<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:cover letter tag:Prepositions' matching tags 'cover letter' and 'Prepositions'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3acover+letter+tag%3aPrepositions&amp;tag=cover+letter,Prepositions&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:cover letter tag:Prepositions' matching tags 'cover letter' and 'Prepositions'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3161.22795)</generator><item><title>Re: My cover letter!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/MyCoverLetter/gjvch/post.htm#546540</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:50:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:546540</guid><dc:creator>26TMNTJG2PG</dc:creator><description>&lt;p style="TEXT-ALIGN:left;" align="left"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font&gt;&amp;quot;I am to writing you&amp;quot; is definitely wrong. It should be &amp;quot;I am writing to you&amp;quot;. The original poster noticed it as shown in the re-draft. As such, I did not bother to make a correction. Thank you, Enrico, for pointing out. If possible, please let me know all other such &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#333333;"&gt;incidents &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font&gt;which are purely &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:black;"&gt;fat-fingering mistakes.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="TEXT-ALIGN:left;" align="left"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="TEXT-ALIGN:left;" align="left"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#ff0000;"&gt;â&lt;/span&gt;I don&amp;#39;t think you can ever have I am to + -ing form, but sometimes to works as a preposition, and must be followed by a gerund. Some examples: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="TEXT-ALIGN:left;" align="left"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="TEXT-ALIGN:left;" align="left"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;I am looking forward to seeing you.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="TEXT-ALIGN:left;" align="left"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;I am used to working hard.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="TEXT-ALIGN:left;" align="left"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font&gt;&lt;span&gt;I object to working late in the night.&lt;span style="COLOR:#ff0000;"&gt;â&lt;/span&gt; â Agreed in toto.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="TEXT-ALIGN:left;" align="left"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="TEXT-ALIGN:left;" align="left"&gt;&lt;font&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#ff0000;"&gt;â&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;You need to say, &amp;quot;I would appreciate&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;it&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;..&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;span style="COLOR:#ff0000;"&gt;&amp;quot; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;- Agreed but âitâ is very commonly left out as understood.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: English - The reason why it is so hard to learn</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EnglishReasonHardLearn/vgbgr/post.htm#363953</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 16:13:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:363953</guid><dc:creator>Kathrin</dc:creator><description>&lt;div align="justify"&gt;Yes, it is true: about 500,000 and it develops really fast, faster than the others. But this takes into account only the words in the dictionary, so it could be questionable. German is for example one of the languages, in where one word could be created by every individuals complettly new and the dictonary contains only 300,000, otherwise it is imposible to print every combination, they are too much. Practically German has much more than 300,000.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the high number of words is not the reason for English to be so hard to learn, it is the variety of the language, not only the number of words. And the variaty is breathtaking: many words for the same phenomenom like (pullover, jumper, sweater) or (cover letter, covering letter, motivation letter) and much worst, idioms, high number of preposition in opposite to French, phrasal verbs etc. With other words: it is a bit of a challange. But the truth is: German is even worst and Japanese even a bigger challange, so enjoy it:-) At the moment I am learning French and I am happy: so easy:-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>