According to a journalism professor, "that" should be used in attribution where the subject changes. He says he supports electoral reform vs. He says (that) his opponent supports electoral reform.

Would you say "the party would " or "the law would incriminate people who blah blah blah" instead of "the party will" or "the law will"? You can use either one. If it is enacted, the law will ... vs. If it

No, Doll. I couldn't find an adequate answer to my question about beginning sentences with attribution. On the 'will' vs' would.' It sounds like we're both unsure. After all, merely because something is repeated in print

Hello, Welcome to EF! Thanks My two cents: -- would vs will Let's say you're discussing a plans for a party or a law that may or may not actualize but you're describing what they will entail. Would you say "the party would

I can't find simple answers to these questions in the CMS or via web pages. Here they are: -- would vs will Let's say you're discussing a plans for a party or a law that may or may not actualize but you're describing what they