<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Vowels tag:Pronunciation tag:Verbs' matching tags 'Vowels', 'Pronunciation', and 'Verbs'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aVowels+tag%3aPronunciation+tag%3aVerbs</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Vowels tag:Pronunciation tag:Verbs' matching tags 'Vowels', 'Pronunciation', and 'Verbs'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>XMOD (Build: 3616.28671)</generator><item><title>Re: Do AMericans pronounce " forty" as fordi or forti?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DoAmericansPronounceFortyFordiForti/2/ggjcd/Post.htm#535840</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:34:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:535840</guid><dc:creator>sumryan</dc:creator><description>My students always have questions about this pronunciation feature. I know of four patterns that might help you predict where to pronounce &amp;#39;t&amp;#39; as a soft /d/. 1. when a ‘t’ is between vowels when the preceding vowel is stressed in words such as: city, party, forty, water 2. when a ‘t’ comes before a syllabic /l/ sound in words such as: petal, metal, settle 3. in past tense verbs ending in ‘t’ such as: educated, excited, defeated 4. in comparative adjectives ending in ‘t’ such as: greater, greatest, smarter, smartest There may be other patterns or rules as well. Good luck with this. Susan  &amp;lt;link removed by a mod.&amp;gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Say and says</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SayAndSays/zhmld/post.htm#457186</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:40:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:457186</guid><dc:creator>pter</dc:creator><description>CalifJim wrote:    I thought you were only looking for irregular verb forms.     I am indeed looking for something like irregular verb forms. The comparison with bays, days, etc. is just a remark. But what is intriguing is that says is not an irregular verb. It is formed by just adding an  s . It's just a "normal" third person singular verb. That's why I find it strange and exceptional. As a comparison, go and went sound completely different and the spelling are completely different. Could it be possible that says was not spelt this way in the past? It would also be interesting if we can find a "normal" plural form that sounds completely differently from the singular form.     CalifJim wrote:     again and against also have ai as a lax e...</description></item><item><title>Re: Say and says</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SayAndSays/zhmld/post.htm#456769</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 22:58:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:456769</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>I cannot find any word with ay or ai that is
pronounced this way, except those with -says or -said at the end.
    I thought you were only looking for irregular verb forms. 
 
 again and against also have ai as a lax e , if that's what you want examples of. 
And all the air combinations also have ai as a lax e .  pair, hair, fair, ... 
And those with aire :  debonaire, millionaire, questionaire, solitaire, ... 
__________ 
 
 aisle (with silent s and silent e ) has ai as tense i . (Same pronunciation as I'll .)  ai is tense i also in Sinai and Shanghai . 
 
 plaid has ai as lax a . (As if plad , to rhyme with sad .) 
 
 dais has two vowels: tense a and lax i . ( day -iss) So does the old form saith (and the -aic 's:  laic,...</description></item><item><title>Re: The word BABY</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TheWordBaby/cqrvq/post.htm#304561</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:11:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:304561</guid><dc:creator>kooyeen</dc:creator><description>I hear that very often. I guess that phenomenon has something to do with lazy pronunciation, since I heard it mostly in songs, especially in rock or metal songs where singers shout and don't articulate the words properly. While I'm writing this post, I'm listening to a song where you can notice that clearly, Paradise City by Guns 'n' Roses:  "Take me down to the paradise city where the grass is green and the girls are pretty"  ---- the  y  in  city  and  pretty  is not the same sound as the vowel in the verb  lead . The one in  city  tends to the vowel sound in  lid , the same applies to the one in  pretty , but it even tends to the vowel sound in  led . The fact is that I listen so much to that kind of music that I practically never...</description></item><item><title>Re: I'm desperate!  I need help :(</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ImDesperateINeedHelp/dwrkz/post.htm#290103</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 04:39:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:290103</guid><dc:creator>tartan</dc:creator><description>8. Why do you say “She is a one-eyed teacher” and not “ She’s an one eyed teacher”? (Focus on a phonetic explanation) The article an is used before vowel sounds, not vowel letters. The word one is pronounced wun . The w is not a vowel sound even though the o in o-n-e is a vowel. So a must be used before one . 
  

