<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Video tag:Speaking' matching tags 'Video' and 'Speaking'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aVideo+tag%3aSpeaking</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Video tag:Speaking' matching tags 'Video' and 'Speaking'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>XMOD (Build: 3616.28671)</generator><item><title>Re: film noir scene</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FilmNoirScene/lvmrc/post.htm#941872</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 05:41:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:941872</guid><dc:creator>steven j. weller</dc:creator><description>Speaking of film noir, here&amp;#39;s a classic scene. In this scene, good girl Ella Raines has gone undercover to seduce ... her boy friend condemned to death in Phantom Lady. No words spoken but you sure get the idea.  That&amp;#39;s a weird scene. Elisha Cook Jr.&amp;#39;s a generally weird guy, but this scene is just... odd. Interesting bit of character, pretty well establishes she&amp;#39;s not sincere in her efforts but committed to seeing them through, and he seems pretty thoroughly hopped up on something, but... I&amp;#39;m not sure how you&amp;#39;d even write a scene like that. Life Continues, Despite Evidence to the Contrary Steven</description></item><item><title>Film noir scene</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FilmNoirScene/lvmrc/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:58:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:941853</guid><dc:creator>nmstevens</dc:creator><description>Speaking of film noir, here&amp;#39;s a classic scene. In this scene, good girl Ella Raines has gone undercover to seduce hep cat drummer Elisha Cooke Jr. in order to find out information that might save her boy friend condemned to death in Phantom Lady. No words spoken but you sure get the idea.  NMS</description></item><item /><item><title>Re: How to pass the TOEFL test ?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HowToPassTheToeflTest/jhnjz/post.htm#872306</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:35:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:872306</guid><dc:creator>lucas777</dc:creator><description>I just saw this video on youtube. Teacher Steve Ford gave a lot of info. in the TOEFL speaking and I think it also helps for IELTS students. He seems very patient teacher for a test like the TOEFL!</description></item><item><title>Kuroda's Head...</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/KurodasHead/ldldg/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:54:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:936706</guid><dc:creator>steven j. weller</dc:creator><description>I&amp;#39;m not much of a baseball fan - nothing against it, just not much of a fan - but every local news channel is running the footage of Kuroda taking a line drive to the HEAD, pretty much on a continuous loop. How is it possible this guy isn&amp;#39;t dead? They&amp;#39;re talking about putting him back into the rotation around THURSDAY!  Life Continues, Despite Evidence to the Contrary Steven</description></item><item /><item><title>Re: Pronunciation proper names</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PronunciationProperNames/jxgcd/post.htm#825216</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:16:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:825216</guid><dc:creator>dokterjokkebrok</dc:creator><description>If you&amp;#39;re referring to the professor Chinua Achebe, I found out that you should pronounce his name as follows    
 /&amp;#39; ʧɪnuɑː əʧə&amp;#39;beɪ/   
  (or if you&amp;#39;re not familiar with phonetic script)  tsjin-u-ahh-tsjuh-bay   Source: YouTube -- at 0:25 his name is uttered. Hopefully this was helpful.  Regards Jordy</description></item><item><title>Can you tell one's social background by the accent (in the UK)?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CanTellOnesSocialBackgroundAccent/jlbgp/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:27:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:806138</guid><dc:creator>bonjour_rosemary</dc:creator><description>Hello, yesterday my friends and I had a rather interesting chat concerning the issue of accents in the UK. We all know that there are many different accents in the UK. I can recognise some local accents, such as Liverpool and Yorkshire. I understand that accents vary from geographical areas to generations. People can tell that someone is well-educated by the way one speaks (terminology). Yet, much more than that, it seems to me that most British can instantly tell someone&amp;#39;s social background when they hear s/he speaks. Why is that? One time I met two people who have different accents, but my friend said they both went to public schools (well I&amp;#39;m aware that going to public schools doesn&amp;#39;t necessary mean one is from upper class...</description></item><item><title>Re: Statham, Video, British Speech</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/StathamVideoBritishSpeech/jhzpv/post.htm#787908</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:18:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:787908</guid><dc:creator>fandorin</dc:creator><description>Here comes Tim! He&amp;#39;s got, I don&amp;#39;t know, softer and damped pronunciation.</description></item><item><title>Re: Too much dialog?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TooMuchDialog/kqgvq/post.htm#915670</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 07:45:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:915670</guid><dc:creator>ronb</dc:creator><description>I&amp;#39;d like to see what the setting is - if it&amp;#39;s a real soapbox debate in public *before* the cussin ... maybe at the American Legion hall, beforehand - but you probably just left off the action lines. Fun speech though. It&amp;#39;s from John Astin&amp;#39;s movie &amp;quot;Brother&amp;#39;s O&amp;#39;Toole&amp;quot; (1973). It&amp;#39;s been about 30 years since I&amp;#39;ve seen the movie but I still remember this one scene.And, you&amp;#39;re right, just giving the speech leaves a lot out. The setup is a spitting, farting, belching contest and Michael O&amp;#39;Toole launches out at the city folk, their mouths go wide and you think they&amp;#39;re getting ticked off because he&amp;#39;s insulting them but as it turns out they&amp;#39;re just enthralled with his superb...