Are these sentences below correct, and if so, do they have the same meaning? 1.The program has one shortcoming: flexibility. 2.The program has one shortcoming; that is flexibility. 3.The program has one shortcoming, and that is flexibility.

Hi Marius, Thank you for explaining it to me. Although I know what it means contempt of court proceedings , I still don't understand the meaning of contempt proceedings as well as: contempt hearing, contempt appeals, contempt orders. Let's say

Can anyone help me with the sentence below. I don't understand the meaning of contempt . Also, is it more appropriate to say die from starvation instead of die of starvation? and I am not sure I understand the phrase disposing of her; is

Thank you Mister Micawber.

I'd like you to tell me if my understanding of the following sentences, below, is correct. 1. If I knew she is coming, I would go to welcome her at the airport. 2. If I knew she was coming, I would go to welcome her at the airport. 3. If I

Now, it is clear to me. Thank you.

Please explain to me, why do we need 'of' in the sentence below. What would happen if we omitted the 'of'; would it change the meaning of the sentence? This conclusion is of more than academic interest to me since my wife asked me to suggest how

Now I understand it. Thank you very much. This forum is great!

Please, explain to me why there is no article before 'garret' in the sentence below; and if it was, what would it be: 'the' or 'a'. The landlady who provided him with garret , dinners, and attendance, lived on the floor below, and every time he

Thanks Clive