Yes,it's clear So it means that when the sentence is formed like this: Sbj+verb(present,past,or participle)+obj+verb(original form). So here when there's a verb for the obj it must stay in its original form. Thanks

Yes i misread it but is it true that "i saw a man run along the bank" is good english in Post :469303 ?

Hi Mr Micawber In Post :469280 u said that "I saw a man who ran along the bank" is the correct one that i must use. However in Post :469303 you said that "(X) "I saw a man who run along the bank"-- BAD ENGLISH" I thought it's the complete

So I'd say that was a posting error anyway it's much clearer now thank you Mr Liat

No,I'm not confused with "I was seeing a man who was running along the bank" i'm confused with whether i can say " i saw a man ran along the bank" or "i saw a man who ran along the bank" which is said to be a must use in 4th post but bad

user="Mister Micawber" No, you cannot use that; you must use: I saw a man who ran along the bank. Here the running and the seeing are not necessarily at the same time. 4th post what does the above mean? maybe i don't get it or... Thanks

Are you sure about your post? It's because at the last post u said i must use "I saw a man who run along the bank" but now u say "I saw a man who run along the bank" is bad english ?

so you mean that i can use either "I saw a man run along the bank" or "I saw a man who run along the bank" the same way as "I saw a man walked in to the bar" or "I saw a man who walked in to the bar", is that what you mean? and which is the

hi teacher, i thought it sounds quite weird with the sentence: "I saw a man who ran along the bank" can it be used when you want to tell someone that you saw a man who was running along the bank? or is it supposed to be i saw a man run along the

Hello Is it ok if i say it like this: "I saw a man ran along the bank" and is there any difference in the meaning to "I saw a man running along the bank" Thanks