<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Writing styles tag:Pronouns' matching tags 'Writing styles' and 'Pronouns'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aWriting+styles+tag%3aPronouns&amp;tag=Writing+styles,Pronouns&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Writing styles tag:Pronouns' matching tags 'Writing styles' and 'Pronouns'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3191.21962)</generator><item><title>Re: &amp;quot;Life that is&amp;quot;</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LifeThatIs/clkgk/post.htm#224087</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 00:26:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:224087</guid><dc:creator>paco2004</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;MrPedantic wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;I would read&amp;nbsp;"Life" as a restatement of the preceding "life", and "that" as a defining relative pronoun: 
&lt;P&gt;"...weeping inconsolably and trying to look at life ahead â life that is more engaging, more nuanced and ultimately more disturbing than art, in this case."&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;HelloãMrP&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thank you for the opinion. So I feel the writing style here is&amp;nbsp;of abnormally elaborate rhetoric. Am I right?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;paco&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Need your hands on this sentence completion question</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HandsSentenceCompletionQuestion/bwmbg/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:55:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:126316</guid><dc:creator>jeff_999</dc:creator><description>&lt;p class="MsoNormal" align="left"&gt;&lt;span&gt;The author did not see
the _______ inherent in her scathing criticism of writing style so similar to
her own.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
A. disinterest&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
B.&amp;nbsp; incongruity&amp;nbsp;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
C. pessimism&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
D. compliment&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
E. symbolism&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p class="MsoNormal" align="left"&gt;&lt;span&gt;The answer is B. I can tell. But what on earth is the sentence trying to
imply?... It may probably be because I got confused with the objective personal
pronoun "her" here. Maybe the second "her" refers to the
author of a certain book/article, and the first "her" refers to a
critic of this book/article's criticism/review. Tell me I got it fully right.
If I didn't, what exactly is that? &lt;br&gt;
Thank you so much for
your time. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>