Normal 0 21 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 The main issues that the work is dealing with are countability and uncountable nouns in the English and Slovak languages. The work is a comparative analysis of these two morphological

Hi quys, I'm finishing my bachelor paper these days , it contains about 30 pages and the topic is English Noncount Nouns and Their Slovak Equivalents. Is there any native speaker who would like to read through it and help me to correct

The first sentence is correct. There is an subject (song) and verb (is) so it is OK. In the second sentence...subject + verb + another subject (pronoun IT)??? it is nonsense

the process of purification sounds more natural, I have never heard about the second usage, I think it is rubbish :-)

Hi, I'm 21. I want to improve my English and making English speaking friends seems the best way to me :)

Hi, really good work. I can see mistakes only in Wednesday, 4th June - Jerry has just fallen asleep, and finally I HAVE (why past?). And in the last sentence...you are plannig what you are going to do, so again why WENT?

Hi! Transitive verbs must have an object, they express an action that passes over from the subject (doer of the action) to the object (the receiver of the action).They can be monotransitive (require 1 object), ditransitive (can have 2 objects BUT

I do not think there is any comma required. "that we can..." is a noun clause which functions as direct object so it is ok without comma in front of THAT. The comma is required especially in appositives.

Hi, it would be better to use present perfect tense. It is frequently used with JUST - when something has just happened and there are some consequences up to the present. So I would check the first two sentences :). And the third and fourth...the