjective/gxqlk/post.htm#574729</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 08:13:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:574729</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Anonymous&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;some stative verbs can take on progressive verb forms, whereas most of them don&amp;#39;t.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; Hmmm.&amp;nbsp; Most of them?&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m not sure that part is true.&amp;nbsp; It may be.&amp;nbsp; Some verbs have both stative and dynamic uses / meanings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;He is feeling good.&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp; =&amp;nbsp; He feels good.&amp;nbsp; This stative verb can be used in the progressive tense.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;He is tasting the pie.&lt;/i&gt; =&amp;nbsp; He is taking a taste of the pie.&amp;nbsp; Not a stative use of &lt;i&gt;taste&lt;/i&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Progressive tense.&amp;nbsp; (Can also be used as a non-progressive stative when it means &lt;i&gt;has a (certain) taste&lt;/i&gt;:&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;The pie tastes too sweet.&lt;/i&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;He is thinking about the test result.&lt;/i&gt; = He is actively pondering the result of the test.&amp;nbsp; Not a stative use of &lt;i&gt;think&lt;/i&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Progressive tense.&amp;nbsp; (Can also be used as a non-progressive stative when it means &lt;i&gt;believe&lt;/i&gt;:&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;He thinks the test was fair.&lt;/i&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;None of the &lt;i&gt;-ing&lt;/i&gt; words above (&lt;i&gt;feeling, tasting, thinking&lt;/i&gt;) can be considered adjectives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CJ&amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Re: Stative verb: part of progressive or an adjective?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/StativeVerbPartProgressive-Adjective/gxqjk/post.htm#574695</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 05:53:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:574695</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><description>.&lt;br /&gt;He is playing tennis. -- I think the word &amp;#39;play&amp;#39; is active, thus allows for the use of progressive.-&lt;strong&gt;- YES&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He is feeling good/humble. -- Here, I think the word &amp;#39;feel&amp;#39; is stative, where the word &amp;#39;feel&amp;#39; could be used in an active sense too.&lt;br /&gt;Does the word &amp;#39;feeling&amp;#39; an adjective here??-- &lt;strong&gt;Not an adjective; it is &amp;#39;feel&amp;#39; in the present progressive.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He is tasting the pie. -- Here the stative verb &amp;#39;taste&amp;#39; seems to be used in progressive tense. Does that mean it is a part of a progressive tense like &amp;quot;He is playing tennis&amp;quot;?--&lt;strong&gt; YES, it is an active verb here.&amp;nbsp; = &amp;#39;He is sampling the pie&amp;#39;.&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt; Cf:&amp;nbsp; &amp;#39;the pie tastes good&amp;#39; (= the pie has a good flavor)&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He is thinking about the test result. -- Here, I think the word &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; is stative. Does that mean the word &amp;quot;thinking&amp;quot; in the sentence is acting as an adjective? &lt;strong&gt;NOT an adjective; it is &amp;#39;think&amp;#39; in the present progressive.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;MANY stative verbs can take on progressive verb forms&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;.</description></item><item><title>Re: "than" as a conjunction</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ThanAsAConjunction/gxqjg/post.htm#574691</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 05:44:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:574691</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hi, Thank you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have some questions on this though:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font color="#0000bf"&gt;1. She has &lt;/font&gt;&lt;span&gt;more money&lt;/span&gt; than her husband/her husband does/her husband has. -- &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think all three can be used &lt;span style="COLOR:#111111;"&gt;Yes &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;but wonder why this one can have &amp;#39;her husband does&amp;#39; as a viable option, whereas the other two don&amp;#39;t seem to have that option. &lt;span style="COLOR:#111111;"&gt;They do, ie you can say &amp;#39;than her husband does&amp;#39; in #2 and #3. I think you meant to refer here to&lt;span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;#39;her husband&lt;strike&gt; does&lt;/strike&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;has&amp;#39;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;#39;&lt;/span&gt;Has&amp;#39; is OK here, because it is the main verb, as in &amp;#39;She has more money&amp;#39;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think we can have the pattern &amp;quot;She has more money than her husband does&amp;quot; because what is implied possibly is &amp;quot;She does have more money than her husband does,&amp;quot; and I think it is OK to assume a possbility of the auxiliary verb &amp;quot;does&amp;quot;? being there.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Likewise, could we think in a similar or the same line for these? As long as we can fit the auxiliary verb (is this auxiliary anyway?), then, the structure &amp;quot;... more than he/she does&amp;quot; is possible?