I am using Mozilla under Linux. Until recently, I was able to use this special "Simple" "Content Editor" which you prepared for me and other users in both logged-in and anonymous mode. Lately, I can't

Yes, you're right about Google, it has its problems. But we don't have a better search machine. So, at the BBC site: 2 from bbc.co.uk for "years since I've had a"

Those 4 are examples of inconsistency in thinking: condition: real conclusion: unreal/hypothetical Don't use them, if you want to speak good English.

He will tell you the aspects of love that you haven't thought about. This sounds like: He will list to you you the aspects of love that you haven't thought about. I'd say: He will comment/expatiate to you on/about aspects of love that

At Google books, re > You can leave your umbrella in the entr y 4 on "be left at the entry" 205 on "be left at the entrance" [to be preferred

Sorry, I can't tell you more than in the other thread. Only an expert in both writings of that period and in Emerson could tell you that in definite terms, IMO. Try to find an expert in Emerson.

a) where were you? [something more distant in the past, say yesterday b) where have you been? [something recent , say until now

>Is 3 year long film understood as a film that takes 3 years to make? Nope. It was produced 3 years ago.

Are you looking for anything in particular? [Are you looking for something specific/well-defined? Are you looking for anything particular? [Are you looking for something strange/special?

Probably: You would give me the conventional, strict answer/moral which is offered in religious-based school (Sunday school)