<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Verbs tag:Prepositions' matching tags 'Verbs' and 'Prepositions'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aVerbs+tag%3aPrepositions&amp;tag=Verbs,Prepositions&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Verbs tag:Prepositions' matching tags 'Verbs' and 'Prepositions'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3125.9045)</generator><item><title>Re: Appositive, direct object, indirect, predicate nominative, object of prepos</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AppositiveDirectObjectIndirect-PredicateNominativeObjectPrep/gjrzr/post.htm#545428</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:45:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:545428</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;Scurvy&lt;/em&gt;, a vitamin C deficiency, makes &lt;em&gt;people&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;weak&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;sore&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Scurvy&lt;/em&gt; is the subject, because it is the thing which&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;makes people weak and sore.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;People&lt;/em&gt; is the direct object, because it is what scurvy is affecting, direct objects usually follow verbs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Weak&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;sore&lt;/em&gt; are objective complements, because they modify the direct object, &lt;em&gt;people&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Scurvy was the leading &lt;em&gt;cause&lt;/em&gt; of death among &lt;em&gt;sailors&lt;/em&gt; in the early eighteen century.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Cause&lt;/em&gt; is the predicate nominative, because it stands for the subject, scurvy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sailors&lt;/em&gt; is the object of a preposition, because it follows the preposition among, and acts as the subject of the prepositional phrase.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;In 1753, James Lind, a Scottish naval &lt;em&gt;surgeon&lt;/em&gt;, showed that citrus could cure scurvy.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Surgeon&lt;/em&gt; is an appositive for James Lind, because it describes him further, but is not essential to the sentence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;When the British &lt;em&gt;navy&lt;/em&gt; gave &lt;em&gt;sailors&lt;/em&gt; fresh citrus &lt;em&gt;juice&lt;/em&gt;, scurvy disappeared from their ships.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Navy&lt;/em&gt; is the subject, because it is the thing which &lt;em&gt;gave&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sailors &lt;/em&gt;is an indirect object, because they are the people to whom the juice was given.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Juice&lt;/em&gt; is the direct object, because it is the thing which was given.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Today, scurvy is rare; it is usually seen only in very old or very young patients whose diets are deficient in &lt;em&gt;vitamin C&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Vitamin C&lt;/em&gt; is an object of a preposition because it is the subject of the prepositional phrase, &amp;quot;in vitamin C.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When trying to&amp;nbsp;diagram a sentence I think it becomes easier when you take out the unnecessary words. For example change &amp;quot;scurvy was the leading &lt;em&gt;cause&lt;/em&gt; of death among &lt;em&gt;sailors&lt;/em&gt; in the early eighteen century,&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;scurvy was the cause of death among sailors in century.&amp;quot; The latter is less senseful, but makes it easier to diagram the sentence&amp;#39;s nouns. Of course that method wouldn&amp;#39;t work as well when you&amp;#39;re asked to diagram words other than nouns. &lt;br /&gt;I hope this made some sense, and helped!&lt;br /&gt;-Nathan</description></item><item><title>Re: Appositive, direct object, indirect, predicate nominative, object of prepos</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AppositiveDirectObjectIndirect-PredicateNominativeObjectPrep/gjrcl/post.htm#545388</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:09:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:545388</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;Scurvy&lt;/em&gt;, a vitamin C deficiency, makes &lt;em&gt;people&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;weak&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;sore&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Scurvy&lt;/em&gt; is the subject, because it is the thing which&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;makes people weak and sore.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;People&lt;/em&gt; is the direct object, because it is what scurvy is affecting, direct objects usually follow verbs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Weak&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;sore&lt;/em&gt; are objective complements, because they modify the direct object, &lt;em&gt;people&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Scurvy was the leading &lt;em&gt;cause&lt;/em&gt; of death among &lt;em&gt;sailors&lt;/em&gt; in the early eighteen century.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Cause&lt;/em&gt; is the predicate nominative, because it stands for the subject, scurvy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sailors&lt;/em&gt; is the object of a preposition, because it follows the preposition among, and acts as the subject of the prepositional phrase.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;In 1753, James Lind, a Scottish naval &lt;em&gt;surgeon&lt;/em&gt;, showed that citrus could cure scurvy.