</description></item><item><title>What did Chairman Howard Bernan mean with "you're going to encourage him"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhatChairmanHowardBernanMeanYoure-GoingEncourage/whpzl/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:03:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:706990</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>At the end of the video, Chairman Howard Bernan ends the sweet talk between Hillary and Ron Paul with &amp;quot;you&amp;#39;re going to encourage him&amp;quot;. What does this imply?   On a higher implied level (is there a better word for this?), does he mean Hillary&amp;#39;s compliments will &amp;#39;encourage&amp;#39; Ron Paul to run again for president and take up some of the votes?</description></item><item><title>Re: Talent -- not that hard to spot</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TalentNotThatHardToSpot/2/kprqz/Post.htm#910248</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:23:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:910248</guid><dc:creator>ronb</dc:creator><description>I&amp;#39;m guessing everyone has seen Susan Boyle on &amp;quot;Britain&amp;#39;s Got ... enjoy this:  (Kind of melts away a little cynicism.)  http://blogs.suntimes.com/scanners/2009/04/reality what a concept.html And the cynicism grows right back. Hasn&amp;#39;t with me. At least not where Susan Boyle&amp;#39;s performance is concerned. But I&amp;#39;ve got to admit that my cynicism about the cynics on this newsgroup has gone way up. It just seems to be something about people here (and I guess in the world in general) that makes them want to tear down other people&amp;#39;s accomplishments. Oh well, while the smart-assed and smarmy (does not apply specifically to most here, I&amp;#39;m speaking of the Jon Stewart&amp;#39;s of the world) get their chuckles and show off...</description></item><item><title>Re: Talent -- not that hard to spot</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TalentNotThatHardToSpot/kprqz/post.htm#909330</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:30:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:909330</guid><dc:creator>avoid normal situations.</dc:creator><description>I&amp;#39;m guessing everyone has seen Susan Boyle on &amp;quot;Britain&amp;#39;s Got Talent&amp;quot; Well, not everyone is silly enough to watch television. :-) but, if not, I think you&amp;#39;ll enjoy this:  Damn that was good. (Kind of melts away a little cynicism.) But I *like* my cynicism. I get to be right so much more often that way. alt.flame Special Forces &amp;quot;We must hate hatred is the basis of communism. Children must be taught to hate their parents if they are not communists.&amp;quot; Nikolai Lenin, speech to the Commissars of Education, Moscow, 1923</description></item><item><title>Re: Movies That Might Have Been: ZEPPELIN VS. PTERODACTYLS!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/MoviesMightZeppelinPterodactyls/kxpng/post.htm#908602</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:10:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:908602</guid><dc:creator>brian christgau</dc:creator><description>What a shame Hammer Film Productions never got this off ... movie serial episode out of the idea:  Cheers, B  Speaking of which this goes back to the old Meriam C. Cooper/Willis O&amp;#39;Brien project from the thirties &amp;quot;The ... the Viking&amp;#39;s lost valley? There were dinosaurs there, too. There&amp;#39;s a movie I kind of wish had been made. http://roberthood.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/26/will-the-eagles-fly/ Oh God... does that sound like a Charles H. Schneer/Ray Harryhausen project or what? I&amp;#39;m definitely looking forward to the WAR EAGLES comic. I had just been thinking that although a ZEPPELIN VS. PTERODACTYLS movie would be a pretty hard sell (except maybe as a Sci- Fi Channel turkey) it would almost certainly get greenlit as a...</description></item><item><title>Re: Movies That Might Have Been: ZEPPELIN VS. PTERODACTYLS!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/MoviesMightZeppelinPterodactyls/kxpng/post.htm#908600</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 01:35:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:908600</guid><dc:creator>nmstevens</dc:creator><description>What a shame Hammer Film Productions never got this off the ground: http://airminded.org/2007/05/25/the-movie-that-time-forgot/ Some glorious lunatic even made a mock Republic movie serial episode out of the idea:  Cheers, B Speaking of which this goes back to the old Meriam C. Cooper/Willis O&amp;#39;Brien project from the thirties &amp;quot;The War Eagles&amp;quot; in which explorers discover a lost race of Vikings who ride on the backs of giant eagles who then ultimately end up fighting off an invasion by Nazis flying Zeppelins in a pitched battle over the skies of New York City. Oh, and the Viking&amp;#39;s lost valley? There were dinosaurs there, too. There&amp;#39;s a movie I kind of wish had been made....</description></item><item><title>Post</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Numbers/wznrh/post.htm#696624</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:01:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:696624</guid><dc:creator>tanit</dc:creator><description>To read the part after the decimal point , you need to say each number separately, like this: 
  1.23 =&amp;gt; One point two three.  