 9. Miss Justine Fair listened to the two Chilean students read their passages. One of them had a  strong accent . The second student had no accent at all. Who got the best mark? Why? (Focus on a Phonetic explanation)  Accent is a form of mispronunciation, of giving vowels and consonants different values from their standards. Mastery of a language requires control over the sounds of the language.  
  
 10. One of the...</description></item><item><title>Re: Basic words list classified by vowel sounds -- is there any?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BasicWordsListClassifiedVowelSounds/dczpg/post.htm#262386</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 02:29:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:262386</guid><dc:creator>feathers</dc:creator><description>CalifJim wrote:      er , ir , and ur followed by a consonant or at the end of a word are all pronounced the same. 
 
 term, bird, turn, her, sir, fur 
verb, shirt, hurt, verse, dirge, curve 
 
 ear followed by a consonant (but not at the end of a word) is also pronounced the same as those above. 
 
 learn, heard, search, rehearse, pearl 
 
Except:  beard  (as if beerd), heart (as if hart), hearth ( as if harth) 
 
our followed by a consonant has the same pronunciation in only a few words. 
 
 journal, journalist, adjourn, adjournment, tourney, tournament, courtesy, courteous 
 
CJ     This is thorough... ! It helps me a lot. Thank you. What I need now is -- practice. Let's adjourn to another forum...</description></item><item><title>Re: Basic words list classified by vowel sounds -- is there any?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BasicWordsListClassifiedVowelSounds/dczpg/post.htm#262381</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 02:06:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:262381</guid><dc:creator>feathers</dc:creator><description>Mister Micawber wrote:     Here are a few:  alert, avert, berserk, blur, blurt, burn, burst, burl, churn, circle, curt, curse, curds, colonel, curl, concern, discern, dessert, dirk, earn, erstwhile, exert, fern, fertile, girl, gird, hurt, hearse, hurtle, heard, insert, inert, jerk, kernel, lurk, learn, myrtle, myrrh, nurse, overt, occur, perk, perverse, purse, perquisite, purl, pearl, pert, quirk, return, reverse, recur, refer, skirt, shirt, spurt, squirt, stern, stir, tern, turn, turtle, thermometer, urn, vertical, version, verse, verb, word, work, worse, Xerxes, yurt, and zircon .       P er fect ...! Oh...! You are so kind! I cannot thank you enough, MM!     CalifJim wrote:     





Feathers, 
 
I'm a little puzzled by your...</description></item><item><title>Re: is it a matter of phonology?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IsItAMatterOfPhonology/dbqgq/post.htm#260469</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:36:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:260469</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>It sounds a little more like morphology, but I could be wrong. 
There are numerous cases where a particular alternation between two
vowels (or consonants) occurs in this way.  They occur in
both the Germanic and Latinate components of English. 
 
find - found; bind - bound; grind - ground; pride - proud; mice - mouse 
keep - kept; sleep - slept; weep - wept 
pronounce - pronunciation; announce - annunciation 
require - request; inquire - inquest 
conjoin - conjunction 
retain - retention; detain - detention; abstain - abstention 
extrude - extrusion; include - inclusion; protrude - protrusion 
erode - erosion; invade - invasion; provide - provision; decide - decision; conclude - conclusion 
convert - conversion; pervert -...</description></item><item><title>Re: same vowel sound?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SameVowelSound/cxbcx/post.htm#236672</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:24:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:236672</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>Yes.  er , ir , and ur followed by a consonant or at the end of a word are all pronounced the same. 
 
 term, bird, turn, her, sir, fur 
verb, shirt, hurt, verse, dirge, curve 
 
 ear followed by a consonant (but not at the end of a word) is also pronounced the same as those above. 
 
 learn, heard, search, rehearse, pearl 
 
Except:  beard  (as if beerd), heart (as if hart), hearth ( as if harth) 
 
our followed by a consonant has the same pronunciation in only a few words. 
 
 journal, journalist, adjourn, adjournment, tourney, tournament, courtesy, courteous 
 
CJ</description></item><item><title>Re: How to pronounce a 't' in American English</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HowPronounceAmericanEnglish/cmzmk/post.htm#229523</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 06:03:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:229523</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>I'm not familiar with MLB. 
 
