<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Word order tag:Capital letters' matching tags 'Word order' and 'Capital letters'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aWord+order+tag%3aCapital+letters&amp;tag=Word+order,Capital+letters&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Word order tag:Capital letters' matching tags 'Word order' and 'Capital letters'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3191.21962)</generator><item><title>Re:  Correct or Not</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CorrectOrNot/gnhgv/post.htm#567124</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:42:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:567124</guid><dc:creator>Eimai_Anglos</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;why was late reply&amp;quot; is not a sentence. It has no meaning. In English a sentence begins with a capital letter and ends with a punctuation mark (. ; : ? !)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;In addition, you seem to have omitted a definite or indefinite article or a possessive pronoun and mixed up the word order.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;Why was his reply late?&amp;quot;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;Why was the reply late?&amp;quot;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Sv.: This Translation.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SvThisTranslation/chjjz/post.htm#204192</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 01:51:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:204192</guid><dc:creator>Nick147</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Diddy,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here is the piece with&amp;nbsp;errors corrected, and a couple of amendments made&amp;nbsp;to make the style better. All in all it looked very good, there are a couple of expressions in which the correct preposition is not obvious, you just have to know these I'm afraid! One point is that&amp;nbsp;King or Queen should always be spelled with a capital letter. There are a few places where the word order or verb tense needed changing,&amp;nbsp;it would be best if you talk about these with your teacher&amp;nbsp;if you don't understand any of the&amp;nbsp;changes I have suggested. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Happy studying!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Nick&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The battle of Bannockburn in 1314 and what happened at Culloden in 1746, are two of the bloodiest battles ever fought between Scotland and England. The first one ended [&lt;B&gt;up&lt;/B&gt; is not necessary] with a glorious victory for Robert Bruce and his Scottish partisans, while the &lt;STRONG&gt;second&lt;/STRONG&gt; one was a crushing defeat for âBonnie Prince Charlieâ and his &lt;B&gt;claim&lt;/B&gt; to the Scottish throne. Robert Bruce was crowned [&lt;B&gt;as &lt;/B&gt;is not necessary] &lt;B&gt;K&lt;/B&gt;ing of Scotland in 1306. &lt;B&gt;At&lt;/B&gt; this time it was custom[delete,] that the Scottish Kings were crowned in Scone and for 500 years they had &lt;B&gt;sat on âthe stone of sconeâ &lt;/B&gt;during the &lt;B&gt;coronation&lt;/B&gt; ceremony. The English &lt;B&gt;King&lt;/B&gt; Edward I had in the meantime removed the stone during one of his campaigns, and placed it in Westminster Abbey, where it has remained &lt;B&gt;for&lt;/B&gt; the last 700 years. The present English &lt;B&gt;Q&lt;/B&gt;ueen &lt;STRONG&gt;was&lt;/STRONG&gt; crowned on exactly this old â[delete &lt;B&gt;the]&lt;/B&gt; stone of destinyâ.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Bruceâs crowning was dramatic: he murdered his rival, âthe Red Comynâ, in the church in Dumfries and &lt;B&gt;afterwards&lt;/B&gt; &lt;B&gt;rode in&lt;/B&gt; a hurry to Scone to take over the crown. Comyn was one of the vassals whom King Edward had installed in his attempt to make Scotland English territory and the &lt;B&gt;killing &lt;/B&gt;formed part of the Scottish &lt;B&gt;fight for freedom&lt;/B&gt; which &lt;B&gt;had&lt;/B&gt; started &lt;B&gt;under&lt;/B&gt; Sir William Wallace.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wallace beat the well trained English forces at Stirling Bridge, &lt;B&gt;though&lt;/B&gt; the same &lt;B&gt;English forces &lt;/B&gt;did &lt;B&gt;for&lt;/B&gt; Bruce 17 years later at Bannockburn. The English army was in both cases far bigger than the one the Scots could muster, but even the feared archers, who &lt;B&gt;had been&lt;/B&gt; Englandâs trump card in the 100 years war against France, had to &lt;B&gt;yield&lt;/B&gt; &lt;B&gt;before&lt;/B&gt; Bruceâs spearmen, who fought with desperate courage.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wallace was unfortunately betrayed by his own men and &lt;B&gt;he&lt;/B&gt; did not survive the fight &lt;B&gt;for freedom&lt;/B&gt;, but Bruce and James Douglas did. These 2 national heroes continued the resistance &lt;B&gt;stubbornly &lt;/B&gt;until only 14 years after Bannockburn, &lt;B&gt;Edward III &lt;/B&gt;gave up all claims to Scottish territory and Bruce &lt;B&gt;was&lt;/B&gt; recognised as the lawful &lt;B&gt;K&lt;/B&gt;ing of Scotland. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: About paragraph</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AboutParagraph/kmvb/post.htm#52667</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:45:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:52667</guid><dc:creator>nona the brit</dc:creator><description>Hello,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In recent ten years, &lt;EM&gt; Choose either In recent years, or  the last decade or the last ten years. &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;few people in taiwan &lt;EM&gt;Taiwan.  This is a proper noun and needs a capital letter. &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;overly have been felling trees, &lt;EM&gt;have been felling too many trees, or have been over-harvesting trees, or have been intensively/overly logging  trees. The problem is really the word order.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;such as padauk,mangrove  &lt;EM&gt;paduak and mangrove.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;for the sake of earning their private profits &lt;EM&gt;could be re-phrased a little but is ok.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; that have ruined the luxuriant forest once. &lt;EM&gt; 'That have' presumably applies to the profits.  If not, you will need to re-phrase.  I think you mean the 'once luxuriant forest' (the forest used to be luxuriant but is not now) rather than 'ruined the luxuriant forest once' (which means that they ruined the forest on one occasion only).&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>