  π = 3.14 =&amp;gt; Pi equals three point one four.  
  
  
 That&amp;#39;s what I would say, either, and what Swann* considers correct:   We write and say decimals like this: 0.4   nought point four (NOT nought comma four)  0.374  nought point three seven five (NOT nought point three hundred and seventy-five )  4.7   four point seven   (yes, I know ... Americans don&amp;#39;t say &amp;quot; nought &amp;quot; )   However, I think I&amp;#39;ve also heard things like &amp;quot; one point twenty-three &amp;quot; (which I might find myself saying ), &amp;quot; one and twenty-three &amp;quot; and even just &amp;quot; one twenty-three &amp;quot; (when...</description></item><item><title>Snagglepuss and his use of the word ''marbelized''</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SnagglepussWordMarbelized/wzbwl/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:57:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:693169</guid><dc:creator>deflected by the sun</dc:creator><description>Good day, teachers!  I have so mething to show you,      Exactly at (3:55) :snaggllpus says something like : &amp;#39;&amp;#39;Heavens to you know what, he&amp;#39;ll be slaughtered &amp;#39;  &amp;#39;marbelized&amp;#39;&amp;#39;  even .  Marbelized?!  mar·ble·ize    (mär&amp;#39;bə-līz&amp;#39;)   Pronunciation Key   BOF_HEAD &amp;gt;tr.v. EOF_HEAD &amp;gt; BOF_SUBHEAD &amp;gt; mar·ble·ized , mar·ble·iz·ing , mar·ble·iz·es  EOF_SUBHEAD &amp;gt;BOF_DEF &amp;gt;To marble.</description></item><item><title>Grisham speech, I need a proficient ear</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GrishamSpeechProficient-Ear/wvwrd/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:32:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:690135</guid><dc:creator>fandorin</dc:creator><description>Hi everyone! please, help me to make out some moments I&amp;#39;m confused with. Thank you so much!   01:04. What did Grisham finished phrase with? 02:16 &amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s obviously breaks down someone in administration...&amp;quot; Right?  02:57-03:01 I make out just drops and pieces. Can you please put down what he has said?  03:08-03:10 &amp;quot;I might have ..&amp;quot; 03:18 &amp;quot;I used to give a speech called, I called the &amp;quot; tapped in reasons&amp;quot;...&amp;quot;  04:18 &amp;quot;Law school, You&amp;#39;re supposed to explode lawschool with a...&amp;quot;  05:17-05:22 &amp;quot;Not get all. People hate lawayers, this is..&amp;quot; 05:30-05:32 It doesn&amp;#39;t make sense. &amp;quot;These could really get out of here... &amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>George Clooney on BBC</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GeorgeClooneyOnBbc/wvddm/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:41:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:688750</guid><dc:creator>saltukhan</dc:creator><description>I wanna share another celebrity video with you. Its a funny video but i cant understand all dialogs. I ask for help to tell me what they are talking exactly. by the way i am adding this video to Video and Distance Learning Forum because it can be used for english listening practises.   1. Its St. Patrick&amp;#39;s day. I had a.......   What does he say here?   00:19   2. What is she saying? I dont understand anything.  00:31 3. I am not runaway with a poodle.  Is he saying poodle?  00:46 4. She says &amp;quot; Thats not a poodle. Thats a west..&amp;quot; What is she talking about?  00:49 5. She says &amp;quot; I think you should get bra......&amp;quot;  I dont understand again.   01:58 6. She says &amp;quot; Depends on what you see... on weighty&amp;quot;  Is it...</description></item><item><title>Re: To stand tall before the Man</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ToStandTallBeforeTheMan/wdjrd/post.htm#685713</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:54:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:685713</guid><dc:creator>rayh</dc:creator><description>You&amp;#39;ll be standing at attention in front of whoever is in charge - you will be in trouble. I found a clip of this scene on Youtube   and I&amp;#39;d have to say that the colonel is talking about the next officer up the chain which, since we can see that we&amp;#39;re dealing with a bird colonel, would of necessity be a general.</description></item><item><title>Re: Coppola Pimps His Latest!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CoppolaPimpsHisLatest/knrwc/post.htm#899313</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:01:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:899313</guid><dc:creator>nmstevens</dc:creator><description>tmQ W : ) Now, there&amp;#39;s a story of a career that truly faltered. Early on, some of the greatest movies in American cinema maybe some of the greatest movies ever. The Godfather one and two. Apocalyse Now, the Conversation. And then it&amp;#39;s as if something just disappeared. One From the Heart was just emotionally empty. A disaster. And it was as if he never really recovered from it. He&amp;#39;s never made anything on the level of those early movies since. It&amp;#39;s just as if something went out of him. It&amp;#39;s funny there was really a whole generation of filmmakers around that time that made a few (or even one or two) excellent movies early - and then never quite reached the level of those early movies. Certainly George Lucas is one of...