If it's simple past, you don't need to use "have" in front of the simple past tense. "I shouldn't ate it." "I shouldn't have eaten it." is correct.

I shouldn't have ate it. Or I shouldn't have eaten it. What's the difference? The second sentence is present perfect so is the first sentence simple past tense?

what W hat is the difference between present tense and present perfect tense? Let me illustrate with the verb work . Present. I, you, we, they work he, she, it, who? works Present perfect. I, you, we, they have worked he, she, it, who?

If your answer was "yes" to the above question, you will go to step 2. This is possible, but as an instruction the imperative would normally be used. If your answer was "yes", go to step 2. If you would, I will be happy. This

Could drunk be the past tense of drink? No. drank is the past tense. CJ

Could drunk be the past tense of drink?

The past tense of "split" is "split," not "splitted."

Hi, Can I apply or in below sentence? The Pakistani air raid make heavy loss in Taliban side or around 50 Taliban have been killed.

She's had to do a lot of work. = She has had to do a lot of work. "She has has to do a lot of work" doesn't make sense. It's Present Perfect tense here, which means you need the construction "to have + past participle". More examples: I have

Hi, Please correct mistakes if you see any : "No big surprise that they are often out of the country and I am home alone. Not totally alone actually, we have a lot of pets. This is informal writing. " I was born in France