In American English it is very common to omit the "t" when it
follows a stressed syllable ending in "n" and precedes an unstressed
syllable beginning with a vowel. "winter" and "winner" are
indistinguishable. The absence of the t sound here is not an aspirated t , as you seem to suggest in your post. 
 
 I don't recommend imitating this pronunciation unless you live in
a community where it is very common. Use a neutral or slightly
aspirated t instead. 
 
There is an exception -- the verb "want". "want to" and "want a"
are both pronounced "wanna" if you are speaking fairly fast in an
informal setting. The past tense is often said "wannid". 
"wanted to" is often "wannida". I don't see any great...</description></item><item><title>Re: On / Off , Of / Off</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/OnOffOfOff/bhrqk/post.htm#118217</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:39:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:118217</guid><dc:creator>teacher eric</dc:creator><description>Science_guru wrote:        Sweety_pudding wrote:     
 i think of and off just looks like earchother.. 
     
 I don't agree with this. 
  In fact I don't see any relation between "of" and "off" 
 "of" is a preposition e.g. President of America, son of Mr. List. 
 "off" is an adjective meaning "not in operation" eg. Turn off the computer. The lights are off. 
 I found following meaning when it is used as adverb 
 "From particular thing, place or position" -- they drove off 
 "No longer on or in contact" eg. clear off the dirt 
 SG 
     