</description></item><item><title>Re: Where the stress falls in a word</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/MovingStress/3/zvnrr/Post.htm#670131</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:17:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:670131</guid><dc:creator>kooyeen</dc:creator><description>Update (this is an old thread) What Mister Micawber was saying is probably true, even though it might be very difficult to notice. Intonation might be distracting and so the perception of stresses might be affected. I happened to read something about this, and I realized I actually would tend to shift stresses all the time. I have never studied intonation, and I have never paid too much attention to sentence stress, because I know it is actually too complicated to understand with only a few rules of thumb. My approach to stress and intonation is &amp;quot;listen to enough conversations and you will pick it up unconsciously&amp;quot;, so I won&amp;#39;t try to analyze anything here. What I am going to post is one thing I looked up on Youtube: I...</description></item><item><title>Turkish PM Erdogan and Davos Annual Meeting 2009</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TurkishErdoganDavosAnnualMeeting-2009/hpqlr/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:46:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:663153</guid><dc:creator>saltukhan</dc:creator><description>First of all, Have you listened the Gaza debate in Davos 2009 Annual? Have you seen or heard about the walk out of Turkish PM Recep Tayyip Erdoğan? If not, please watch this           1 hour 8 min 28 sec For the last scene which Turkish PM walked out DAVOS    1 min  53 sec   Then what do you think about this debate? Was Turkish PM right to take a promise for talk again? Was he right with his ideas and claims about ISRAEL? Many Turkish people welcomed him in the İstanbul Atatürk Airport. What do you think about this?  For me and as a Turkish citizen, i think he acted truely. The moderator, Ignatius, shouldn&amp;#39;t touch to Erdogan while he was talking. He shouldn&amp;#39;t cut his speech when he was angry. Those doesn&amp;#39;t fit with Davos. In...</description></item><item><title>Re: Believe the stones...</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BelieveTheStones/hnpxm/post.htm#653541</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:44:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:653541</guid><dc:creator>madhulk</dc:creator><description>It&amp;#39;s hard to be sure; I&amp;#39;d have to watch the video. I assume he&amp;#39;s talking about Clark, because he says &amp;quot;good for you.&amp;quot;  Was there a third person in the conversation? If he was looking at the third person, he might have made some gesture when he said &amp;#39;this guy&amp;#39;.    Here&amp;#39;s the clip below. Just to know I&amp;#39;ve messed up the names.  Clark is undercover and pretends to be Joe. And I didn&amp;#39;t  know the name of the cop so I called him Joe by mistake.  So does the cop mean Joe is too brave? The moment starts at 1:00 .   Edit: Link removed.</description></item><item><title>Speaking of Remakes...</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SpeakingOfRemakes/kkqmc/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:39:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:889170</guid><dc:creator>brian christgau</dc:creator><description>Oh I want this *so* bad:  page Cheers, B</description></item><item><title>Re: Why do linguists get no respect?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhyLinguistsRespect/hznch/post.htm#620318</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:45:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:620318</guid><dc:creator>kooyeen</dc:creator><description>Why do linguists get no respect?  I&amp;#39;m not sure why any particular group should &amp;quot;get respect&amp;quot;.  LOL, that&amp;#39;s a good point too. Linguists get no respect, ok. But why should they? People who burp loudly at formal dinners get no respect either, and that&amp;#39;s unfair, I know. Everyone needs respect! Anyway, no matter what linguists discover, people will never believe them. Ebonics might be treated as language, but I don&amp;#39;t think I am likely to hear a lot of people say &amp;quot;Oh, until yesterday I thought black people were just uneducated and couldn&amp;#39;t speak properly, but now I know it&amp;#39;s not so and I changed my mind: the are not uneducated at all!&amp;quot; - In my opinion they&amp;#39;ll still stick to their opinion...</description></item><item><title>Re: David Mamet on free speech</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DavidMametOnFreeSpeech/kwwcx/post.htm#876969</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:58:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:876969</guid><dc:creator>nmstevens</dc:creator><description>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/david-mamet-the-media- must-not-allow-government-to-proscribe-free-speech-1024521.html http://tinyurl.com/5b2kgl David Mamet: The media must not allow ... &amp;quot;job&amp;quot; is now to make the Obama presidency work.  The US news media don&amp;#39;t need a Fairness Doctrine, they need an Objectivity Doctrine.