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think these are stative verbs:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;consider&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;She (does consider) considers it more suitable than her husband/her&amp;nbsp;husband does&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;like:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; She (does like) likes this food more than her husband/her husband does.&lt;br /&gt;feel:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; She (does feel) feels her cousin&amp;nbsp;is nicer than than her husband/hur husband does.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, my overall argument is that if you can fit the auxiliary verb &amp;quot;does&amp;quot; in the main (first) verb part, then you can use &amp;quot;does&amp;quot; in an appropriate place after the conjunction &amp;quot;than&amp;quot;; and only exception is when you have a &amp;quot;be&amp;quot; verb in the main part of the sentence like this:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Not good:&amp;nbsp; She &lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;is&lt;/span&gt; feeling better than her husband does.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description></item><item><title>Stative verb: part of progressive or an adjective?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/StativeVerbPartProgressiveAdjective/gxqzx/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 01:07:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:574631</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think it is correct to say that some stative verbs can take on progressive verb forms, whereas most of them don&amp;#39;t.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He is playing tennis. -- I think the word &amp;#39;play&amp;#39; is active, thus allows for the use of progrssive.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He is feeling good/humble. -- Here, I think the word &amp;#39;feel&amp;#39; is stative, where the word &amp;#39;feel&amp;#39; could be used in an active sense too.&lt;br /&gt;Does the word &amp;#39;feeling&amp;#39; an adjective here??&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He is tasting the pie. -- Here the stative verb &amp;#39;taste&amp;#39; seems to be used in progressive tense. Does that mean it is a part of a progressive tense like &amp;quot;He is playing tennis&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He is thinking about the test result. -- Here, I think the word &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; is stative. Does that mean the word &amp;quot;thinking&amp;quot; in the sentence is acting as an adjective?&amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>past perfect or past perfect continuous</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PastPerfectPastPerfectContinuous/gxpdc/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:41:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:574296</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Is this a past perfect tense or a past perfect continous tense?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;They went back to ***, where they &lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;had been committed&lt;/span&gt; to the grace of God for the work they ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;One more thing: Does the term &amp;quot;progressive tense&amp;quot; mean the same as &amp;quot;continous tense&amp;quot;. I think lt is stated that a stative verb cannot be used with progressive tenses.&amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Re: "I've been knowing him for years"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IveBeenKnowingHimForYears/5/gxnvq/Post.htm#573749</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:29:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:573749</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Goodman:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;font&gt;&lt;span&gt;I didnât not change the content of your post&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No, you did. You said that I had said &amp;quot;I stopped know it&amp;quot;. I&amp;#39;ve never written so. I wrote &amp;quot;I stopped know&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;ing&lt;/span&gt; it&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="BACKGROUND-COLOR:#80c0ff;"&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#ff409f;"&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#111111;"&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:black;"&gt;&lt;font&gt;If &lt;span style="COLOR:#60bf00;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#111111;"&gt;you say âI forgot I have a&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#60bf00;"&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:black;"&gt;&lt;font&gt;10 oâclock&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:black;"&gt;&lt;font&gt; meetingâ Can you equate this to âI donât know I have a meeting at &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:black;"&gt;&lt;font&gt;10 oâclock&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:black;"&gt;&lt;font&gt; ? No! &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;You are right, I can&amp;#39;t equate this. But I surely can equate &amp;quot;I forgot the password&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;I don&amp;#39;t know the password&amp;quot;. I can agree with you that &amp;quot;to know&amp;quot; IS NOT ALWAYS durative. But you should agree that IT CAN BE durative, hence yo should permit using it with Perfect Progressive in particular cases. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Again, the problem arose when someone spread the impossibility to use the stative verbs in Progressive Tense (with which I completely agree) onto another Progressive Tense (Perfect), with which I disagree. We can&amp;#39;t use them in PROGRESSIVE TENSE, not in PROGRESSIVE TENSE&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;S&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;. Despite having similar names, those two tenses are very different.</description></item></channel></rss>