There is no difference, though it may be better to use anyone, no one, everyone in writing because those are considered more formal.

For me it would be leigubílstjóri -- taxi driver in Icelandic, fasteignasala -- real estate agent in Icelandic, and hjúkrunarfæðingur -- nurse in Icleandic.

I find myself doing this sometimes, especially after I have watch British shows. I have been told by my Dad and brother that I was talking like a British person and to talk normal! I am from the U.S.

I do not watch Dr. Phil ,so I did not know his accent was sort of Southern. And I guessed at Nebraska for General American because I do not usually hear it. I mostly watch British shows. :)

I haven't heard him talk much, but I guess it is a version of General American like most news and talk show hosts use.

Sure, what exactly do you need help with? An accent that is easily understood no matter where people are from is probably a Western accent, like ones from Nebraska or Oklahoma. They are generally considered nuetral and from "no where".

No, mine. :) Just kidding.That is like saying what is the easiest language to learn. All languages are different. Different sounds, grammar, etc. All accents and dialects are different too. It depends on where or if you even want to go to the

Here are my comments. The parentheses indicate that something is not part of General American-like dialects or RP, but is found in certain regional dialects.. CA R -- American R's are always pronounced, British R's are not. In General

I never heard of zebra as the plural of zebra. I always heard zebras. And I was told fish is plural when talking about one species of fish and fishes is used when talking about more than one species of fish.

They are the same, except I was always told someone is more formal than somebody.