- Hide quoted text - Well, given that every human being&amp;#39;s view of the world and of events is inevitably a *subjective* one, who exactly would we put in charge of enforcing this &amp;quot;Objectivity Doctrine?&amp;quot; NMS</description></item><item><title>Re: David Mamet on free speech</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DavidMametOnFreeSpeech/kwwcx/post.htm#876916</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:55:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:876916</guid><dc:creator>skipper</dc:creator><description>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/david-mamet-the-media- must-not-allow-government-to-proscribe-free-speech-1024521.html http://tinyurl.com/5b2kgl David Mamet: The media must not allow ... &amp;quot;job&amp;quot; is now to make the Obama presidency work.  The US news media don&amp;#39;t need a Fairness Doctrine, they need an Objectivity Doctrine. I&amp;#39;d just like to know who the master programmer is; you&amp;#39;re assuming they&amp;#39;re capable of independent thought.</description></item><item><title>Re: David Mamet on free speech</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DavidMametOnFreeSpeech/kwwcx/post.htm#876905</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:48:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:876905</guid><dc:creator /><description>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/david-mamet-the-media- must-not-allow-government-to-proscribe-free-speech-1024521.html http://tinyurl.com/5b2kgl David Mamet: The media must not allow government to proscribe free speech Wednesday, 19 November 2008 The ... ran this by Chris Matthews on NBC, who announced his &amp;quot;job&amp;quot; is now to make the Obama presidency work.  The US news media don&amp;#39;t need a Fairness Doctrine, they need an Objectivity Doctrine.</description></item><item><title>Re: David Mamet on free speech</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DavidMametOnFreeSpeech/kwwcx/post.htm#876891</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:35:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:876891</guid><dc:creator>nmstevens</dc:creator><description>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/david-mamet-the-media- must-not-allow-government-to-proscribe-free-speech-1024521.html http://tinyurl.com/5b2kgl David Mamet: The media must not allow government to proscribe free speech Wednesday, 19 November 2008 The ... ran this by Chris Matthews on NBC, who announced his &amp;quot;job&amp;quot; is now to make the Obama presidency work.  Um not to *** on your parade or anything or to pretend that you actually have any problem with something along the lines of reading comprehension, but Mamet is *opposing* the fairness doctrine. That would mean that networks *wouldn&amp;#39;t* have to present a &amp;quot;fair and balanced&amp;quot; view of the issues but could, in much the way that newspapers always have,...</description></item><item><title>David Mamet on free speech</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DavidMametOnFreeSpeech/kwwcx/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:56:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:876874</guid><dc:creator>skipper</dc:creator><description>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/david-mamet-the-media- must-not-allow-government-to-proscribe-free-speech-1024521.html http://tinyurl.com/5b2kgl David Mamet: The media must not allow government to proscribe free speech Wednesday, 19 November 2008 The so-called Fairness Doctrine, the enforcement of the doctrine that any broadcast medium, voicing one political opinion must voice another, dissenting opinion will be the beginning of the end of free speech. Here&amp;#39;s why: Who is to say what is political opinion? The line between political opinion and reportage is so blurred now as to be almost indistinct. Should such a pernicious doctrine become widespread, energy will be devoted to persuading and inevitably suborning those...</description></item><item><title>Re: Try Saying the Alphabet...</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TrySayingTheAlphabet/5/hnwzk/Post.htm#651205</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:11:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:651205</guid><dc:creator>r h draney</dc:creator><description>Charles A Lieberman filted: which describes a pre-war kind of RP, gives the pronunciations ... usual pronunciation among those who practise the sport of falconry&amp;quot;.  I read of falcons before I saw them, so I go by the spelling pronunciation /f&amp;amp;lk@n/. I say John Woods&amp;#39;s character&amp;#39;s name from &amp;quot;WarGames&amp;quot; the same way. If you need a pronunciation authority, try this:  ..r &amp;quot;You got Schadenfreude on my Weltanschauung!&amp;quot; &amp;quot;You got Weltanschauung in my Schadenfreude!&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Re: On Topic - How Much Slack...?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/OnTopicHowMuchSlack/2/khwzh/Post.htm#873007</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 05:02:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:873007</guid><dc:creator>avoid normal situations.