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Surgeon&lt;/em&gt; is an appositive for James Lind, because it describes him further, but is not essential to the sentence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;When the British &lt;em&gt;navy&lt;/em&gt; gave &lt;em&gt;sailors&lt;/em&gt; fresh citrus &lt;em&gt;juice&lt;/em&gt;, scurvy disappeared from their ships.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Navy&lt;/em&gt; is the subject, because it is the thing which &lt;em&gt;gave&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sailors &lt;/em&gt;is an indirect object, because they are the people to whom the juice was given.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Juice&lt;/em&gt; is the direct object, because it is the thing which was given.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Today, scurvy is rare; it is usually seen only in very old or very young patients whose diets are deficient in &lt;em&gt;vitamin C&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Vitamin C&lt;/em&gt; is an object of a preposition because it is the subject of the prepositional phrase, &amp;quot;in vitamin C.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When trying to&amp;nbsp;diagram a sentence I think it becomes easier when you take out the unnecessary words. For example change &amp;quot;scurvy was the leading &lt;em&gt;cause&lt;/em&gt; of death among &lt;em&gt;sailors&lt;/em&gt; in the early eighteen century,&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;scurvy was the cause of death among sailors in century.&amp;quot; The latter is less senseful, but makes it easier to diagram the sentence&amp;#39;s nouns. Of course that method wouldn&amp;#39;t work as well when you&amp;#39;re asked to diagram words other than nouns. &lt;br /&gt;I hope this made some sense, and helped!&lt;br /&gt;-Nathan</description></item><item><title>Re: to which</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ToWhich/gjrrk/post.htm#545353</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:01:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:545353</guid><dc:creator>Cool Breeze</dc:creator><description>&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;&lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;To&lt;/font&gt; &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;which&lt;/font&gt;, &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;in&lt;/font&gt; &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;which&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/i&gt; etc.consist of a &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;preposition&lt;/font&gt; and a &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;relative pronoun&lt;/font&gt;. The preposition is usually determined by a verb, noun or adjective. In informal style the preposition is often placed at the end of the relative clause. Examples:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;This is the house &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;in&lt;/font&gt; &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;which&lt;/font&gt; he lives. This is the house [&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;which/that&lt;/font&gt;] he lives &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;in&lt;/font&gt;.&lt;/i&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The preposition is &lt;i&gt;in&lt;/i&gt; because that preposition is used with house in this context and meaning: &lt;i&gt;He lives &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;in&lt;/font&gt; this house.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;I bought the book &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;about&lt;/font&gt; &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;which&lt;/font&gt; you told me yesterday. I bought the book [&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;which/that&lt;/font&gt;] you told me&lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt; about&lt;/font&gt; yesterday.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The preposition is &lt;i&gt;about&lt;/i&gt; because that preposition is used when we &lt;i&gt;tell&lt;/i&gt; somebody &lt;i&gt;about&lt;/i&gt; something: &lt;i&gt;He told me&lt;/i&gt;&lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt; &lt;/font&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;about&lt;/font&gt; his problems.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Where&lt;/i&gt; is sometimes possible instead of &lt;i&gt;to which&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;in which&lt;/i&gt;, especially when the intended meaning is that the &lt;u&gt;place&lt;/u&gt; of something is mentioned:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Take this kettle to the kitchen where it belongs.&lt;/i&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But: &lt;i&gt;Ages ago, this island was occupied by Great Britain, &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;to &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;which&lt;/font&gt; it belongs even now / &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;which&lt;/font&gt; it belongs &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;to&lt;/font&gt; even now.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Note that there is a comma in the last sentence. A comma is needed for a certain type of relative clauses. Use the Search box to find out more about them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CB &lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Numbers</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Numbers/gwmcj/post.htm#543941</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:39:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:543941</guid><dc:creator>Liveinjapan</dc:creator><description>Thanks, 26.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Got it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think &amp;#39;troop cuts&amp;#39; also possible. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;New2, do you mean why the transitive &lt;i&gt;cut &lt;/i&gt;needs the preposition &lt;i&gt;down&lt;/i&gt;? I think &lt;i&gt;down &lt;/i&gt;could be an adverb and &lt;i&gt;cut down&lt;/i&gt; is a commonly used phrazal verb. Anyways I can&amp;#39;t answer it properly. </description></item><item><title>Re: adj &amp; verbs with prepositions - pronunciation</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/VerbsPrepositionsPronunciation/gwzzd/post.htm#541963</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:43:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:541963</guid><dc:creator>Kooyeen</dc:creator><description>&lt;br /&gt;Here&amp;#39;s a gift for you. &amp;lt;-- FOR is not stressed, and so it&amp;#39;ll be replaced by a weak form, which will sound like FUR.&lt;br /&gt;What are you waiting for? &amp;lt;-- Exception: this FOR is nor stressed completely, but you could say it has a secondary stress, and so it&amp;#39;s not reduced. This happens when you have prepositions or words that might take the weak form at the end of a statement. Another example like this: Give it to me (&amp;quot;to&amp;quot; is weak) - I don&amp;#39;t want to (&amp;quot;to&amp;quot; is not weak).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.englishforums.com/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" alt="Smile" title="Smile" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: adj &amp; verbs with prepositions - pronunciation</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/VerbsPrepositionsPronunciation/gwzvc/post.htm#541945</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:11:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:541945</guid><dc:creator>sumryan</dc:creator><description>Adjectives and verbs are considered &amp;#39;content words&amp;#39; so they are usually stressed. Prepositions are considered &amp;#39;function or structure words&amp;#39; so they are usually unstressed. &lt;br /&gt;Of course, as explained by the author above, this all depends on the context.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here is a link to a sentence stress lesson &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.englishclub.com/pronunciation/sentence-stress.htm"&gt;http://www.englishclub.com/pronunciation/sentence-stress.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Susan&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="color:#0000ff;"&gt;&amp;lt;link removed by a mod.&amp;gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: near/nearby</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/NearNearby/gwvqv/post.htm#541862</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:44:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:541862</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><description>I think of &amp;quot;nearby&amp;quot; as an adverb and &amp;quot;near&amp;quot; as a preposition.&amp;nbsp; (Both can be adjectives:&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;She lives in a nearby neighborhood.&amp;nbsp; The Dow will continue to lose money in the near term&lt;/em&gt;.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I would say, &amp;quot;I live close &lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;by / to&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;the city center, and my friend lives nearby.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;d be inclined to view your number 2 as incorrect, but I could be wrong.&amp;nbsp; &lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;Number one is fine.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Edit.&amp;nbsp; My dictionary allows &amp;quot;near&amp;quot; as an adverb, in &amp;quot;Please come near the fire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There seem to be several ways to look at it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp; - A.</description></item><item><title>Re: adj &amp; verbs with prepositions - pronunciation</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/VerbsPrepositionsPronunciation/gwdqm/post.htm#541581</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:08:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:541581</guid><dc:creator>Mr Wordy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In speech, prepositions are usually unstressed. They would be unstressed, for example, in &amp;quot;I&amp;#39;d like to apply for a loan&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;I&amp;#39;m so proud of you&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They can be stressed when a contrast is being made, or there is some other reason for emphasis: &amp;quot;I told you to put the food &lt;em&gt;in&lt;/em&gt; the freezer&amp;quot; (not, say, on top of it); &amp;quot;Finished my bath? I&amp;#39;m not even &lt;em&gt;in&lt;/em&gt; it yet!&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;Stop talking &lt;em&gt;over&lt;/em&gt; me!&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>adj &amp; verbs with prepositions - pronunciation</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/VerbsPrepositionsPronunciation/gwdpv/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:54:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:541556</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hi &lt;br /&gt;I have a question.. when we have an adjective or verb with preposition eg. apply for, pround of..where does the stress is? which are weak forms or sounds?</description></item><item><title>Re: gaining sovereignty</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GainingSovereignty/ghqzj/post.htm#540235</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:16:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:540235</guid><dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;My instinct is that it&amp;#39;s because the verb is followed by one or more prepositions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;I have never and will never cook dinner&lt;/span&gt; doesn&amp;#39;t sound terrible to me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Clive</description></item></channel></rss>