<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Writing styles tag:Past tenses' matching tags 'Writing styles' and 'Past tenses'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aWriting+styles+tag%3aPast+tenses</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Writing styles tag:Past tenses' matching tags 'Writing styles' and 'Past tenses'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3256.36449)</generator><item><title>Re: Simultaneous or at the same time?? Or the absence of both</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SimultaneousSameAbsenceBoth/ddgwk/post.htm#267182</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 21:49:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:267182</guid><dc:creator>Goodman</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;As I had indicated, I opted to use past perfect for the explained reason. Of course, In many cases, simple past tense would just get the idea across fine. Itâs a matter of personal preference, or perhaps a writing style as long as itâs within the logical and grammatical confine of English.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thatâs just my own opinionâ¦&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>