</dc:creator><description>...do you cut a film that&amp;#39;s from a different culture? Less and less, IMHO. It&amp;#39;s not like the 50s and 60s where non-American films were decidedly different. More and more &amp;quot;foreign&amp;quot; films are really made for the international (read: American) audience because (a) they can make a lot more money in the US than at home, and (b) if their makers have a success even a small one, by &amp;quot;art&amp;quot; movie standards they can go work in Hollywood and boost their salaries to the ceiling and have lunch with Julia Roberts. I don&amp;#39;t think many people ever saw Croupier . Yet Clive Owen was ubiquitous afterwards. What brings this up for me is a conversation I was having, a while ago, about John Woo. Americans have ... and then holding...</description></item><item><title>Re: "Radical" redistribution of wealth strategy - Obama 2001</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/RadicalRedistributionWealthStrategy-Obama2001/kgmbb/post.htm#868225</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:39:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:868225</guid><dc:creator>skipper</dc:creator><description>And speaking of sounds are you getting ready to say &amp;quot;President Obama?&amp;quot;  Sure is: In political rants for at least four years. Reeducation and genocide. Here&amp;#39;s Obama&amp;#39;s buddy Ayers&amp;#39; and his Weather Underground&amp;#39;s plans for the U.S. population back in the 60s.  weUY Vote Obama if you&amp;#39;re a damned fool, and that&amp;#39;s exactly what you&amp;#39;ll be.</description></item><item><title>Re: Skippy's smear tactics are backfiring.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SkippysSmearTacticsBackfiring/kgwkl/post.htm#867485</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:867485</guid><dc:creator>jackson pillock</dc:creator><description>@reader1.panix.com: @reader1.panix.com: For instance, Obama is a US citizen by birth, and can prove it.  LOL, how?  Watch it, Andy Phillips. Watch all of it. Gulp and watch it again. He&amp;#39;s a fake just like your &amp;quot;Jackson Pillock&amp;quot; fake name. First of all, Skip, I am not intimidated by you. I choose to use a &amp;#39;nym because it is both anonymous and distinctive, no other reason. I find it laughable that you think I&amp;#39;d be ashamed of the my given and family name. Shall I call you by your name? The one you earned in misc.writing? Secondly, each and every charge made on that YouTube video has been debunked and debunked again. Whether you like it or not, Barack Hussein Obama has three AMERICAN names, and is as American as you...</description></item><item><title>Re: Obamessiah - says Louis Farrakhan</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ObamessiahSaysLouisFarrakhan/kzpzc/post.htm#864328</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:02:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:864328</guid><dc:creator>mc</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;When the messiah speaks.&amp;quot;  p=192453 Of course, he&amp;#39;s talking about a Muslim messiah, isn&amp;#39;t he? Is there a difference between the God the Jews, the Muslims and the Christians worship? Do tell. And please provide credible citations if your answer is yes. If the answer is no, there isn&amp;#39;t a difference, then I think you&amp;#39;ll find all three religions have the same basic expectation of the same Messiah. The only difference of opinion between the Jews and the Muslims and Christians being whether or not he&amp;#39;s already been here. Islam and Christianity say yes. And his name was Jesus. Although In Islam, Jesus is not considered to be the Son of God in a literal sense. Judaism says no. Not yet. Except for some who say yes,...</description></item><item><title>Re: Obamessiah - says Louis Farrakhan</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ObamessiahSaysLouisFarrakhan/kzpzc/post.htm#864224</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:55:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:864224</guid><dc:creator>skipper</dc:creator><description>Of course, he&amp;#39;s talking about a Muslim messiah, isn&amp;#39;t he?  No - Neobama - McCain said he was That One... the Oracle must have confirmed that Obama is the one, the chosen one. Does Morpheus know this? - Bill What&amp;#39;s the matter, dickless, can&amp;#39;t even bear to watch it, so you have to cut the link? Here it is again -  Have another drink.</description></item><item><title>Obamessiah - says Louis Farrakhan</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ObamessiahSaysLouisFarrakhan/kzpzc/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:42:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:864197</guid><dc:creator>skipper</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;When the messiah speaks.&amp;quot;  p=192453 Of course, he&amp;#39;s talking about a Muslim messiah, isn&amp;#39;t he?</description></item><item><title>Re: Sucking Knee Wound</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SuckingKneeWound/krdhb/post.htm#836444</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 05:46:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:836444</guid><dc:creator>ronb</dc:creator><description>Yeah, I know how those &amp;#39;stealth injuries&amp;#39; can sneak up on you. Â I got shot in the foot and didn&amp;#39;t realize it until my shoe started to squish. Â &amp;quot;God damn Floorsheim shoe&amp;quot; Robert Towne Speaking of getting shot in the foot, did anyone here see the YouTube video of a DEA agent who shot himself in the foot during a gun safety course?   