By Word order, Regards

Hi Jackson, "He" is in some location, possibly unable to find transportation. Actually, "frequency" in this context is usually applied to busses. One usually calls by telephone for a taxi cab, unless one is in the city at a busy time, and can "hail" a passing cab...

I'll try to give some information on this as a non-professional.This is how it looks like in the serbian language,and I suppose,it is very similar in all other slavic languages and also the latin language.For indicating a location the locative case of a noun is used.If the english language...

Clive wrote:The bottom line, of course, is that any of these systems is OK as long as it provides a tool that someone finds useful in learning to speak good English. Would you call this a relative clause? I don't know where the pen is. What would you say it relates to? When I asked this, I...

Hi, I need to write a sentence in the following pattern, and I don't see how it's possible. The pattern is: adjective + direct object + helping verb + subject + verb No articles allowed? So, something like 'Great strength did he use'. This kind of odd word order seems very literary or...

I think you all are missing one thing; it's the very basic question. The definition of operator. Up till now no one has defined what operators actually are. Operators are verbs with special properties as explained in the article I cited for you above. Some authors just call them...

Believer wrote:In regard to No.2, I can almost swear that I have heard some English professionals saying that there is an implicit word "to" there and whenever you hear the sentences without it, just remember it is to be included for a sentence to be a correct sentence. While I recognize...

Exciter wrote:Hi people. Please consider the following sentence: I bought a car, colored green, which is nice. As far as I know, "which" refers to the term just preceding. In the example it is the green color. However, if I would like "which" refer to the car, how can I do that without changing...

Hi, I'm really confused about the correct word order in sentences with 'have to': Which one is correct? She ALWAYS has to hurry in the morning. She has ALWAYS to hurry in the morning. And, by the way, 'She must always hurry in the morning' would also be correct,...

I don't feel there is any difference in meaning between the two versions, no particular emphasis on one thing or another. It's just that your version seems to illustrate the more standard word order - at least to my ear. The difference is similar to the difference between these: Give...

The sentence "We saw the man on the hill with a telescope" can be analyzed in the following way. The standard simple sentce structure -> Subject + verb + object + complement + Adverbial Qualification ( reference wren & martiin ) Here, the man becomes Object. The advective phrase is always...