  
 Even the pronunciation is different. Final sound for "off" is "f". For "of" it's "v" when the word comes before a vowel sound, and "uh" or "ah" (as in sorta = sort of) when it comes...</description></item><item><title>Re: Run + ning is related to pronunciation? Thanks !</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/RunNingRelatedPronunciation/bcckh/post.htm#94439</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 04:18:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:94439</guid><dc:creator>xcats</dc:creator><description>Hi abbie1948 ! You are nice,thank you ^_^  "Verbs ending in one stressed vowel"  How can I know of that?  Could you teach me more and suggest some good websites for me to learn?  Thanks again !!</description></item><item><title>Re: Run + ning is related to pronunciation? Thanks !</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/RunNingRelatedPronunciation/bcckh/post.htm#94140</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:38:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:94140</guid><dc:creator>abbie1948</dc:creator><description>Hi Xcats,  This is related to the spelling of the past tense forms of regular verbs; it also applies to the "ing" form.  spelling of regular affirmative past tense forms   Most regular verbs: add -ed   work —worked help —helped  start — started rain —rained  stay —stayed  show — showed  wonder —wondered  visit — visited  gallop—galloped  Verbs endingin -e: add -d   hope —hoped decide —decided  Verbs ending in one stressed vowel +one consonant (except wory): double the consonant and add -ed   shop — shopped plan —  planned refer —referred  regret — regretted  Verbs ending in consonant + -y: hurry— hurried change y to i and add-ed  cry—cried study—studied   Verbs ending in-c have ck in the past (e.g....</description></item><item><title>Re: Was vs Were</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WasVsWere/nmqx/post.htm#67741</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2005 05:12:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:67741</guid><dc:creator>just the truth</dc:creator><description>Incorrect(or informal): If I was you, I would run.   JT: I'd imagine that you've copied this from a grammar site, Victorycountry. isnot incorrect, merely an informal variant. Since it's perfectly grammatical, it's impossible for it to be incorrect.   The CGEL notes that has been used in this manner for about 300 years. How could it even be suggested that it's incorrect?  That would make singular and all the other changes that have occurred in language over the centuries also incorrect. Is the pronunciation of all ENLs, so different from that before the great vowel shift, wrong? Such a notion is truly preposterous but these old canards go on and on.    Correct: If I were you, I would run.  (The verb follows if and expresses a...</description></item><item><title>Re: Hardest Language To Teach?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HardestLanguageToTeach/3/vbxp/Post.htm#42280</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2004 02:35:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:42280</guid><dc:creator>guest</dc:creator><description>i'd say english helps you a lot . for instance when you don't know a verb but you know the name, for instance " she's got a graceful walk" and " walk the talk ". In my opinion what makes english hard is pronunciation and idioms. Especially the pronunciation of vowels which are not flat but sort of blended together. is culture "ko'lcher" or "kahlcher?"  in my humble opinion esperanto is a pretty easy language if you know at least one germanic language, and one romance language. Actually to me it sounds like Rumanian or Corsican. I still can't decide whether English or German is the hardest... tut mir leid.</description></item><item><title>Re: Strong and weak sounds in verbs????</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/StrongWeakSoundsVerbs/hmqg/post.htm#38171</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 00:21:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:38171</guid><dc:creator>novalee</dc:creator><description>Some words, not only verbs, that are used a lot in speaking, have one weak sound and one strong sound.  Weak forms are used in 'connected speech', that is, when you are having a normal, everyday conversation or when they are in the middle of a sentence. For example, the weak form of the verb 'have' is /hev/ or /ev/, e being the unstressed sound called 'swcha' (usually written as an inverted 'e'), which you can hardly hear. This form is mostly used when the verb 'have' is functioning as an auxiliary verb as in They have been doing the hovering or in sequences such as should have , could have , would have .   Strong forms are normally used when we say a word isolated from speech with an emphasis on the vowel. These forms are used by...</description></item><item><title>Re: Northern and Southern English</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/NorthernSouthernEnglish/dwpj/post.htm#34946</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:03:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:34946</guid><dc:creator>novalee</dc:creator><description>Well, latha, generally speaking, the rule says that between two vowels the sound must be pronounced /z/, as well as when you write and and sometimes . If it is next to consonants or it is written as a sibilant, then it must be pronounced /s/. For instance, has an /s/ sound. However, , or have a /z/ sound. But there are exceptions and such other factors as the surrounding sounds, that make this rule not too trustful. But there are some smaller rules applied to certain cases. The third person singular -s pronunciation varies according to which sound is found at the end of the verb. If it is a voiceless sound /p/ /t/ /k/ /f/ /sh/ /th/(strong) or /ch/ then the sound is /s/. If it finishes in a voiced sound, it is /z/. And, finally, if it's...</description></item><item><title>Re: Complexity of grammar</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ComplexityOfGrammar/6/bdjh/Post.htm#7126</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2003 15:16:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:7126</guid><dc:creator>pemmican</dc:creator><description>&gt;&gt;e) o/e(a/e)  - e - e  to dream - dreamt - dreamt  to kneel - knelt - knelt  to hold - held - held  to leave - left - left  to bereave - bereft - bereft  to sleep - slept - slept    Oops, I'm sorry!   Also these verbs actually belong to the weak ones (except "to hold")! -&gt; regular ending -t. The short pronunciation of the vowel is another assimilization, but no Ablaut as mentioned in the other rows!</description></item><item><title>Re: Complexity of grammar</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ComplexityOfGrammar/6/bdjh/Post.htm#7118</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2003 15:04:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:7118</guid><dc:creator>pemmican</dc:creator><description>Hello ssittoesl!   &gt;&gt;eg. go went gone. In Chinese, you supplement the word "GO" with additional word if you want to say someone "has gone" etc.. The integrity of the word "GO" is preserved.    Hehe, interesting you just picked out a very irregular verb of the English language!  The reason why "to go" is that irregular is because it consists (similar to "to be") of two different stems: The actual past form should be something like "gid", equal to "to do", but it has been replaced by the past tense form of the former strong verb "wend": to wend - went - went, which then became a weak verb: to wend - wended - wended.  The reason why it has been replaced was certainly due to the fact that "went" has or had a very similar meaning...</description></item></channel></rss>