RonB &amp;quot;There&amp;#39;s a story there...somewhere&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Re: YT: Your sappy video of the day</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/YtYourSappyVideoOfTheDay/jqghh/post.htm#832172</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:45:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:832172</guid><dc:creator>schlockhack</dc:creator><description>I want to live in this version of NY. Speaking of living in a world of fantasy, here&amp;#39;s a video by Lily Allen which is brilliant short film in its own right. Lilly Allen: LDN</description></item><item><title>Re: YT: Glad I don't live in London</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/YtGladIDontLiveInLondon/jxvcl/post.htm#821860</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 09:58:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:821860</guid><dc:creator>jackson pillock</dc:creator><description>@reader2.panix.com: Does the BBC cover this?  gspot.com/ http://tinyurl.com/6beoqn Those deluded religious fanatics were shouting slogans totally hostile to the values held by most Londoners (including the vast majority of Muslims, who do vote), yet they were basically free to do so. The police were concerned with public order and safety, not the hateful, stupid content of what the man was saying. I would be happy to live in a city where free speech is allowed and protected. On the other hand, you can&amp;#39;t just say anything. During the Danish Cartoons row, police filmed and prosecuted a man who wore a pretend suicide belt, and another who carried a sign, &amp;#39;Behead those who insult Islam,&amp;#39; to name a couple. As to whether the BBC...</description></item><item><title>Re: Are you the next Hitchcock, Romero, or Lucas?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AreNextHitchcockRomeroLucas/jnprn/post.htm#819990</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:07:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:819990</guid><dc:creator /><description>Claw, Festival Director Terror Film Festival Horror, Fantasy, Sci-fi, Thriller, Drama, Screenplay October 21-25, 2008 &amp;gt; Philadelphia, PA www.TerrorFilmFestival.net Hey man, why you dropping corporate written statements on us, maann. Don&amp;#39;t you like totally know that we are all artists here? The fest sounds rad enough but I don&amp;#39;t party in Philly, man. I heard somewhere that people from Philly spend an average of 47 minutes of every waking day, explaining to people that &amp;quot;they aren&amp;#39;t from NY, they&amp;#39;re from Philly&amp;quot; Anyway, good luck out there, I&amp;#39;ll totally check you guys out, and blog it up on my blog. But you know what sucks about alot of film festivals, and even Imax. The social networking film festival...</description></item><item><title>Re: motion capture and the "uncanny valley"</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/MotionCaptureUncannyValley/2/jnbzj/Post.htm#817158</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:58:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:817158</guid><dc:creator>nmstevens</dc:creator><description>So I was just watching a short video segment about this concept known as the &amp;quot;Uncanny Valley.&amp;quot;  Well I don&amp;#39;t think it&amp;#39;s quite there yet, but this demo is very close. Actually, reviewing it, I suspect this motion capture tied to the best texturing and lighting composited expertly into a natural scene would fool many.  You see, I think that this exactly illustrates the point because it&amp;#39;s precisely demonstrates the &amp;quot;close but no cigar&amp;quot; aspect of this technology. It just flat out doesn&amp;#39;t look &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; and when that CGI girl smiles and shows her perfect peg-like teeth, or scowls and shows the not- quite real interior of her mouth and the illusion degrades just that little bit more for me, at least,...</description></item><item><title>Re: Best documentary of the year (already)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BestDocumentaryYearAlready/2/jmjxv/Post.htm#813888</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:19:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:813888</guid><dc:creator>jackson pillock</dc:creator><description>Hmm, you&amp;#39;re right about Dawinism. It is dangerous. Mind you, ... able to kill babies as much as they&amp;#39;d like to.  If, as you claim (and I don&amp;#39;t plan on getting into a fifteen trillion message over this again)Darwinism was on ... the audacity to publish something that countered Darwinism in a scientific magazine. Is freedom of speech that scary to Darwinists? I think evolution is poorly understood. Here is what it claims, and what it can show: &amp;#39;Life results from the non-random survival of randomly varying replicators.&amp;#39; That&amp;#39;s a little harder to take on board than, &amp;#39;the earth is a sphere.&amp;#39; So, because it is poorly understood, biology teachers, writers and researchers constantly have to correct misconceptions....</description></item><item><title>Back on topic. (was: OT- My first YouTube clip)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/OtMyFirstYoutubeClip/3/jlkbx/Post.htm#809007</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:30:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:809007</guid><dc:creator>avoid normal situations.