We took a visa exam at university today. The lecturer wanted us to find out the mistakes in some sentences. I was unable to be sure in some of the sentences; for instance, below are two of them: 1- That course book is lack of variety. In the

Good subeject. I really want to learn if there is any other than "let". The imperative mood can be used for all the persons except for the first singular and first plural in Turkish as well. Actually there is a linguistical explanation

Oh that's a good point. Let me provide reasoning for it. Drug wars are very expensive especially when a country has huge borders to look after. Rather than fighting drug smuggling at the borders, it might as well wipe off the sources of drugs.

I wonder why the US spend so much energy, time and money in countries like Israel, Afghanistan, Korea, Japan and Iraq. What does it gain from intervening in those countries' politics? Please, no hateful messages. I'm curious about it. I

As far as I know, There is not so big a difference, but: #1 emphasizes the completion of the action because of the past perfect there. I mean the writer imples that" only after it had stopped bitng did s/he get out of it"

-- what makes Hong Kong so exhilarating. A) It’s hard to explain B) Many travellers are curious C) One soon becomes aware D) It has been debated E) We have been much impressed The official right answer is A, and I have no objection

I'm tired. - Me too / Same here I'm not tired. - Me neither / Same here I've heard "sama here" for the first time :), and it seems correct to me for both negative and positive :)

I disagree with the answer key. In order for the right choice to be A a subject is needed: "S/he lost the necklace" For the second blank, the right structure must be the "bought". Here a reduction of relative clause is used.