</dc:creator><description>So, I&amp;#39;ve entered some sort of new age. I just completed my first home- made video (excluding those little super-8 ... a politically-themed video. I leave it to to guess the specific topic. For those interested, here is a link:  I appreciated getting to see that video. It&amp;#39;s erudite, unranty, and very much stands out from the crowd on YouTube by virtue of not being (a) stolen or (b) the issue of some kid who has a camcorder and too much time on his hands. More personally, having read your posts here and on alt.horror for a long time now, it was interesting to hear what your voice sounds like. It also reduced a very complex affair the choice of the United States&amp;#39;s next Chief Executive down to one issue, and it didn&amp;#39;t make a...</description></item><item><title>Re: OT- My first YouTube clip</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/OtMyFirstYoutubeClip/2/jlkbx/Post.htm#808811</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:25:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:808811</guid><dc:creator>nmstevens</dc:creator><description>So, I&amp;#39;ve entered some sort of new age. I just ... topic. For those interested, here is a link:  NMS  Right after the Wyoming count that&amp;#39;s quite a great PR*! (Hey, no venom here, since nms stated BEFORE Wyoming his ... cheap speech! And I think that, in given circumstances, McCain might be the best choice. nms: &amp;quot;McCain tries to  The same thing that was wrong with trying to win the war in Vietnam. We were fighting the wrong war against the wrong enemy. We thought we were fighting a war against a Soviet puppet regime controlling the North. The North thought they were fighting a civil war with us acting as the puppet regime controlling the South. The only trouble is it really was a civil war, and we&amp;#39;d gotten ourselves into...</description></item><item><title>Re: OT- My first YouTube clip</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/OtMyFirstYoutubeClip/jlkbx/post.htm#808810</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:46:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:808810</guid><dc:creator>l8 nuz</dc:creator><description>So, I&amp;#39;ve entered some sort of new age. I just completed my first home- made video (excluding those little super-8 ... politically-themed video. I leave it to to guess the specific topic. For those interested, here is a link:  NMS Right after the Wyoming count that&amp;#39;s quite a great PR*! (Hey, no venom here, since nms stated BEFORE Wyoming his sympathy for Hussein ...) I always knew that I was born to belong to a (Google) NG that will make HISTORY. Too bad that it appears (as of today&amp;#39;s nms YouTube link) that it ain&amp;#39;t me writing IT. Oh well, back to specs .. * that was catchy for the American voters, which are known to be ignorant (and I&amp;#39;ll stop here). Since I&amp;#39;m not one of them I can&amp;#39;t but wish the other two...</description></item><item><title>Re: YT: Time-wasting vid of the day</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/YtTimeWastingVidOfTheDay/jwrrc/post.htm#791036</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:00:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:791036</guid><dc:creator /><description>@reader1.panix.com:  I have a plant named Robert.  h586Ep9M&amp;amp;feature=related  Mary, Mary, Mary. I don&amp;#39;t think you &amp;quot;get* YouTube. It&amp;#39;s not about music videos or political speeches. It&amp;#39;s about the ... *under* the treadmills). Get in touch with your inner sideshow and get out of the middle of the road. jaybee Oh pardon moi, did I cause a speed bump in your path to coolness? Sorry if Led Zepp rocks my boat. If you can&amp;#39;t rock n roll, take the slow boat and grab the oars. So here&amp;#39;s the antidote:</description></item><item><title>Re: YT: Time-wasting vid of the day</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/YtTimeWastingVidOfTheDay/jwrrc/post.htm#791005</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:03:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:791005</guid><dc:creator>jacques e. bouchard</dc:creator><description>@reader1.panix.com: I have a plant named Robert.  h586Ep9M&amp;amp;feature=related Mary, Mary, Mary. I don&amp;#39;t think you &amp;quot;get* YouTube. It&amp;#39;s not about music videos or political speeches. It&amp;#39;s about the guy in a tutu juggling squid, or the 2,647 videos of cats on treadmills (or, for the slow cats, *under* the treadmills). Get in touch with your inner sideshow and get out of the middle of the road. jaybee</description></item><item><title>Re: Will the real Robin London, please stand up?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WillRealRobinLondonStand/jhngd/post.htm#790885</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:18:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:790885</guid><dc:creator>michael</dc:creator><description>SPPAY Listen to hubby, wife of Pink, laugh at the end.  Does everyone understand that if everyone blocked her, she&amp;#39;d be the only one who knows she&amp;#39;s here? I don&amp;#39;t understand all the Pinky baiting. Tune her out and leaver her alone. Caroline I still don&amp;#39;t know what you&amp;#39;re all talking about.</description></item></channel></rss>